Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Advanced Quantum Mechanics, FUF070

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-10-27 - 2011-01-18
Antal svar: 14
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Gabriele Ferretti»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

14 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»5 35%
Around 20 hours/week»2 14%
Around 25 hours/week»6 42%
Around 30 hours/week»1 7%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.21

- the working time was even less - about 8 hours» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

14 svarande

0%»1 7%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»5 35%
100%»8 57%

Genomsnitt: 4.35

- The missed classes are due to colliding lectures» (75%)
- I think I missed one practice session due to bad alarm clock.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

3. How understandable are the course goals?

14 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 21%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 21%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»8 57%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

- However the course goals don"t seem to coincide with what the course actually covers. From the course homepage: "The aim of the course is to further the students knowledge of non-relativistic and relativistic quantum mechanics." We didn"t really cover relativistic QM.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
- I think it has been divided into clear parts of what your are to learn.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

12 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»12 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

12 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»6 50%
Yes, definitely»6 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- The examination was too time consuming and to hard compared to the home assignments» (To some extent)
- It is a bit strange though that the home exam was so much harder than the homeworks, given that the time was much more limited. Especially as the homeworks counts for higher grades.» (Yes, definitely)
- The problems was definetly relevant, however there could have been maybee one problem less. It was a tough all nighter.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 15%
Large extent»6 46%
Great extent»5 38%

Genomsnitt: 3.23

- The teacher was greatly qualified.» (Great extent)
- Gabrielle Ferreti has been an excellent lecturer. Very enthusiastic and well read in his subject. » (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»2 14%
Some extent»3 21%
Large extent»8 57%
Great extent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

- Well sakurai is as always top notch. The hand outs on BCS and NT was also very good!» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

14 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 7%
Rather well»6 42%
Very well»7 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

- handouts sometimes hard to read. Feedback concerning the exercises barely existent.» (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

14 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 7%
Very good»11 78%
I did not seek help»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 4.07

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

14 svarande

Very poorly»1 7%
Rather poorly»2 14%
Rather well»3 21%
Very well»7 50%
I did not seek cooperation»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

- That"s my own fault.» (Rather poorly)

11. How was the course workload?

14 svarande

Too low»1 7%
Low»2 14%
Adequate»10 71%
High»1 7%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.78

- Low before the home exam and denfinitely too high during the eam» (Low)
- I didn"t spend too much time on the course since I had two other, very time consuming, courses. Otherwise I probably would have spent more time on the course. Likewise if there would have been more material.» (Low)
- More exercises might have helped to prepare the exam and improve the understanding (but there are exercises in the book).» (Adequate)
- It was rather ok. The exam was a bit tough.» (Adequate)
- Relativel easy hand in problems with enough time. The home exam was difficult, and the time for it to short.» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

14 svarande

Too low»1 7%
Low»1 7%
Adequate»4 28%
High»5 35%
Too high»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

- I only studied halftime.» (Adequate)
- due to one extra course.» (High)
- GravCos and Advanced QM did put some pressure, tough not unexpected. It was self chosen most of it.» (High)
- Again, three courses.» (Too high)
- My own fault by taking 3 courses.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

14 svarande

Poor»1 7%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 14%
Good»8 57%
Excellent»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

- The exam was not at all, what I expected.» (Adequate)

14. What should be preserved to next year?

- Gabriele! One of the best lecturers I have ever had.»
- Gabriele»
- teacher, litterature»
- That one gets an impression of different applications of the multi-body theory.»
- Gabrielle Ferreti and sakurai.»
- Gabrielle Feretti»
- The handins wew really good. Could have been harder considering the level of the exam questions.»

15. What should be changed to next year?

- A bit harder Hand-ins and a bit easier exam. The Hand-ins were very easy compared to the final exam.»
- Harder home assignments and a bit easier home exam!»
- The time for the homeexam should be extended.»
- Maybe a little bit less scattering theory?»
- I think the homeworks should be harder, especially if they are intended as requirements for higher grades. Personally I find an expressed bonus point system better than the current examination system, which isn"t very transparent to the students. You sort of make your best and then there"s only hope...»
- The exam should be weighed a bit more if a 24 h exam should really demand the student to use 24 h awake. Maybee could be two days next time som you use 12 h each day and then can go to sleep. The rest of the study week get sort of suffering due to shifting the hours so.»
- Make the 24 hrs exam a 36 hrs or longer exam. »
- A 24 hour exam wasnt optimal. If it is important to keep the format of the exam, please divide it into 2 parts with 12 hours for each part and 12 hours of break in between. Studying for almost 22 hours straight isnt very fun at all.»

16. Additional comments

- I hope you don"t break your arm next year!»
- The examination. A 24 hours exam is tuff while you can"t sleep and other exams can be suffering.»
- Im glad I took the course. It feels very relevant for continued studies on the topic.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från