Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Product Life Cycle Management PPU110, PPU110

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-10-27 - 2010-11-15
Antal svar: 19
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 31%
Kontaktperson: Lars Almefelt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Maskinteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

19 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»3 15%
Around 25 hours/week»11 57%
Around 30 hours/week»4 21%
At least 35 hours/week»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.15

- But absolutely more hours spent at the end. In the beginning difficult to make progress in project without supervision.» (Around 25 hours/week)
- Most of the time for the project» (Around 30 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

19 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 5%
50%»4 21%
75%»4 21%
100%»10 52%

Genomsnitt: 4.21

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

18 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 16%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 5%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 22%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»10 55%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

16 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»12 75%
No, the goals are set too high»4 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

17 svarande

No, not at all»1 5%
To some extent»11 64%
Yes, definitely»4 23%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.29

- It is like two different courses, the project and the duggas.» (To some extent)
- There are a lot of information in the lecture handouts, but the dugga just examine a little pice of that. » (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

19 svarande

Small extent»2 10%
Some extent»8 42%
Large extent»6 31%
Great extent»3 15%

Genomsnitt: 2.52

- excellent class, things i never saw before, totally multidisciplinary.» (Great extent)
- The supervisors for the PLM-project were really helpful. When asking the teacher though it wasn"t that helpful, regardless of what you asked.» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

19 svarande

Small extent»4 21%
Some extent»9 47%
Large extent»3 15%
Great extent»3 15%

Genomsnitt: 2.26

- Did not read the articles and it was not necessary to pass the course» (Small extent)
- out of the compendium, half great articles, half useless. » (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

19 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 5%
Rather well»13 68%
Very well»5 26%

Genomsnitt: 3.21

- The project description is quite confused since I don"t know where to start.» (Rather well)


9. What is your opinion about the project work?

19 svarande

Poor»2 10%
Fair»2 10%
Adequate»8 42%
Good»4 21%
Excellent»3 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.21

- I dont see the point of this project, why is this a mandatory course?!» (Poor)
- A lot of time was spent making everything work. The step from grade 3 to grade 4 is also too big.» (Fair)
- Spent too much trying to fix the CATIA models, they were very badly made.» (Adequate)
- A majority of the time is spent on fixing bugs, errors and backups etc. and not on activities related to the course goals. One however understands a plm/pdmsystem rather well.» (Adequate)
- The software requires alot of patience. Perhaps it would be preferable to use one that is further developed and more stabile.» (Adequate)
- Too few hours of supervising the project. Wanted the two hours on Wednesdays to also be supervised. At least for us limited to the prototype lab"s computers. Too much we had to look up on our own how to do things. Very time inefficient and do not always contribute the better learning!! The scripts and CAD we received was far from being usable. A lot of things had to be changed. The papers we bought did not give any help on how to run the processes. And why didn"t you say exactly how the bat-file and Catia macro files should look like to start them?? This only costs us all a lot of time.» (Adequate)
- There was a little too much programming involved at the end of the project in a language that has not been included in the education earlier. Also, it could have been good to try the user interface yourself prior to starting the project so that you know what to expect and how to use the system.» (Adequate)
- I like it includes knowledge from previous courses» (Excellent)
- I learnt a lot from that.» (Excellent)

10. Did you get adequate supervision?

19 svarande

No, not at all»1 5%
To some extent»6 31%
Yes, definitely»12 63%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

- Too few hours of supervising the project. Wanted the two hours on Wednesdays to also be supervised. At least for us limited to the prototype lab"s computers. » (To some extent)
- Very good and helpful supervisors, at least Mattias and Anna who were the one I went to. » (Yes, definitely)

11. Were the tutorial materials helpful?

19 svarande

No, not at all»2 10%
To some extent»8 42%
Yes, definitely»9 47%

Genomsnitt: 2.36

- Difficult to read, information was missing in some places.» (No, not at all)
- to late in the course and only coverd basic functionality» (No, not at all)
- The course could have comprised more on scripting since it"s such an important part of configuring a system.» (To some extent)
- smarteam is not well used by anyone, not the students, not the teacher, not the ta» (To some extent)
- wanted more on running the processes» (To some extent)

Study climate

12. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

19 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 5%
Rather good»6 31%
Very good»12 63%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

- Not so helpful and available.» (Rather good)

13. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

19 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»6 31%
Very well»13 68%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.68

14. How was the course workload?

19 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»7 36%
High»10 52%
Too high»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.73

- If you don"t try for a higher grade than 3.» (Adequate)
- Only because the programming part took very much of the projects time even for simple code since we are used to matlab or java and that the system can"t cope with all Visual basic commands. You even have to change the info you find on the web.» (High)
- The lecture and duggas was not so demanded, but the project took some time. » (High)
- Because of the high uncertainty of how to do things.» (Too high)

15. How was the total workload this study period?

19 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 5%
Adequate»8 42%
High»8 42%
Too high»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

- Schedule collided with all lectures etc in my other course, Sustainable development, which made the workload high.» (High)

Summarizing questions

16. What is your general impression of the course?

19 svarande

Poor»3 15%
Fair»1 5%
Adequate»7 36%
Good»6 31%
Excellent»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.15

17. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The Tutorials»
- The guest lectures at the end. I found them very rewarding.»
- The project should be preserved but could be improved according to next question.»
- the project»
- The course. Good know about these things, how you should/could work with files in a good way in a company.»
- The tutorial»

18. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Fix the CATIA-models and the tutorial.»
- Remove the course as mandatory.»
- The whole course, and explain exactly what PLM is about and not PDM. Or change the name of the course to PDM.»
- The software, Smarteam.»
- some of the articles to read and get a better expertise for the smarteam.»
- Do not have the 2nd dugga last week on Friday. I had a difficult exam on the following Monday and therefore didn"t take dugga 2. Week 6 would be better. The hand-outs were not worth to read. The lecturer said they were for reference so that"s why almost nothing showed up in duggas. »
- The explanation of the program. You just had to find out for yourself and then ask. That is not a good way. And why a lot of scripts without be able to learn the language?»

19. Additional comments

- Rather poor course, very poor programme with problems. Not enough supervision or help, i.e. I understand that there are a lot of people wanting help, but for one group it takes ca 30 minutes to help. So something has to be done. Maybe a better liable program, PDM Link instead for Pro/E??»

Kursutvärderingssystem från