ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Road Vehicle Aerodynamics Advanced, TME175

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-10-27 - 2010-11-27
Antal svar: 10
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 100%
Kontaktperson: Helena Martini»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

10 svarande

At most 10 hours/week»0 0%
Around 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»3 30%
Around 25 hours/week»5 50%
At least 30 hours/week»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- A lot of time was spent on the course when we finally got comfortable with the software. An since errors occured frequently, a lot of extra time had to be spent to solve the problems.» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

10 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»2 20%
50%»0 0%
75%»0 0%
100%»8 80%

Genomsnitt: 4.4

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

10 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 10%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»9 90%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- The goeals are clear but gives a little missleading clue to how much time each step requires.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

10 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»10 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

Teaching and course administration

5. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»1 10%
Some extent»6 60%
Large extent»1 10%
Great extent»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- During the first few weeks, the students where higly dependent on the tutorials. Later in the course, we still hade to look inte the tutorials often.» (Great extent)

6. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts, contact with supervisors etc work?

9 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»2 22%
Very well»7 77%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

Study climate

7. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»10 100%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Overall very good, but at the end ot the course where the need for help was greatest, the access for help was worst.» (Very good)

8. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

10 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 10%
Very well»9 90%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- Some groups where moore keen than others to share their progress in work. For example, tips and trixs recieved from the phd students where not passed on through other groups in many cases. » (Rather well)

9. How was the course workload?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 60%
High»4 40%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- The workload can be set anywhere between high and infinity, depending on how much work is put into the project, report and presentation.» (High)

Summarizing questions

10. What is your general impression of the course?

10 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 10%
Good»2 20%
Excellent»7 70%

Genomsnitt: 4.6

- At the end of the course, we have recieved almoast exactly the knowledge that people from the industry is looking for.» (Excellent)
- The course was great! It really gives you a deeper understanding of how to connect the theory to modelling and be able to get an actual result that is comparable to the real thing!» (Excellent)

11. What is your impression of the Assignment - Discretization and Iteration?

10 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 20%
Good»7 70%
Excellent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- It took time before we understood what had to be done, so perhaps it could have been explained a little better.» (Good)
- Even though the theory in the assignment is very very basic and simplified it gives you an fingerpoint of how grids are created.» (Excellent)

12. What is your impression of the introductory sessions for the softwares ANSA and Fluent?

10 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 20%
Good»4 40%
Excellent»2 20%
Did not attend the sessions»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 4.4

- The introduction to ANSA was better than for fluent. We ould have liked another introduction to ansa a few days later (so we had time so try thins ourself) and the again a demo in fluent when we had tried it for our self for a few days.» (Adequate)
- Maybee a couple of hours with a tutor present in the beginning of the ANSA-work,would have been good. Insterad of having to run and ask.» (Adequate)
- It was good ! But sometimes the tutorials just say "choose this and that instead of this and that" and doesnt mention why and you just have to accept it without knowing why, so maybe a lecture to explain the difference between important choices on the way. (schemes, upwind, first order second order, coupling etc mostly fluent since the tutorial was made for an older version) » (Good)

13. How would you rate the project work?

10 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»3 30%
Excellent»7 70%

Genomsnitt: 4.7

- Very good but the goals and timeline should be highlighted better.» (Excellent)

14. What did you think about the project layout?

10 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»5 50%
Excellent»5 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The huge freedom»
- The project work, Guest lecturers, Work in fluent AND ansa. »
- Everything!»

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The computers, one more and better ones.»
- -The tutorials needs to be changed to something better, or complemented by a few pages that explains thing better. You cannot just klick through a tutorial because no knowledge will be absorbed. -Most groups experienced a lot of problems with the software, should be solved by better computers or more help. -The soundlevel at the computers where (quite often) enough to shake your bones apart! -More lectures, we hade to use our knowledge from the rvad course and apply it to complicated problems, thus having less knowledge than what was required to solve the problem. -Five groups and four computers, everybody understands that one goup is gonna be left behind in some aspects. -To increase the size of the class to more than 10 people has their pros and cons, but should be tried if possible.»
- Earplugs are recommended for this course ! :) Maybe faster computers...»

17. Additional comments

- Very good course, and it was nice with people from SAAB during presentations.»
- Maybe a meeting with the students discussing the results of the simulation can be of value.»
- Noise from the windtunnel, try having this evaluation by our computers! Overall, I´,m very pleased with this course and with minor adjustments it could be extremly good.»
- Is it possible to put the computors somewhere else? When the wind-tunnel was running it was like working on a factory-floor. Loud grinding noises.»
- Overall a well planned course and we had a lot of fun! »

Kursutvärderingssystem från