Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Technical Acoustics I, 2007, VTA 081
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2007-12-19 - 2008-01-31 Antal svar: 14 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 66% Kontaktperson: Astrid Pieringer» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.14 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 3 | | 21% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 7 | | 50% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 1 | | 7% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 3 | | 21% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.28 - - Hard to estimate» (Around 20 hours/week)
2. How large part of the lectures offered did you attend? 14 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
75%» | | 7 | | 50% |
100%» | | 7 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 4.5 3. How large part of the exercise classes offered did you attend?14 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
33%» | | 1 | | 7% |
66%» | | 3 | | 21% |
100%» | | 10 | | 71% |
Genomsnitt: 3.64 - if exercise classes = assignment desc/hand-out.» (100%)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.4. How understandable are the course goals?14 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 3 | | 21% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 1 | | 7% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 5 | | 35% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 5 | | 35% |
Genomsnitt: 2.85 - maybe i saw them but i don"t remember» (I have not seen/read the goals)
5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.12 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 11 | | 91% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 1 | | 8% |
Genomsnitt: 2.08 - Havn"t seen any clear goals of what is expected of us» (No, the goals are set too high)
6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?12 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 4 | | 33% |
Yes, definitely» | | 6 | | 50% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 2 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 2.83
Teaching and course administration7. To what extent have the lectures been of help for your learning?14 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 4 | | 28% |
Large extent» | | 9 | | 64% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 2.78 - Easy to get passive during lectures.» (Some extent)
8. How was the presentation speed in the lectures?14 svarande
much too slow» | | 0 | | 0% |
a bit too slow» | | 2 | | 14% |
adequate» | | 11 | | 78% |
a bit too fast» | | 1 | | 7% |
too fast» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.92 9. To what extent have the exercise classes been of help for your learning?13 svarande
Small extent» | | 1 | | 7% |
Some extent» | | 8 | | 61% |
Large extent» | | 1 | | 7% |
Great extent» | | 3 | | 23% |
Genomsnitt: 2.46 - Small extent since they didn"t really excist.» (Small extent)
- some parts of the exercises are just tweaking Matlab (e.g. the Rayleigh integral, the elastic interlayer) and not a reflexion process» (Some extent)
10. How was the presentation speed in the exercise classes?12 svarande
much too slow» | | 0 | | 0% |
a bit too slow» | | 3 | | 25% |
adequate» | | 9 | | 75% |
a bit too fast» | | 0 | | 0% |
much too fast» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.75 - - Too slow on the first assignment, but it could depend on that I knew the topic quite well.» (a bit too slow)
11. To what extent have the lecture notes been of help for your learning?14 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 4 | | 28% |
Large extent» | | 3 | | 21% |
Great extent» | | 7 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 3.21 - It still some errors in them, figure numbers and captions are missing and "Comic Sans" typeface slows down my reading speed. Also, some internal references ("last lecture ...") could have been more precise, numbered sections would be nice.» (Large extent)
- There isn"t much else to work with than lecture notes.» (Large extent)
12. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?14 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 8 | | 57% |
Very well» | | 6 | | 42% |
Genomsnitt: 3.42 - - Some delay before the hand outs was put to the page.» (Rather well)
Assignments13. How do you judge the level of difficulty of the assignments?14 svarande
much too difficult» | | 1 | | 7% |
a bit too difficult» | | 6 | | 42% |
adequate» | | 7 | | 50% |
a bit too easy» | | 0 | | 0% |
much too easy» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.42 - we may have some more sources besides lecture notes. » (a bit too difficult)
- - Some parts a bit too easy, others a bit too difficult.» (adequate)
14. Was the time period assigned for the assignments sufficient?The time period was...14 svarande
much too short.» | | 0 | | 0% |
a bit too short.» | | 4 | | 28% |
adequate.» | | 10 | | 71% |
a bit too long.» | | 0 | | 0% |
much too long.» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.71 - Time period OK. BUT, I would prefer if Assign A was handed out earlier during the course. I feel that I didn"t learn much during the first weeks, because I really need exercise to understand.» (adequate.)
15. Where the assignments corrected like announced in the hand-out "Comments on assignments"?14 svarande
not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
more or less» | | 1 | | 7% |
fairly well» | | 9 | | 64% |
completely» | | 4 | | 28% |
Genomsnitt: 3.21
Study climate16. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help of the professor?14 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 3 | | 21% |
Very good» | | 8 | | 57% |
I did not seek help» | | 3 | | 21% |
Genomsnitt: 4 17. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help of the course assistent?14 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 4 | | 28% |
Very good» | | 10 | | 71% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.71 18. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?14 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 1 | | 7% |
Rather well» | | 4 | | 28% |
Very well» | | 9 | | 64% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.57 19. How was the course workload?14 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 9 | | 64% |
High» | | 5 | | 35% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.35 20. How was the total workload this study period?14 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 2 | | 14% |
Adequate» | | 5 | | 35% |
High» | | 7 | | 50% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.35 - - Depending on the IPC» (Low)
Summarizing questions21. What is your general impression of the course?14 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 7 | | 50% |
Good» | | 5 | | 35% |
Excellent» | | 2 | | 14% |
Genomsnitt: 3.64 - Sometimes, I would prefer a more mathematical/theoretical approach to fully understand the background to some of the formulas used.
I would also prefer some exercises/problems without grading, in addition to the assignments. Now, I learnt 90% of the course material while doing "the exam" = assignments. I don"t think that is a very good thing.» (Adequate)
22. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- - The assignments. You could learn quite a lot from them... The oral exam, nice opportunity to directly get feedback and response!»
- Hand-in assignments.»
- most of the things»
- Oral exam, hand-ins.»
- Good to have the SVM labs that is similar to what we are doing in TA. »
- The assignments»
- The well-explained lectures»
- oral examination, good test in order to see whether we understood the topic»
23. What should definitely be changed to next year?- - Make all lecture notes availabe in the beginning of the course»
- The typeface used in the notes...»
- some more problems might be solved in the lectures or exercise times, beside assignments. »
- A better overview of the material and more explanations on applications»
- More clear goals, so we know what is expected of us. So much theory on short period of time can be hard to process.»
- - More time to do the assignments
- More concrete examples in lectures
- Less maths and equations (less abstract)»
- nothing should definitely changed, maybe more practical exemples»
- some help in matlab about table»
- The way of explaining the concepts, in some cases it was better to read the lecture notes than going to the lectures.
During the exercise lectures the womework can be explained in a better way, more deeply»
24. Additional comments
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|