Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Intercultural communication, SJO231

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-10-25 - 2010-12-25
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 37%
Kontaktperson: Anneli Rask»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 18%
Around 20 hours/week»5 45%
Around 25 hours/week»2 18%
Around 30 hours/week»2 18%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.36

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»2 18%
75%»3 27%
100%»6 54%

Genomsnitt: 4.36

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

11 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 54%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 45%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

- The subject of the course can in itself be a bit unclear.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

11 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»11 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

11 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 36%
Yes, definitely»6 54%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»1 9%
Some extent»2 18%
Large extent»6 54%
Great extent»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.81

- The classes made good ground for interesting discussions.» (Large extent)
- We had an excellent teacher.» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»2 18%
Some extent»2 18%
Large extent»3 27%
Great extent»4 36%

Genomsnitt: 2.81

- We had a lot of carefully selected course material. » (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly»2 18%
Rather badly»3 27%
Rather well»4 36%
Very well»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.54

- The deadlines were a bit unclear. Confusing with information in both drop boxes and other places that did not match.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»5 45%
Very good»6 54%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

10 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 10%
Rather well»5 50%
Very well»4 40%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

11. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»10 90%
High»1 9%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

12. How was the total workload this study period?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 54%
High»4 36%
Too high»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 9%
Adequate»1 9%
Good»8 72%
Excellent»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- essays»
- course materials, they really good and helpful»
- Information about essay writing should definitely be preserved.»
- Telling own experiences.»
- The course contents»
- Lecturer, study material»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- course literature (more original books, less subjective documents/powerpoints), remove the powerpoints with sounds), better course information (deadlines...)»
- the ping pong system need to improve. the cousre mainly basis on the internet system, it is hard for students if they were separated from the "classroom"»
- Course literature should be reviewed again. There maybe some additions which show researches or studies for onboard use. Existing literature has also a wide content but should be limited with some other, clear new adding.»
- The pace of the course»
- Organization, information, structure»

16. Additional comments

- in the begining of the program, it should take more lectures than just two. for international students, the education system and pattern are different from the Swedish one. it might take more time to adjust. and the second time to take lecture was in Aland. really hard for international students to get used to the program»
- Very interesting course, very knwledgable and helpful teacher. Caothic information on what was expected to be done and by when...»
- Many thanks for the excellent teacher.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från