|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
TKDAT ht10 Concurrent programming, TDA381Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2010-10-22 - 2010-11-03 Antal svar: 28 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 26% Kontaktperson: Lars Nordlund» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Datateknik 300 hp
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.28 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.14 - Took it as an extra course, on top of regular courses» (At most 15 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?28 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.78 - Took it as an extra course, on top of regular courses» (0%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?28 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.14 - I don"t remember the goals. » (I have not seen/read the goals) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.25 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.04 - Never saw the course goals as far as I can remember..» (?) 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?27 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.07 - Example exams look very hard to understand. It"s difficult to understand the questions and provided solutions are somtimes missing. The real exam wasn"t so good either. Questions were hard to understand and especially Q5 and 6 were very strange.» (To some extent) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?28 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.75 - Det var inga föreläsningar: utan högläsning av slides.» (Small extent) 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.19 - I didn"t buy the book» (?) 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?27 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.25 - To use a Swedish phrase: "en riktig kalkon-kurs administrativt". Very bad information on the website, slow updates, horribly bad assistants (a little better in the very end of the couse though) and the computer issue that made it impossible to work for a couple of days.» (Very badly) Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?28 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.67 - When you have 2 assistants, and one of them knows absolutely nothing about the subject what so ever, it can"t be described as anything but very poor!» (Very poor) 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?28 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.71 - Both of us postponed assignments somewhat, but co-operation went very well when we actually did something. » (Rather well) 11. How was the course workload?28 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.39 - The labs was quite hard, but the exam was easier» (Adequate) 12. How was the total workload this study period?26 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - Failed the other course totally, but the course isn"t the problem, I am. » (Adequate) Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?28 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.82 - En besvikelse. » (Poor) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Fillippo var riktigt bra handledare. »- The main concepts and the course itself. Everything else could be changed, especially the labs and the supervisors.» - jag gillade föreläsaren, han var bra.» - slides are good» - Everything!» - Can"t really think of anything at the moment. Josef did a okey job, just need to be more structured.» - 2nd lab» - Assignments. Lectures. » - Mosly quite good. Very interesting course.» - Everything :)» - Labs, lecturer.» 15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Faster response on the hannd-ins.»- Betters lab assistants. Faster responses to lab submissions.» - more attention to JAVA implementations of all problems, there were no any information about sockets in Java» - Handledarna kunde inte ibland språken labbarna var i. En grupp berättade att deras lab2 blivit godkända trots att dom inte fungerade. Det fanns på tok för lite material på hur JR fungerade. Det blev onödigt smärtsamt att försöka lista ut det samtidigt som man skulle klara av labben. JR var dessutom en plåga att installera hemma och setup_course fungerade lite då och då på Chalmers. Rättningen på labbarna var oacceptabelt långsam. Inte alla av årets handledare borde fortsätta nästa året. Vi frågade en om hjälp och han var typ "vi testar och ändra här och ser om något ändras". Hade ingen strategi för att hitta felet utan sa att vi skulle testa och ändra lite slumpmässiga saker och se om det blev bättre (Ja, han sa så!). » - Assignments should be changed as it has no role in practicing the concepts. most of time is wasted on other things which are not really important for the course. Assignments should be like small individual assignments (>=exercises) that focus more on the course contents.» - Lab 2. It seems very strange that a University like GU has assignments where the point is to simulate people drinking lots of beer and teach the workflow at a pub. The talk at the assignment sessions was in terms of how much people can drink and details in serving alcoholics. That could maybe take place in a student union"s group but not as a compulsory assignment in one of the university"s courses. This is nothing else than doing commercial for alcohol and totally unacceptable. Please think of everyone who have drinking problem or have a close relative or friend with such issues. It"s not very funny to be reminded from that at school. Question 2 on the exam was even worse. I personally was chocked and I couldn"t believe my eyes when I read the question. Using drugs which obviously kill people and the maintence of them on a University exam, that"s horrible and completely disgusting. I"m looking forward to hear the lecturer defend the choice of exam questions and labs!» - istället för övningar som ska ge ledtrådar till labbarna så mer handledning. hinner inte med labbarna och övningarna på normal planering» - literature» - Return the labs much faster.» - Proof-read slides, make sure the slides are in the correct order, prepare better and, most importantly, GET ASSISTANTS WHO KNOWS THE SUBJECT!» - The workload and the level of the exam!» - May be lecture about transactional memory, more examples» - Waiting time on Fire. Waiting time on Fire. PDFs. » - It was a rather steep step to get started with the labs. Some more "getting started" help/instructions would had been good.» - The cyclic barrier slides should be fixed to the simpler version ,) And the difference in difficulty between exams is significant so looking at the earlier exams scared the shit out of us. Maybe you should make sure that the difficulty level is more even.» 16. Additional comments- The course is great, but I think there is not enough time to remember and define all aspects of concurrent programming. (May be it is the problem of education system in Sweden/Europe...)»- Cremona hade inte beställt kurslitteraturen vid kursstart. » - The course book was not available at Cremona until week 3-4, putting up the course web page LV1 would help people try to get hold of the book in other ways. No questions about the labs (why not?), so some thoughts here then: It would be better if lab (2 and) 3 could be made available a little earlier at the course web page. Sure, it was a small lab, but not everyone can sit at a computer waiting for it to show up and then use the rest of the week to complete it. Some people might have children and a lot of lectures wednesday-friday, and they wouldn"t have a chance to plan their time accordingly. Lab 2 was very fun!» - Lab 2. It seems very strange that a University like GU has assignments where the point is to simulate people drinking lots of beer and teach the workflow at a pub. The talk at the assignment sessions was in terms of how much people can drink and details in serving alcoholics. That could maybe take place in a student union"s group but not as a compulsory assignment in one of the university"s courses. This is nothing else than doing commercial for alcohol and totally unacceptable. Please think of everyone who have drinking problem or have a close relative or friend with such issues. It"s not very funny to be reminded from that at school. Question 2 on the exam was even worse. I personally was chocked and I couldn"t believe my eyes when I read the question. Using drugs which obviously kill people and the maintence of them on a University exam, that"s horrible and completely disgusting. I"m looking forward to hear the lecturer defend the choice of exam questions and labs!» - no» - Cred to Filippo, he knew the subject and tried to help and was really helpfull.» - I am reading TM» - The exam was a bit difficult comparing to old exams of this course! 4 hours is not enough to deal with such problems! Make it a bit easier or put some more reasonable theoretical questions!»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21%