Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Quality assurance HT 10, SJO695

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-10-22 - 2010-11-22
Antal svar: 3
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 20%
Kontaktperson: Anneli Rask»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

3 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 66%
Around 20 hours/week»1 33%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.33

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

3 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 33%
75%»1 33%
100%»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 4

- I do not understand the kindergarten approach to manadtory attendance. This programmme is designed for active seafarers and people alrwady working ashore and its not possible always to attend. It should be possible to make good the absence and not as it is now when the teacher asks you to return next year!» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

3 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 66%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»0 0%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 2

- The goals of the course was not clear. Do you teach ism or quality assurance? I think there is no relation between ism and quality assurance since ism is a mandatory regulation like constitution or commercial law. You have to fulfill the requirement of ism otherwise you cannot make business. You said that focus of quality assurance is providing confidence that quality requirements will be fulfilled and made a connection between ism and quality assurance.However it is not possible to provide confidence by fulfilling mandatory requirements because they are mandatory. According to your logic we can say that constitutional law is also part of quality assurance because constitutional law is also requirements of authorities. So that next year you can teach constitutional law instead of ism.» (I have not seen/read the goals)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

2 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 50%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»1 50%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

3 svarande

No, not at all»3 100%
To some extent»0 0%
Yes, definitely»0 0%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

- There were some questions about limitation of liability and alter ego and oil pollution. what is the relation between quality assurance and those subjects?» (No, not at all)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

3 svarande

Small extent»3 100%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

3 svarande

Small extent»3 100%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

3 svarande

Very badly»2 66%
Rather badly»1 33%
Rather well»0 0%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.33

- you said it is an exam but there was Norwegian document about the fullcity case. it is not fair. there must be equal opportunities for all of the student.» (Very badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

3 svarande

Very poor»1 33%
Rather poor»1 33%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»0 0%
I did not seek help»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

3 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 33%
Rather well»1 33%
Very well»1 33%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

11. How was the course workload?

3 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 33%
Adequate»1 33%
High»1 33%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

12. How was the total workload this study period?

3 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 66%
High»0 0%
Too high»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

3 svarande

Poor»3 100%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»0 0%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

- You did not say anything about structure of the report and which aspects of the cases we should focus on about cases but after the presentations you made comments about structures and focuses of the reports. If you said, we could prepare an academically structured report. Additionally you made comments about page amount of the reports however you had not said anything about the length of the report. In the exam you did not wrote on the exam paper regarding which question worth how many points.» (Poor)
- probably the worst course in my life» (Poor)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- nothing. »
- nothing »
- Hopefully nothing»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- You should completely change the course contents and define clear goals for the course whether you will focus on ism or quality management. since name of the program is maritime management, you should focus on practical implications of quality management in the shipping companies as a management level.»
- all»
- Everything»

16. Additional comments

- You should give different cases to each group for case studies. Main points of all reports were the same. I think it is not difficult to find cases since there are a lot of accidents.»
- grading of presentation was not fair at all. there wasnt any instruction for presentation though it was an examination. It was very funny to get some negative feedback from the teacher (Tor Erik) regarding structure of the written report although there wasnt any instruction. Two teacher in one lesson was also very bad. There was a communication problem between teachers and we were quite confused. All in all, this course was too poor.»
- The wholw course was about ISM. As the lecturers said ISM is not quality management. I was eager to learn practical quality management/assurance from a company perspective and not study some boring shipping accidents. This course was one thw worst courses so far. I would claim the teachers were not suited to this course.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från