|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
EDIT: Graphical Interfaces course evaluation, TDA491 / DIT860Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2010-10-21 - 2010-10-31 Antal svar: 13 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 20% Kontaktperson: Victoria Ewers»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?*13 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.38 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?*13 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.46 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.42 Goals and goal fulfilment3. How understandable are the course goals?Chalmers course pm TDA491GU course plan DIT860 Also check the course home page. 13 svarande (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?13 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.84 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?13 svarande(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
- Yes, but the goals where way too low, mostly repetition of other courses.» (Yes, definitely) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?13 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.53 - I was unfortunataly not able to visit the lectures but the exercise sessions didn"t give much valuable input.» (Small extent) 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?13 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.38 - They helped me to pass teh written exam, but otherwise not really..» (Some extent) 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?13 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.3 - Maybe divide the project pdf into one per project. In the end it was rather big and hard to navigate.» (Rather well) Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?13 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.61 - There where lots of opportunities, but the responses where of varying help..» (Rather poor) 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?13 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.46 - Overall, the cooperation went well, but in the dragons gold project we had some problems within the group that made me concentrate more on the group dynamic rather than my own learning.» (Very poorly) Summarizing questions11. What is your general impression of the course?13 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4 - The lectures could be improved by adding more real life examples.» (Fair) 12. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- All different tasks. Exercises, Project, Cooper-test, IP.»- The projects. And the crash course in photoshop (although you didn"t arrange it). » - The exercises, and their relation to the lectures. I appreciated the examples given on the lecture after where some nice examples were presented (and also some bad design). The examples helped a lot. » - The excercises and the projects! Maybe there could be a bit more correlation between the excersises and the lectures. And, 3 hours is not enough to finish the excercises.» - the test!it is the good way to understand the BOOK and reach the course"s goal.» - The exercises, the group project» 13. What should definitely be changed to next year?- The cooper-test should be placed before the dragon"s gold project so that one actually read about the stuff covered. Could easily be covered in the first 3 weeks.»- If having one test, place it in the exam week. Otherwise, have small tests every week so that we keep on track. An idea is to have a mandatory halfway meeting in the individual project as well. » - You should be able to choose your own group for the project work. The exercises should be chosen with better care. To fit the time assigned for them better and with focus on less things, meaning that you actually could perform them really good. I mean just the first search engine exercise could have been a project run through the whole course if you wanted to really make the best you could out of it.» - It was very difficult to grasp what was expected from the Effective Mind exercise. The idea of having a company come and present a task sounded very fun, but it felt as if very different things were asked from us from the company and from the course. » - Some kind of feedback for the exercises should be given, at least an indication of how you"re doing, even without using any feedback tokens.» - The workload. Either having no Cooper-test or having smaller projects. And, I would appreciate, some kind of direction of how a report should be formulated. I thought it was hard to know on what "level" it should be.» - The cooper test could be less fuzzy. More feedback on hand-ins! » 14. Additional comments- Thanks for a great course! »- I think the course was very good, very fun, I learned a lot! One of my favourite courses so far :)» Additional commentsBeräknat jämförelseindex: 0.6 * obligatoriska frågor
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15%