Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

EDIT: Graphical Interfaces course evaluation, TDA491 / DIT860

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-10-21 - 2010-10-31
Antal svar: 13
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 20%
Kontaktperson: Victoria Ewers»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?*

13 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 15%
Around 20 hours/week»4 30%
Around 25 hours/week»7 53%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.38 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?*

13 svarande

0%»1 7%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»3 23%
100%»9 69%

Genomsnitt: 4.46 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.42

Goals and goal fulfilment

3. How understandable are the course goals?

Chalmers course pm TDA491

GU course plan DIT860

Also check the course home page.

13 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

I have not seen/read the course plan until now.»3 23%
The goals are difficult to understand.»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 23%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»8 61%

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

13 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»2 15%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»11 84%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.84

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

13 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»5 38%
Yes, definitely»7 53%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 7%

- Yes, but the goals where way too low, mostly repetition of other courses.» (Yes, definitely)
- I think the examination part was quite heavy, with two projects AND a test.» (Yes, definitely)
- Sometimes I found the statements in the Cooper-test quite fuzzy, with to much room for interpretation which I believed lowered my grade both times I took the test. » (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»2 15%
To some extent»2 15%
Large extent»9 69%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.53

- I was unfortunataly not able to visit the lectures but the exercise sessions didn"t give much valuable input.» (Small extent)
- The supervision was good. Lectures were good but could have more influence on the excercises or the other way around.» (To some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»9 69%
Large extent»3 23%
Great extent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.38

- They helped me to pass teh written exam, but otherwise not really..» (Some extent)
- The course book was only useful for the Cooper-test.» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

13 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»9 69%
Very well»4 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

- Maybe divide the project pdf into one per project. In the end it was rather big and hard to navigate.» (Rather well)
- No good confirmation on received handins, except the mail later on.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 7%
Rather good»4 30%
Very good»7 53%
I did not seek help»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.61

- There where lots of opportunities, but the responses where of varying help..» (Rather poor)
- Some reminders about using the tokens would have been good, the help was there, but I didn"t always remember to use it. » (Very good)
- I don"t know if the token idea worked out for you, but I think I lost mine as soon as I got them. Maybe virtual tokens instead?» (I did not seek help)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

13 svarande

Very poorly»1 7%
Rather poorly»1 7%
Rather well»2 15%
Very well»9 69%
I did not seek coopeation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.46

- Overall, the cooperation went well, but in the dragons gold project we had some problems within the group that made me concentrate more on the group dynamic rather than my own learning.» (Very poorly)
- We had too different backgrounds to work together in this short assignment (Dragons gold). That meant that I who have some previous experience of this kind of design felt it difficult to take it further and learn something new through the cooperation.» (Rather poorly)

Summarizing questions

11. What is your general impression of the course?

13 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 15%
Adequate»1 7%
Good»5 38%
Excellent»5 38%

Genomsnitt: 4

- The lectures could be improved by adding more real life examples.» (Fair)

12. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- All different tasks. Exercises, Project, Cooper-test, IP.»
- The projects. And the crash course in photoshop (although you didn"t arrange it). »
- The exercises, and their relation to the lectures. I appreciated the examples given on the lecture after where some nice examples were presented (and also some bad design). The examples helped a lot. »
- The excercises and the projects! Maybe there could be a bit more correlation between the excersises and the lectures. And, 3 hours is not enough to finish the excercises.»
- the test!it is the good way to understand the BOOK and reach the course"s goal.»
- The exercises, the group project»

13. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The cooper-test should be placed before the dragon"s gold project so that one actually read about the stuff covered. Could easily be covered in the first 3 weeks.»
- If having one test, place it in the exam week. Otherwise, have small tests every week so that we keep on track. An idea is to have a mandatory halfway meeting in the individual project as well. »
- You should be able to choose your own group for the project work. The exercises should be chosen with better care. To fit the time assigned for them better and with focus on less things, meaning that you actually could perform them really good. I mean just the first search engine exercise could have been a project run through the whole course if you wanted to really make the best you could out of it.»
- It was very difficult to grasp what was expected from the Effective Mind exercise. The idea of having a company come and present a task sounded very fun, but it felt as if very different things were asked from us from the company and from the course. »
- Some kind of feedback for the exercises should be given, at least an indication of how you"re doing, even without using any feedback tokens.»
- The workload. Either having no Cooper-test or having smaller projects. And, I would appreciate, some kind of direction of how a report should be formulated. I thought it was hard to know on what "level" it should be.»
- The cooper test could be less fuzzy. More feedback on hand-ins! »

14. Additional comments

- Thanks for a great course! »
- I think the course was very good, very fun, I learned a lot! One of my favourite courses so far :)»

Additional comments

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.42
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.6

* obligatoriska frågor

Kursutvärderingssystem från