Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Ship stability and geometry H10, MMA136
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2010-10-21 - 2010-11-12 Antal svar: 14 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 82% Kontaktperson: martin schreuder»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.14 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 3 | | 21% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 4 | | 28% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 5 | | 35% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 1 | | 7% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 2.5 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 14 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 2 | | 14% |
50%» | | 1 | | 7% |
75%» | | 7 | | 50% |
100%» | | 4 | | 28% |
Genomsnitt: 3.92 - the lectures where very unstructured and hard to follow» (25%)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?14 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 1 | | 7% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 1 | | 7% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 6 | | 42% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 6 | | 42% |
Genomsnitt: 3.21 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.13 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 12 | | 92% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 2.07 - no comment» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)
5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?13 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 8 | | 61% |
Yes, definitely» | | 4 | | 30% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 2.46 - some of the exam questions was hard to follow, you didnt understand the question» (To some extent)
- I think the exam was too difficult compared to the older exams, I would prefer a sheet of the formulas used. Then the passing limits was higher than earlier. That seems odd? Without telling the students about it until it was presented in the thesis.» (To some extent)
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the Lectures been of help for your learning?14 svarande
Small extent» | | 2 | | 14% |
Some extent» | | 5 | | 35% |
Large extent» | | 7 | | 50% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.35 - unstructured» (Small extent)
- Ronnie"s lectures were difficult to follow since he had no structure.» (Some extent)
- The lectures has been good! Sometimes there was too much information on the PP-slides. Difficult to sort out the relevant information.» (Large extent)
7. To what extent has the Design Classes been of help for your learning?14 svarande
Small extent» | | 1 | | 7% |
Some extent» | | 4 | | 28% |
Large extent» | | 7 | | 50% |
Great extent» | | 2 | | 14% |
Genomsnitt: 2.71 - Especially the last one when we used AutoHydro. The program Modelmaker was really poor.» (Large extent)
- they were very nice!!» (Great extent)
8. To what extent has the Tutorials been of help for your learning?14 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 7 | | 50% |
Large extent» | | 6 | | 42% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 2.57 - I think they where a bit slow. I rather have a faster tempo on the tutorials, but thats up to everyone to decide.» (Some extent)
9. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?14 svarande
Small extent» | | 2 | | 14% |
Some extent» | | 6 | | 42% |
Large extent» | | 5 | | 35% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 2.35 - The course litterature was really bad.» (Some extent)
- the book was not good, hard to follow and didnt cover the hole course. Some explanisisons was very hard to understand» (Some extent)
- The course literature is quite poor and should really be renewed. It did not ease the learning and wasn"t that helpful.» (Some extent)
10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?14 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 1 | | 7% |
Rather well» | | 11 | | 78% |
Very well» | | 2 | | 14% |
Genomsnitt: 3.07 - Would prefer more example exams to work with.» (Rather well)
Study climate11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?14 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 5 | | 35% |
Very good» | | 8 | | 57% |
I did not seek help» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 3.71 - Mail conversation worked well and easy to ask questions between/during/after the lectures.» (Very good)
12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?14 svarande
Very poorly» | | 1 | | 7% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 3 | | 21% |
Very well» | | 9 | | 64% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 3.64 13. How was the course workload?14 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 1 | | 7% |
Adequate» | | 11 | | 78% |
High» | | 2 | | 14% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.07 14. How was the total workload this study period?14 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 6 | | 42% |
High» | | 8 | | 57% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.57 - the project in machinery took a lot of time» (High)
Summarizing questions15. What is your general impression of the course?14 svarande
Poor» | | 1 | | 7% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 5 | | 35% |
Good» | | 7 | | 50% |
Excellent» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - I think the course was interesting! But unfortunately I will probably have to redo the exam after Christmas.» (Good)
16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- lectures items, tutorials, exercise problems»
- Better course litterature for example basic ship geometry by Rawson and Tupper.»
- design class with jan»
- The information of the teachers experience in real life situations!»
- The design assignment.»
17. What should definitely be changed to next year?- The course litterature»
- the hole structure of the course. it needs to be tighten up»
- The powerpoints! To much information on the slides. It makes it hard to follow and sort out the relevant parts!»
- Maby some larger homework assignment which gives points to the exam.»
18. Additional comments
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|