|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Advanced Computer Aided Design, PPU080Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2010-10-20 - 2010-11-10 Antal svar: 39 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 43% Kontaktperson: Lars Almefelt»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.38 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.55 - Most of the time could have been spent improving my knowledge of CATIA instead it became alot of time using google, show the basics of all the workbenches you want us to use and then let us expand on that instead.» (Around 30 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?39 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.3 - Attended lectures in the start of the course. Unfortunately they were not so good, too much readin directly from slides, so skipped the last ones and read the slides myself instead. » (50%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?39 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.05 - I am not sure of the goals of the course, I do not believe they were presented. The dichotomy between the project and the lectures also made it difficult to even infer the goals.» (I have not seen/read the goals) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.35 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.91 - I think it is unfair to call it Advanced CAD when one could pass this course without ever having used CATIA before.» (No, the goals are set too low) 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?36 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.27 - Again, not knowing the goals, this is difficult to answer. I do believe, however, that the goal of a CAD course for Mechanical Engineers should be being able to use CAD software in a functional way. The examination seemed more suited for Computer Engineers who would be programming a CAD course. Given my interpretation of what the goals of the course should be, it did not meet these goals.» (No, not at all) 6. Was the setup of the project work good for learning CAD and CAT systems?(e.g. excavator model, extra points for extra tasks, ...)39 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4 - The concept of the project was a great way to learn CAD and CAT. The process of doing solid modeling exercises and then applying our knowledge to the project worked very well. Many of the processes became trial by fire, though, as we were not taught surface modeling or most of the extra tasks. Instead of applying knowledge that had acquired, tasks often became trial and error, or desperately searching outside avenues (random internet sources) to try to acquire this knowledge. Many of the teaching assistants were unfamiliar with the knowledge required to complete the extra tasks, and thus within the context of the course, course material and teaching assistants that was literally no way to acquire the necessary knowledge.» (To some extent) Teaching and course administration7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?39 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.87 - Mainly because tutors have been, as I understand it, told NOT to help. Rather advise that we try find the information ourselfs. this has applied even for the simplest of questions. I understand that they are not supposed to do it for us, but they should at least be able to tell us what to do when we find that we have done something wrong.» (Small extent) 8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?39 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.97 - Some of the other material that was suppose to help us with certain extra tasks was had faulty information on more than one occasion, the main one being how to import files from CATIA to RDnT. For example the paper suggests "Load Abaqus" files, a format that CATIA doesnt even know!! » (Small extent) 9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?39 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.33 - No complaints.» (Rather well) Study climate10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?38 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.63 - Help was available during exercises. There was often a long wait due to the amount of help needed by students and the overlap of demonstration and help time. Sometimes I would put my name on a long list of people needing help and demonstrating tasks, wait half an hour, only to find that the person trying to help me did not know the function I needed help with.» (Rather poor) 11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?39 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.74 12. How was the course workload?38 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.18 - Could have been harder» (Low) 13. How was the total workload this study period?38 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.42 - to much PDM» (High) Summarizing questions14. What is your general impression of the course?39 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.46 - I am not sure what the purpose of the course was. If it was to teach us how to use CATIA, I think that it should have focused on that. If that was the goal we should have cut out the theoretical parts and instead had lectures and exercises that would have been useful to us in completing the project as assigned. If the goal of the course was to understand the theory behind CAD, it should not be mandatory, and there should be no project. The lectures also need to provide some insight that the slides cannot.» (Poor) 15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Depends on the goal of the course, but I believe the concept of the project can be preserved and improved.»- project and extra tasks» - the catia project» - Assignment» - The project» - the project» - The project» - project» - The project work» - The project » - Course Syllabus & Goals are good» - the project can be easier, to learn basics of catia,» - The FEA and Pipe/tube design must be serious consider to get more knowledge about it» - The tasks» - The extrapoints for higher grade» - Project work» - Catia project» - The point system felt good and clear and structured. work more for a higher grade.» - The project» - The tutorial in parametric modeling.» - The project work» 16. What should definitely be changed to next year?- The exam should be either changed or completely removed. No CAD theory. More exercises that teach us how to do the tasks necessary for the project. Some insight in lectures. Separate project help and demonstration.»- Little bit less focus on RDnT and make sure that the helpers know what they are doing.» - The contents of the exam.» - way of teaching (lectures)» - the exam is useless. Have nothing to do with CAD.» - Although it"s great to Geometry Assurance in the course, it"s unacceptable to have an application that first of all is very buggy (graphical problems on all chalmers computers), is poorly documented and which cad instructors barley know how to use themselves. Also many of the subjects brought up in the course feels like they were modern 15 years ago, In general the content of the course need to be up to date and make since otherwise it better not mention it at all ... » - lectures could include more practical examples» - I think the exam should be changed (or maybe removed). I learnt a lot more from the project. Would be better to make the project a bit "bigger" and skip the exam.» - RD&T needs to be changed..some other application in catia itself would have been much better.» - The instructions for the RDnT program. I managed to do the exercises, but I did not quite understand what I was doing and why (even though I did go to the lecture about it).» - The exam seeing as it is pointless and irrelevant » - Regarding Project we need some more time» - learning RD&T is not possible in short time, maybewe teacher must introduce this software sooner in the class.» - The RDnT content (ex. presentation, exercise, document) is not so clear, very hard to understand » - Parametrization should be replace by knowledge ware as knowlwdge ware include the parametrization which very good» - HELP WITH THE EXTRA TASKS!» - More information about the RD&T, that was really hard to understand.» - couse exame» - Increased duration of the project» - That the models were supposed to be shown to teacher instead of upploaded to the server could be clearer. Also an space on a server could be used to keep the RD&T software since it is not installed on the computers. » - The posibility to ask questions about the extra tasks. » - Take away the exman or make it meaningful.» - The self-teaching approach to the project. I say skip that kind of project and make sure the students know how to build their models in a clever way instead.» - Computer graphics part of the course felt very shallow and unrelated to what was learned in the project and other parts of the course. » 17. Additional comments- To compensate for the lack of final exam add more tasks to the project or add another project»- Overall Opinion the entire course is very good and i"m really satisfied with that» - If the publication of parts in same assembly is include then it will make student to think more for doing extra» - Overall a very good course but the difference in help between the mandatory and extra task was BAD!» - What happened to the rapid prototype? No info at all about when and where what i"ve seen.» 18. What master program do you attend?39 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.92 - Quality and Operations Management» (Other)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21%