|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
IDE:Theory and Methodology (2010), PPU090Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2010-10-25 - 2010-11-05 Antal svar: 19 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 45% Kontaktperson: Oskar Rexfelt»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.31 - For the last assignment, this number was closer to 40 hours/week» (Around 20 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.52 - I was ill a few times.» (100%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.63 - It was acceptable for this type of project. However it could have been a good solution to have tutorors actually ask you to limit the scope - in the end this course took a lot of hard work.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.1 - Counted in time, the goals were set too high. The main problem was the simultaneous delivery of allt he deliverables. It would have been better to have a more theory focused start-up and then focus on the project later on. But probably something should be cut also.» (No, the goals are set too high) 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.63 - I consider the final project as a examination» (To some extent) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.84 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.57 - we did not have any literature» (Small extent) 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.42 - The student webbpage doesn"t work to the extent it should.» (Rather badly) Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.73 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.57 11. How was the course workload?19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.21 12. How was the total workload this study period?19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.57 Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.11 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The method research part. The "flying thing"-task.»- Most of the workshop, assignments and presentations.» - The method binder.» - Good with going through the methods. Look forward to getting the "book" with all of them.» - Lecturers from severay different areas» - the distribution of the assignments over the course period. » - Almost all of it.» - Assignment 4» - The applied project work is so useful!» - All interesting discussions. I lile the way that the literature seminars were organized.» 15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- The final assignment was a bit heavy. It was good but would need more time to be useful.»- The methods research or review was not really worthwhile. An idea might be to do it so the students actually can benefit from it in the future, do a booklet for own use or comparable.» - Some methods should be given some materials to refer,not just by presentations of students» - -» - nothing» - No comment» - Fewer articles, maybe 3 compulsory articles and a range of articles to choose from. The personal reflective report just became another heavy delivery. I didn"t see the point of it and I can"t immagine that the work of correcting and giving feedback will be much fun either. Better to have a literature seminar if the articles are important + a one-page contribution report on the project work maybe.» 16. Additional comments- I think the feedback from assignment 2 was very useful and good, but I feel like the way the course is built up gives a bit unnecessarily high workload on the examinator.»- I wish I would have had even more time to put into the final assignment, it was very interesting tu dig deeper into a subject. » - I think I learned mostly through our project. We read relatively much to solve them, and it"s good to have get the overview of what is happening today and what has been happening for the last 30 years in this field. » - Fun course, but it doesn"t feel satisfactory to put so much effort into something that in the end is all imaginary and only gives you a grade on a paper. If the scope could me limited slightly, it would be great!»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21%