Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Introduction to microsystems packaging, MKM105, MPMIC, HT2010, MKM105

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-10-13 - 2010-10-30
Antal svar: 10
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 45%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

10 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 30%
Around 20 hours/week»4 40%
Around 25 hours/week»3 30%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

10 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»2 20%
50%»3 30%
75%»3 30%
100%»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Johan Liu"s english is horribly bad, which made the lectures bad and hard to get something useful out of.» (25%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

10 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 10%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 50%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»9 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

9 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 22%
Yes, definitely»5 55%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»3 30%
Some extent»2 20%
Large extent»5 50%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

- Much of the lectures I attended seemed quite chaotic and unorganized. Johan"s bad english didn"t help either. Much of the lecture time consisted of trying to make sense of what Johan was trying to say.» (Small extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 20%
Large extent»6 60%
Great extent»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

10 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 10%
Rather well»4 40%
Very well»5 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- The time announcements for i.e. visit to RUAG was really bad, with change just before the original time. And likewise with the announcing of the 3rd lab, announcing it like a day or two in advance? » (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

9 svarande

Very poor»1 11%
Rather poor»1 11%
Rather good»2 22%
Very good»4 44%
I did not seek help»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

10 svarande

Very poorly»1 10%
Rather poorly»1 10%
Rather well»2 20%
Very well»6 60%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

11. How was the course workload?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»7 70%
High»3 30%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

- The workload it self is OK, but with the literature study, seriously? 15pages report on a topic that in many cases were not even close to related to the course? This is clearly there only to increase the workload of the course.» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 30%
High»7 70%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

10 svarande

Poor»1 10%
Fair»1 10%
Adequate»2 20%
Good»6 60%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

- The course seems to be in a developing stage, many interesting topics are presented, but much of the course seems to be just thrown together without effort and planing.» (Poor)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- the project is a very good way to learn more about a specific topic, so i think it should be preserved. the labs also were very interesting.»
- The coupling to actual fabrication! Great to see a course that takes up problems of manufacturing and production costs etc. Really good to let students see what influences the designs of electronics have on the actual fabrication of just those designs!»
- Industrial vists, more if possible»
- Can follow the same pattern»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- the presentations timing was not good at all. there were too many for so short time. i suggest that they should be broken down into 2 or more sessions in order to pay more attention to them and make them lighter both for the professors and the students.»
- Literature study!!!! The topics must be related to the course! And at least 15pages report is way too much for this, especially when many topics were so unrelated to the course it self.»
- Interaction at class between teacher and students. One of the weakest points of classes in this course»
- Little bit interaction between the students»

16. Additional comments

Kursutvärderingssystem från