ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Fiber Optical Communication, MCC100, MPMPE, HT2010, MCC100

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-10-13 - 2010-10-30
Antal svar: 9
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 64%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

9 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 11%
Around 20 hours/week»4 44%
Around 25 hours/week»2 22%
Around 30 hours/week»2 22%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.55

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

9 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»4 44%
100%»5 55%

Genomsnitt: 4.55

- I would have attended 100%, but I had 2 courses overlapped» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

9 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 11%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 55%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.11

- I only remember some parts of the goals» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»8 88%
No, the goals are set too high»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.11

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

9 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»5 55%
Yes, definitely»3 33%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.55

- The exam was to time consuming, since non of the problems were of the same kind that had been solved in the tutorial seasons.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 33%
Large extent»6 66%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- very good lectures» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 33%
Large extent»5 55%
Great extent»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

- The lab manuals are written very instructively. » (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

9 svarande

Very badly»1 11%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»7 77%
Very well»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.88

- One of the home assignment got delayed all the time so time had to spent with it close and in the exam week» (Very badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

9 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 11%
Very good»8 88%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.88

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

9 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»3 33%
Very well»5 55%
I did not seek cooperation»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

11. How was the course workload?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 11%
Adequate»3 33%
High»4 44%
Too high»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

- It would be good if not all deadlines for assignments were in the end of the course.» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 44%
High»4 44%
Too high»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

Course-specific questions:

13. How would you rate the lectures given by Peter Andrekson?

8 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Mediocre»0 0%
OK»0 0%
Good»6 75%
Excellent»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 4.25

- good start and good conclusion» (Excellent)

14. How would you rate the lectures given by Pontus Johannisson?

9 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Mediocre»0 0%
OK»0 0%
Good»4 44%
Excellent»5 55%

Genomsnitt: 4.55

- very good teacher» (Excellent)

15. How would you rate the lectures given by Guo-Wei Lu?

9 svarande

Poor»4 44%
Mediocre»1 11%
OK»3 33%
Good»1 11%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.11

16. How would you rate the lectures given by Per Olof Hedekvist?

8 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Mediocre»1 12%
OK»1 12%
Good»5 62%
Excellent»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

Summarizing questions

17. What is your general impression of the course?

9 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 11%
Good»7 77%
Excellent»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 4

- intereseting and useful course dealing with practical issues in optical fiber networks» (Excellent)

18. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Home assignments, are quite good, helping for understanding. We had so many old exams, so we solved many questions before the exam which was so helpful for the exam and understanding.»
- assignments, tutorials »
- Everything is ok, without the "Nonlinearity" topic.»
- most of the course was useful and should be kept»

19. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Time of the exam was short! at least half an hour more was needed. everyone agrees with that.»
- Problem Solving technique should be improved. which is required by this course»
- more lectures should be given by Peter»
- There should have more dicussion about "Nonlinearity". »
- The material on sources can be improved to somehow fit better into the context of the course»
- The exam was way to big for four hours, I did not even have time to answer on everything and found errors that I did not have time to go back and correct.»

20. Additional comments

- Thanks to Ekawit, he was so helpful and friendly.»
- It is a good and well organized course. The lectures were good, especially those given by Pontus. HA 3 was a bit too time-consuming in relation to the number of bonus points. The quality of the labs and tutorials was not as high as for the ordinary lectures. Especially the tutorials could have been improved. Lab exercises should be better prepared to make sure that things work they way they should.»
- Interesting course!»
- Thanks to all the lecturers and assistants for the good course.»
- The labs could be made more interesting if they didn"t involve that much measurements. It was to much measuring some parameters, then change the setup a bit and then measure it all over again. It would be good if the derivations of all formulas could be done as homeassignment bofore the labs instead of during the labs, to make the lab less time consuming.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från