Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Design of microwave monolithic integrated circuits (MMIC), EME110, MPMPE, HT2010, EME110

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-10-13 - 2010-10-30
Antal svar: 5
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 31%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

5 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»1 20%
Around 25 hours/week»1 20%
Around 30 hours/week»3 60%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

5 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»0 0%
100%»5 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

5 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 20%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»0 0%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 80%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

4 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»4 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

4 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»0 0%
Yes, definitely»3 75%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»4 80%
Great extent»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- Morteza is very helpful, but would be nice to have more lectures with Herbert» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 60%
Large extent»2 40%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- A book would definitely be a big plus. It"s hard to navigate the binder and not very comfortable to read.» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

5 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»2 40%
Very well»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

5 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 20%
Very good»4 80%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

5 svarande

Very poorly»1 20%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 20%
Very well»3 60%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

11. How was the course workload?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 20%
High»2 40%
Too high»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.2

12. How was the total workload this study period?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
High»4 80%
Too high»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 4.2

Course-specific questions:

13. Did the computer labs help clarify the lectures?

5 svarande

No»0 0%
Yes»5 100%

Genomsnitt: 2

- The labs were helpful to some extent but they often gave too much away. In the end you just copy/pasted the schematic from the lab and didn"t understand much. It would be helpful to have a better introduction to the design kit at an earlier stage. Layout work etc.» (Yes)

14. Do you prefer to have a less extended project work and instead spend more time on the theoretical parts?

5 svarande

No»4 80%
Yes»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 1.2

- totally the opposite» (No)

15. How much of the text material provided in the binder did you use?

5 svarande

less than 25%»1 20%
less than 50%»0 0%
ess than 75%»0 0%
All of it»4 80%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

Summarizing questions

16. What is your general impression of the course?

5 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»4 80%
Excellent»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 4.2

- The course is very hard.» (Excellent)

17. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Final Project Work.»
- labs, homeworks, quizes and project are good»
- the last lecture, it even was missing more informations. Maybe there were some more in other courses explained.»
- Project»

18. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Deadlines for the assignments should be extended.»
- We need more time to do project»
- would be nice, if for the circuits fabrication part there was someone who really is involved in the processing. »

19. Additional comments

- Some parts were rather poor explained, was trying to find in books,publications, the teoretical part was missing in all of the given sources. What if some publications in the binder were included? »

Kursutvärderingssystem från