Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Intellectual Property Strategies, CIP057

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-10-13 - 2010-10-20
Antal svar: 14
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 32%
Kontaktperson: Anneli Hildenborg»
Klass: Övriga

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

14 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»1 7%
Around 25 hours/week»1 7%
Around 30 hours/week»5 35%
At least 35 hours/week»7 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.28

- Big assignments, few days! However, realy valuable for the education and learning processes.» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

14 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»1 7%
100%»13 92%

Genomsnitt: 4.92

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

14 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 21%
The goals are difficult to understand»2 14%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 42%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 2.64

- This is one of the few setbacks with this course. No cours syllabus....» (I have not seen/read the goals)
- The course PM is not up to standard» (The goals are difficult to understand)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

13 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»13 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Based on my experience from the course....» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

13 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»0 0%
Yes, definitely»0 0%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»13 100%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Please wait until after the exam before sending out the course evaluation!» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)
- The exam is after the due-date for this evaluation» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)
- Have not been examined yet. » (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)
- Hard to answer before the exam.» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 7%
Large extent»7 50%
Great extent»6 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

- Lars Andersson and Ulf Petrusson were great but the young ones were ill-prepared» (Large extent)
- Ulf and Lars are excelent.» (Great extent)
- The teachers have been fanatstic in explaining in a way to make all of us understand.» (Great extent)
- The course introduced me to the field of law, and so now I have knowledge on the material taught in the course, but also a general understanding of a completely new field. » (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»2 14%
Some extent»1 7%
Large extent»8 57%
Great extent»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

- Very litle time to read.....» (Small extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

14 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 14%
Rather well»10 71%
Very well»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 3

- I think it"s very important for our learning process that the lecture slides get distributed quickly after (or preferably before) the lecture. » (Rather badly)
- Normally a little bit late with information on GUL....» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

14 svarande

Very poor»1 7%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»5 35%
Very good»8 57%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

- Best way is to ask classmates at the moment....which is good but there should be another opportunitie as well.» (Very poor)
- Could have had a "summary" lesson. Our last lesson could also have been closer to the exam, so you don"t engage too much into the new course. The new course also gets affected, since everybody prioritize reading on the old course. » (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

14 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 7%
Very well»13 92%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.92

11. How was the course workload?

14 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 21%
High»11 78%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.78

- There isn"t enough time to just sit and read.» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

14 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 7%
Adequate»4 28%
High»8 57%
Too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.64

- I had expected higher workload and parallell assignments» (Low)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

14 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 14%
Good»8 57%
Excellent»4 28%

Genomsnitt: 4.14

- One of the best I"ve attended at Chalmers so far.....» (Excellent)
- It opend a new way of thinking for me and it was really good to have it as the first course.» (Excellent)
- As mentioned earlier, the course introduced me to a completely new field and was therefore very developing for me. It was also taught in a very clear and structured way with the theme weeks, which was very appreciated and facilitated the learning process. » (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Ulf and Lars and the few lessons at Chalmers, Handels is congested!»
- Lars Andersson, the exercises and the quizes»
- The teachers.»
- all of it»
- Lars Andersson»
- Lars and Ulf as lecturers, the theme weeks and the way they are clearly structured, the hand-ins each week.»
- The exercises.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Guest lecturers should focus more on their areas of expertice and try to coordinate their lecture, so that repetitions can be minimized. »
- Get other lectors for the introduction to patent and trademark rights»
- Skip handels if possible!»
- Don"t have young guest lecturers or Ph. D students to explain the theoretical framework. Use them to do explain it in practise instead. Often the young lecturers have not gathered the experience to know how to teach the basics. And do not accept that a guest lecturer sits down behind the computer and reads the bullets on the slides and nothing more (Jessika Olsén). When you pay them money you should be able to require a good presentation.»
- More time to be able to just sit and read and study during the day.»
- Let the guest lecturers present knowledge from their business life and leave the basic stuf to the educated teachers.»
- A couple of the less experienced lecturers were not up to par. Perhaps they can work on certain lecturing skills until next year. Also, a way to have the slides uploaded quickly after each lecture should be found. »
- The patent week. »

16. Additional comments

- Great course!»

Kursutvärderingssystem från