|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
TEK145 Quality and Operations Management 2010, TEK145Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2010-10-14 - 2010-10-28 Antal svar: 23 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 60% Kontaktperson: Nina Edh» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers Klass: Övriga Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Industriell ekonomi 300 hp
Your own effort1. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.95 - Could have been more lecure hours, sometimes just 2-4h/week» (75%-100%) General questions on the course2. What is your general opinion of the course?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.34 3. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.78 - Could have more lectures on each subject than having one.» (Some extent) 4. How was the course workload?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.86 - Not really much to do for being a full time course» (Too low) 5. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4 6. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.34 - The last week it was had for the people who wasn"t on the lectures to find assignments etc» (Rather well) 7. What is your overall impression of the weekly course?Matrisfråga- The visit at SFT was great but the one at Volvo didn"t give as much...» Week 1: Introduction to master´,s program in Quality and Operations Management - Anna Moses
Genomsnitt: 4.6 Week 1.1: How was Karin Lindqvist as a lecturer (Group Development)?
Genomsnitt: 4.13 Week 1.2: How useful has the work with group contracts been for your group?
Genomsnitt: 3.43 Week 1.3: How did you like Boda Borg (team building exercise)?
Genomsnitt: 4.27 Week 2: Operations Strategy - Mats Winroth
Genomsnitt: 4.13 Week 3: Quality Management - Andreas Hellström
Genomsnitt: 4.4 Week 4: Product Development Dilemmas - Lars Trygg
Genomsnitt: 4.45 Week 5: Service Operations Management - Marku Ejenäs/Jon Rognes/John Söderström
Genomsnitt: 4.15 Week 6: Design for Quality - Ida Gremyr
Genomsnitt: 4.4 Week 7: Improvement Processes - Sverker Alänge
Genomsnitt: 4.42 8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?Matrisfråga- The literature for the last week should have been in the PM, sometimes you have other thing to do in the evening, and then its hard to find time to read two chapters to the day after if you don"t have a chance to prepare.
Dont know what to write at week one, there were no literature...» Week 1: Introduction to master´,s program in Quality and Operations Management - Anna Moses
Genomsnitt: 2.23 Week 2: Operations Strategy - Mats Winroth
Genomsnitt: 3.04 Week 3: Quality Management - Andreas Hellström
Genomsnitt: 3.13 Week 4: Product Development Dilemmas - Lars Trygg
Genomsnitt: 3.04 Week 5: Service Operations Management - Marku Ejenäs/Jon Rognes/John Söderström
Genomsnitt: 3.13 Week 6: Design for Quality - Ida Gremyr
Genomsnitt: 3 Week 7: Improvement Processes - Sverker Alänge
Genomsnitt: 3.17 9. Do you have any opinions on a preferred sequence of the weekly themes?- I think they are quite good as they are, there might be more sharing between teachers since they weren"t all aware of what we had learned before their week came.»- OK as it was.» - No, its good now» - No.» - It worked out fine the way it was» - I think it was good.» Summarizing questions10. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Study-trips to learn about companies and possible workplaces. »- Lars Trygg» - The the good teachers!» - First week» - Professors Guest lectures» - the study visit to SKF was very good! » - The weekly themes.» - Scholdice and Le Petit Chef was good!» - The first week gave a good opportunity to get to know the other group members in a relaxed way that benefitted the communication in our work as a team during the whole study period. Very nice!» - Course divided into the six weeks, having one project each week.» - the first week as warm up week must be kept since it helped a lot for new student to get know to each other. » - The litterature seminars, the fact that the projects are not graded.» - First introductury week, and I like the case studies» - 1. That you have presentations on Fridays so you dont have to work during the weekend. 2. Sverker Alänge"s practical exercises.» 11. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Communication between different teachers.»- Baldridge case did not give a very structured learning experience. Well it was great to see in practice how a quality award is structured but the case was hard to answer and had no correct answer. For me that is equal to a lack of learning experience. Comepare this with the harward case in the serive week, that had a clear goal: teach us focused operations. I do believe that that actually gave me something of value compared to doing a sot/cornerstone investigation on the leadershiopdimension of the application. = Very subjective!» - The sevice week was a bit messy with all the different teachers that probably had not talked to each others before. Its a bit hard to do a presentation for the board if noone told ypu that it was supposed to be for the board...» - should have options of having more than one book for reference. can also include operations research as a part of operations management» - The study visit to Volvo was a waste of time, the lecture there was ok (but could be held at chalmers) but the visit in their test department had nothing to do with what they had spoken about, or this course! the guest lectur from volvo in week 6 had some interesting things to say but it took me a long time to understand what she said since her pronunciation/English wasn"t very good, I understand that this may be out of your control but if we can"t understand what is said then why should we even bother to come? » - The groups, change the groups every week. » - Sverker should have shorter lectures. The layout of the seminars should be standardized and the teacher should always give pointers an not only student-group-discussions. Flagstaff was not so good.» - The articles could be uploaded to the course website.» - Maybe a little more precise projects, in Op S and Imp proc.» - Never full class for presentations, at least not when we all have the same case.» 12. Additional comments- Nice introduction to the programme. Good with all industry visits. MORE OF THAT!»- Interesting course!» - I hope that the knowledge gained during lectures will be useful on the exam, specially since there were a lot of mandatory lectures » - Can discuss about question papers and solutions of previous years. Can give grades to group activity so that the quality of the presentations can be improved. Can have a general class to insist on how a presentation should be given from a corporate point of view from experts.» - Over all a good course =)» - Would be good if the groups could present in different order each week so that all groups can see each other at least some time.» - Every Swede knows about Maj-Britt»
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0%