Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Graphical interfaces, Lp1 HT-10, TDA491 / DIT860

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-10-14 - 2010-10-21
Antal svar: 10
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 15%
Kontaktperson: Victoria Ewers»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?*

10 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 10%
Around 20 hours/week»3 30%
Around 25 hours/week»4 40%
Around 30 hours/week»2 20%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.7 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?*

10 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 10%
75%»2 20%
100%»7 70%

Genomsnitt: 4.6 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.65

Goals and goal fulfilment

3. How understandable are the course goals?

10 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 20%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 20%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»6 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

8 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»8 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

10 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 40%
Yes, definitely»4 40%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Teaching and course administration

6. What is your opinion about the lectures?

10 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 20%
Good»6 60%
Excellent»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Goes through stuff that you have thought of before, but don"t know why that is. Great satisfaction!» (Excellent)

7. What is your opinion about the labs?

10 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 20%
Good»7 70%
Excellent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- Would have liked to get more feedback on them.» (Fair)
- Perhaps fewer labs would be better. They felt a bit repetitive.» (Fair)
- The first and last were the funniest.» (Good)

8. What is your opinion about the home assignments?

10 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 20%
Good»6 60%
Excellent»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Only remember one, that was fun!» (Excellent)

9. What is your opinion about the controllers and instruments workshop?

6 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»3 50%
Good»2 33%
Excellent»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- what"s that?» (?)
- Don"t know any» (?)
- I don"t understand the question» (Fair)

10. What is your opinion about the mini projects?

10 svarande

Poor»1 10%
Fair»2 20%
Good»5 50%
Excellent»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- The one in group was the best, good motivation with a game.» (Good)

11. What is your opinion about the studios?

10 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»3 30%
Good»4 40%
Excellent»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 3

12. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»2 20%
To some extent»3 30%
Large extent»5 50%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.3

13. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»1 10%
Some extent»6 60%
Large extent»2 20%
Great extent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.3

- Only for the test.» (Some extent)
- About Face is very good and interesting!» (Great extent)

14. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

10 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 20%
Rather well»4 40%
Very well»4 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- The written exam was changed from 09.00 to 08.30, and the homepage was only updated on one of the two locations that stated the time. There should at least have been under "news" at the first page, since I checked that regularly.» (Rather badly)
- The course website should better reflect the course material, i.e., it"s an opportunity to showcase the principles covered in the course. Currently, it violates them more than reinforces them.» (Rather well)

Study climate

15. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 10%
Rather good»3 30%
Very good»6 60%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- I felt Sus was more into criticizing than giving thoughtful feedback, so I felt that a lot of students didn"t want to use their feedback tokens because of that» (Rather poor)

16. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

10 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 10%
Very well»9 90%
I did not seek coopeation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

Summarizing questions

17. What is your general impression of the course?

10 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 20%
Good»6 60%
Excellent»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 4

- The literature was excellent, so was Eric and Marcus. Sus could be more constructive I think.» (Adequate)

18. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Exercises and projects»
- The course book»
- The project model works well. Practice is the best way to learn any kind of design.»
- Pretty much everything.»

19. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- More feedback on exercises. All exercise should have a presentation session like exercise 5.»
- More feedback on the labs.»
- The weekly assignments should be graded in my opinion»
- Given that it"s a short course and the About Face 3 book focuses mostly on interaction design, the course could be changed to focus solely on interaction design without any visual design...it could/should be a separate course.»
- The iPhone lecture should be about smartphones as a whole. The cooper test should be earlier to make sure the students learn the content before the Dragon"s Gold project, that would help a lot.»

20. Additional comments

- the token system for feedback was just confusing.»

Additional comments

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.65
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.66

* obligatoriska frågor

Kursutvärderingssystem från