ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Computer graphics, Lp1, HT-10, TDA361 / DIT220

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-10-14 - 2010-10-31
Antal svar: 21
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 20%
Kontaktperson: Victoria Ewers»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?*

21 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 6 28%

Around 20 hours/week» 8 38%

Around 25 hours/week» 5 23%

Around 30 hours/week» 1 4%

At least 35 hours/week» 1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.19 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?*

21 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 4 19%

50%» 0 0%

75%» 11 52%

100%» 6 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.9 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.04

Goals and goal fulfilment

3. How understandable are the course goals?

21 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 10 47%

The goals are difficult to understand» 1 4%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 3 14%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 7 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

15 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 0 0%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 14 93%

No, the goals are set too high» 1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.06

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

21 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

No, not at all» 0 0%

To some extent» 3 14%

Yes, definitely» 4 19%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 9 42%

- One week(ish) left!» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)
- It should be more exams up there to study on, it is only 1 now» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

21 svarande

Small extent» 2 9%

To some extent» 7 33%

Large extent» 8 38%

Great extent» 4 19%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- a bit unorganized. bad time management» (To some extent)
- Helpful when available, although scheduling issues prevented me from attending most lectures. The lectures I did see where broad and interesting, although the lecturer should probably be mindful of not letting swedish slip in every now and then.» (Large extent)
- The lectures sometimes were a bit too complicated and fast.» (Large extent)
- Good lectures, the slides are a little messy though, so when I missed one lecture it was difficult to understand everything.» (Great extent)
- I would say that both lectures and tutorials were extremely useful.» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

21 svarande

Small extent» 4 19%

Some extent» 9 42%

Large extent» 5 23%

Great extent» 3 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

- The book is hard to understand, an easier book should be better to start with, and then move on to this one in the advanced course maybe» (Small extent)
- Didn"t buy the book.» (Small extent)
- Course literature was chosen very well but the materials were hard to understand (slides)» (Some extent)
- have not bought the book» (Some extent)
- I bought the course book but never had time to read it. However, links to specifications were useful.» (Some extent)
- One of the best course books I"ve had.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

21 svarande

Very badly» 0 0%

Rather badly» 4 19%

Rather well» 10 47%

Very well» 7 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

- There was too few instructions on what to read. A better description of compulsary book content is needed if lecture attendance is optional.» (Rather badly)
- Labs were a bit messy. The code we were given to work with was often confusing.» (Rather badly)
- It sais on the website "website for previous exams" but the link is dead» (Rather badly)
- Good with lecture slides on the home page. The schedule was completely re-made the first weeks so that was a bit confusing.» (Rather well)
- Nothing to comment on. Web page could use some organizing, it"d be especially nice if the bits still in swedish were translated, but it"s not much of an issue and the page is better than most.» (Rather well)
- Sometimes the workload was high for assistants, meaning it was hard to get help or to present tutorial solutions.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

21 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 1 4%

Rather good» 10 47%

Very good» 10 47%

I did not seek help» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

- It was too few computers for the tutorials, and the assistants didnt had time to help everyone, and had no time for questions» (Rather poor)
- Suggesting better queue system.» (Rather good)
- During the tutorials one assistant was rather rude when asked. (Ola)» (Rather good)
- Good with so many TA:s per group, given the frequent need for assistance» (Very good)
- I really appreciated the attitude of course assistants who sought every student to thoroughly understand the tutorials, and 3D graphics in general.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

21 svarande

Very poorly» 0 0%

Rather poorly» 2 9%

Rather well» 4 19%

Very well» 13 61%

I did not seek coopeation» 2 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

- Somewhat out of sync with my lab partner, otherwise well» (Rather well)
- I arrived to Göteborg two weeks after the course had started and decided to proceed on my own rather than to try finding a lab partner in haste.» (I did not seek coopeation)

Summarizing questions

11. What is your general impression of the course?

21 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 1 4%

Adequate» 6 28%

Good» 7 33%

Excellent» 7 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.95

- The lecturer is very friendly and has a decent knowledge about recent literature. However, his ability to present course content could be improved. Slides are very bad structured. more than 50 slide pages per slide without page numbers and jumping between topics, we can not see where we are. Besides it is very hard to study alone those course materials.» (Adequate)
- Interesting subject, moreso than I assumed beforehand. I"ll probably take the follow up courses later» (Good)
- I got inspired to read the advanced course...» (Excellent)
- A great intro into 3D graphics!» (Excellent)

12. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The laborations, tutorials.»
- The practical part.»
- The teacher, the course book»
- Putting slides on course page, the repetition lecture just before the exam, the laborations.»
- Course literature»
- Dunno :/»
- Tutorials!»

13. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- More reading instructions. What chapters to read etc.»
- Lecture layout.»
- course slides, -> better structure, clearer content. more self studiable slides»
- Schemat borde vara bättre planerat så man slipper flytta om allt i läsvecka två. Det skulle vara bra om man kunde lägga in en eller två extra föreläsningar någon gång under kursen istället för att dra över 10-20 minuter per föreläsning. Jag ville gärna sitta kvar och lyssna, men kunde inte alltid.»
- The labs should be revised.»
- The tutorials, while very good, all tended to cover the exact same ground. I"m quit familiar with the Phong lighting model, shadow mapping and cube mapping but clearly there are diminishing returns from doing them all 3 times. I would very much have appreciated some of the tutorials instead focusing on ray tracing, spatial hierarchies and application-level systems in general, instead of 3 different ones on shaders.»
- Should put more focus on tutorials, and tutorials or assignments for each part in the course, not only the first weeks»
- add raytracing to the labs. maybe one lab in POV ray?»
- Some of the slides should be looked over since they are not always correct and some more explanation on the slides about the pictures would be helpful.»
- Not sure.»

14. Additional comments

- I got very difficulty understanding slides alone. Lecturer presents more than what is in the slides. If one misses a lecture, it is very difficult to understand it by reading slides. More material and more explanatory slides are what the course need.»
- Skulle uppskatta om det fanns mint två gamla tentor på kurshemsidan (finns bara en nu).»
- A very good course, at least the bits for which I could attend. That"s not a criticism: it"s not your fault I"m TA:ing on Wednesdays.»

Additional comments

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.04
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.51

* obligatoriska frågor

Kursutvärderingssystem från