Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Advanced topics in networks and distributed systems, Lp1 HT-10, DAT145 / DIT662

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-10-14 - 2010-11-05
Antal svar: 16
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 40%
Kontaktperson: Victoria Ewers»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?*

16 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 12%
Around 20 hours/week»10 62%
Around 25 hours/week»3 18%
Around 30 hours/week»1 6%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.18 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?*

16 svarande

0-50%»0 0%
51-74%»2 12%
75-89%»5 31%
90-100%»9 56%

Genomsnitt: 3.43 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- the course was really owesome!» (90-100%)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.81

Goals and goal fulfilment

3. How understandable are the course goals?*

Chalmers course pm DAT145

GU course plan DIT662

16 svarande

I had not seen/read the goals until now.»1 6%
The goals are difficult to understand»3 18%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»7 43%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 31%

Genomsnitt: 3

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

14 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»13 92%
No, the goals are set too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.07

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

16 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»8 50%
Yes, definitely»4 25%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 12%

- I think this time the exam put too much attention on the divide and conquer part» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

- P2P part not good enough others good»
- Not much»
- To some extent.»
- The quality of the lectures were varying.»
- To some extent. How much help the teaching was depended on the different teachers. Tomas" and Wolfgang"s lectures were very good.»
- large»
- quite much»
- Very helpful»
- to a great extent..the course organization,the goals and the deliverables were all interesting »

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

- good»
- For some lecture the literature was perfect but for some of them like P2P it was not acceptable and I had to read a lot of other materials.»
- Too much literature to actually understand what to read before the exam. Instead it seemed that studying the lecture slides was the best option and in that case the concepts was to briefly described to be able to answer the exam questions.»
- A bit unclear what was what was not course literature. The mandatory articles from Wolfgang"s part were interesting and felt very relevant for that particular area.»
- some»
- course slides and book also help me a lot»
- Helpful»
- much on some of the topics»
- good»

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

- not precise enough, could be more clear»
- ok, »
- Pretty good.»
- Good enough»
- The lab approval process has been somewhat lacking. Both with respect to feedback and the time it took to get a response.»
- good»
- I printed every handout »
- Good»
- good»

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

- pretty good»
- ok»
- It was good.»
- Bad. Elad"s mentality that questions should only be answered so that everyone taking the course should be able to take part of the answer just seems lazy. The claim that some assignment were going to receive a big amount of feedback must have been a lie. We did not receive even one sentence of feedback on any of the assignemnts.»
- I did not seek help.»
- rather good»
- pretty good, good teachers and good fellow students»
- Good»
- ample»

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

- good»
- good»
- Excellent. »
- Good enough.»
- good»
- the first matching failed but the second was awesome»
- Very good»
- a nice one»

Summarizing questions

11. What is your general impression of the course?

16 svarande

Poor»3 18%
Fair»1 6%
Adequate»6 37%
Good»6 37%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.93

- Too unstructured.» (Poor)
- The impression varies a lot between the different topics and teachers. Tomas and Wolfgang were "excellent" while I would rate the others "adequate". The P2P and sensor networks part needs to be more focused. As it was now there were lots of slides and lots of terms and small facts but not much that really stuck since it was hard to get a good overview of the subjects. The number of topics in those two lectures should probably be decreased with each topic given more time. The self-stabilization part was interesting but it would be nice with a clearer connection to actual distributed systems with real examples. The part as it was now got a bit too algorithmic and parts of what was taught is maybe better left to the algorithms courses. » (Adequate)
- maybe less prove of algorithm will be more favorable?» (Good)
- near to excellent... its really a pretty nice summary and spice to my knowledge and of course a lot of new things» (Good)

12. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- the parallel programming should be extended a bit »
- Tomas" and Wolfgang"s lectures.»
- Great to be able to choose 4 out of 6 subjects in the assignments.»
- exercises»
- all»
- the subjects choice is really good»

13. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- I feel self stabilization and physical layer not much related to our master program, we could have more related and useful topics!»
- this course may be good if just have one teacher..»
- Why are arbitrary group"s assignments being corrected during a lecure? That feedback is only relevant to the group it belongs to since the assignments obviously was poorly performed. It would have been another thing if some well performed assignments were choosen beforehand to set a good example for others.»
- More feedback on the labs! I know it can be quite time consuming but it would be really nice to get a couple of sentences saying what was good and what I need to work on. A possibility for this course would even be to entirely skip the exam and make the hand-ins individual. The things you work on in labs generally stick much better than what you read to pass an exam.»
- hope there will not be any more bonus exercises missed?»
- --»
- why not to grade the assignments which take so much time and reflect better the amount of study ?»

14. Additional comments

- I think it would be more useful if it be in second term, before summer. its a bit late to start knowing what are the topics in our branch, we can decide sooner and use summer to make a decision or hopefully have a related summer job.»
- A guest lecture from a student that recently has done an exjob in one of the subjects could maybe be interesting.»
- this course is really helpful»
- keep on it !»

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.81
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.55

* obligatoriska frågor

Kursutvärderingssystem från