ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

2010/2011 Cell biology, bioinformatics and systems biology, basic course, UMF012

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-10-07 - 2010-10-31
Antal svar: 6
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Graham Kemp»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

6 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»5 83%
Around 20 hours/week»0 0%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 1.66

- I spent about 12 hours a week, but I would gladly had spent more, but the workload from cell biology part was too high.» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

6 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»0 0%
100%»6 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

6 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 16%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 33%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

- could be more clear the difference between cell biology part goals and bioinformatics and systems biology.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

5 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»5 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

5 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 40%
Yes, definitely»2 40%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- But the system biology part should not have been on the examination as we had no chance of studying the slides (the slides were not handed out) on which these questions were based.» (To some extent)
- Practicals were good. Haven"t had the exam yet.» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 16%
Large extent»4 66%
Great extent»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Lectures were good and informative. » (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»3 50%
Some extent»2 33%
Large extent»1 16%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.66

- It could have been great to have some reference book, hand out or other material about system biology.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

6 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»3 50%
Very well»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- except for system biology, that was very badly handled» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 16%
Very good»2 33%
I did not seek help»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

6 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 16%
Very well»5 83%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

11. How was the course workload?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 16%
Adequate»3 50%
High»1 16%
Too high»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- It was adequate due to the extremly high workload of cell biology. For some students with mixed background, I could be interesting to choose between the practicals or the seminar in the cell biology part and the biocomputing element in the MVE311.» (Adequate)
- Everything at the time..» (High)
- the workload of cell biology was too much» (Too high)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 50%
High»1 16%
Too high»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

6 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 16%
Adequate»3 50%
Good»2 33%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

- the cell biology took too much time, bioinformatics was pushed aside untill the last second» (Fair)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Graham Kemp! Fantastic lectures.»
- The course is very well organized and it was very good to have different professors to each specific topic.»
- bioinformtacis was good»
- The laborations were good, but not always prepared. »
- hand out material was very useful»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- See coment on question 11.»
- the workload of cell biology should be less or the lab reports should be written in groups not individually, and the system biology should given out the lecture slides.»
- Set dates when the reports should be in from the very first beginning!»
- the systems Biology part should IMPROVE»

16. Additional comments

- I would have liked to have some more programming. »
- group work could be good for more participation of the students.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från