|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
TA2 2010, VTA 091Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2010-09-24 - 2010-10-08 Antal svar: 9 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 47% Kontaktperson: Julia Winroth»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2 - no time left due to room acoustic...» (At most 15 hours/week) 2. How large part of the lectures offered did you attend?8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.37 Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus (see http://www.student.chalmers.se/sp/course?course_id=11241 , please change to "English" ) states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. Have the course goals been presented to you in a clear way?8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.62 4. To what extent do you feel you have acquired the knowledge, skills and attitudes stated in the learning outcomes?8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.75 - TA2 helped a lot in learning ways to investigate problems on your own.» (Large extent) 5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.12 6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.62 - Since there was no official examination I´,m not sure. However, I feel I learned alot from the coruse.» (To some extent) Connection between TA1 and TA2An aim with the "Technical Acoustics block" is that TA1 should provide the theoretical basis needed to solve the practical problems in TA2. In this way they are connected and should work as a unity.7. How well do you think this connection worked?8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.12 - BEM and FEM was new for me. A good understanding of the models was not a must for solving practical problems since they were implimented in "black box"-ish sofware. I think that was negative.» (The connection between the courses was not clear) 8. Did you miss anything particular in TA1 with respect to the tasks and demands in TA2?- Nope.»- A better foundation for BEM and FEM in case TA 1 could be larger.» TasksEstimation of all three parts in TA2. Please write extra comments if you have thoughts about the specific parts.9. How do you judge the level of difficulty of the assignments?8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.87 - BEM-lab was way to difficult, complex and therefor needs more experienced counseling (sorry Julia..)» (Adequate) 10. Was the time period scheduled for the assignments sufficient?The time period was...8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 11. How well did the lectures prepare you for the tasks?8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.12 12. To what extend did the lectures help your understanding of the physical concepts investigated in the tasks?8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.25 - The lecture about vibration isolation was too advanced. From my point of view, a lecture about the basis of vibration isolation is needed before getting into the vibration isolation of an engine of a car.» (Some extent) 13. How well were the tasks prepared by the supervisors?8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.25 - Only the BEM-Lab part from what I can remember. All efforts on this task was put to make the Comsol/BEMlab program to work. All this work would probably be better to put on learning the fundamentals of BEM instead.» (There is a need for improvement / please comment) 14. How helpful was the supervision?8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.25 - I have never in my life met such helpful supervisors as the ones in the department of Applied Acousics!» (Very helpful) 15. How did you percieve the correction of the reports?8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.87 - In TA1, there is quite a difference between i.e Jonas and the others when in comes to grading criterions.» (Adequate) Study climate16. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.25 17. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help by the teachers?8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.5 18. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.25 19. How was the course workload?8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.12 - It was very high, however only about half the workload compared to RAC. So it´,s hard to complain.» (High) 20. How was the total workload this study period?8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - RAC should be 15 points, since its easily 22.5 points amount of work.» (High) Summarizing questions21. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The whole idea of having a simulated "real life problem" to solve was the best part of the course.»- I love the way of working and giving the students so much "own work"» - Most of the course» 22. What should definitely be changed to next year?- The BEM task was very messy to say the least. I did not enjoy it, I did not find it very interesting because of the scripts(which I never fully understood)- it felt like working with a black box and the GUI and usability should be easier to handle.»- Availability of more equipment and other help (tooling etc) to build and test various redesign ideas is definitely needed. While the theoretical assessment was great, it would have been nicer to have more time and more resources to try out the redesign ideas which were the main focus of this course. This year not much was made available to implement and use our redesign idea.» - Make RAC1 and RAC2 of the existing RAC-course.» - I would include in the redesign part the real easiest cases we are going to find in real life and then if there is more time get in deeper problems. I would add something that help us to understand how the basic sources work and generate noise (the physic behind the noise and vibration generation of an engine, compressor, etc.).» 23. Additional comments- The lack of combining literature in the courses (TA1 and TA2). I find that the handout-system of course lit. is bad and it makes the whole course seem less professional. Even if you only have it in compendium form, it would be much better.»- I (and at least some others) had problems getting the software to work so I committed a lot of time on that instead of trying to understand the physics and come up with good ideas. Better software and/or more preparation and help would be great.» - In general, a great course»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
25%