Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

NVSF - New venture strategy and formation, CIP035

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2007-12-13 - 2007-12-20
Antal svar: 15
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 45%
Kontaktperson: Anneli Hildenborg»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Klass: Övriga

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

14 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»9 64%
Around 20 hours/week»2 14%
Around 25 hours/week»2 14%
Around 30 hours/week»1 7%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.64

- Hard to say excact since a lot of the project related work has been part of the NVSF even though i havnt really thought about it. » (Around 20 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

15 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 6%
75%»4 26%
100%»10 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.6

- We had some necessary meetings with the projects that made us miss some lectures.» (75%)
- Attended all lectures I could » (75%)
- as much as possible. maybe 90 %» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

15 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»3 20%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»10 66%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 2.93

- They are very broad and could be interpretaded in the way you like. Therefore, it must be hard to set anything but the highest score. The coarse description is in generally terms and not specific.» (The goals are difficult to understand)
- they are sort of unclear but since i guess that they want to give an holistic view and it very much depends on the project work that we do it is harder to pinpoint exakty what to learn since i guess it differs a lot. » (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

14 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»13 92%
No, the goals are set too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.07

- This depends on how you interpretend them... I think that they are so broad that they are too high, be more specific!» (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

14 svarande

No, not at all»2 14%
To some extent»8 57%
Yes, definitely»2 14%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.28

- We ahve not had any exam» (To some extent)
- We had examination on IPR, but in the course pm the course seems to be so much more than that, including everything of starting a venture.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»2 13%
Some extent»8 53%
Large extent»3 20%
Great extent»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

- Some of the Monday seminars have been on a level that might have been too low, basically repeating what we studied last autumn.» (Some extent)
- I learned the most from the teaching the first semester of the program, this year has been more learning of asking other students how the interpret asssignments and so forth. » (Large extent)
- Really good with all the guest lecturers» (Great extent)

Study climate

7. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

15 svarande

Very poor»1 6%
Rather poor»2 13%
Rather good»5 33%
Very good»7 46%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- Jessica did a great job in trying to ask question but since Lars was the course leader and not really easy accessible hence the lead time was rather long from time to time. I feel that it is unfair for the student to have a course leader half the way around the world. » (Rather poor)
- Not with Jessica, but with Lars.» (Rather poor)
- At least when Jessica took over, Lars were more bizzy» (Very good)

8. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

15 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»5 33%
Very well»10 66%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

9. How was the course workload?

15 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 13%
Adequate»9 60%
High»3 20%
Too high»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- Some examination parts where much more effort demanding than the other courses» (High)

10. How was the total workload this study period?

15 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 20%
High»9 60%
Too high»3 20%

Genomsnitt: 4

Summarizing questions

11. What is your general impression of the course?

15 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»5 33%
Adequate»5 33%
Good»5 33%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- The individual parts are ok, but the course as a whole need some work to be really useful for the students.» (Fair)
- Sicne a lot of the course administraiton has worked under the acceptance i want to have in a program like this the impression of the course is lowered. From an examniation point of view there has been a number of assignemtn that has been really good, so that part doesnt need the most approvment. » (Adequate)
- the timeslot of having lectures between 16-1,8 often with out break and not having eaten since lunch, is not the best. It was hard to concentrate and listen. » (Adequate)
- Good be more specific and clear about the goals» (Good)
- Good is the autumn. Poor is the spring.» (Good)

Part II: General Questions

12. How many hours given to the project by the accounting/law firms have you used, and how have they been allocated?

- Accounting: 7-8h. all at one time reagrding a personal issue for future employment. Law firm: 1h. Hasnt really used them. »
- 0 as of today »
- none»
- We have not used law firms for our project.»
- Unfortunately too few, one I think it is. Hopefully we could use them after the year, we have not really been in that big use of them before.»
- Vi har haft lunchmöte med båda våra firmor.»
- Hard to say, 5-10 hours law and 3-5 accounting»
- We will probably use our hours during the first month 2008.»
- We have used a few hours of the law firm on developing our shareholder agreement. We have had a short meeting with the accounitng firm discussing what needs to be done prior to incorporation.»
- None yet, but we have sat up a plan for how to use them. This plan have been comunicated to the accounting/law firm.»
- 0 hours. A shame really.»

13. Do you feel that the cooperation with these firms has benefited your project, and if so, in what way?

- Can only reflect upon the accountant and it has been good. Since the question we asked was mroe from a future perspective its not someting we get value fo today but something that can be of importance fuerther on. »
- to early to say »
- They have been very nice, but we have not been in the position to use their services.»
- I think it is good that we build the relationships, but in our case we need them first next year»
- Inte så mycket än så länge, men jag tror att det kommer att bli mycket fördelaktigt att ha deras hjälp efter årsskiftet.»
- Yes, mostly when it comes to writing contracts»
- Really good, they are so helpful and nice»
- Mostly no but I believe they will do!»
- It has been good to receive some feedback on our shareholder agreement from someone working within the field.»
- To some extent. The cooperations should in the future be more aware of what CSE/GIBBS are doing and hold more relevant (not so general) lectures»
- Yes, it will be»
- Definitely! Even though we did not use them, I see a really big value in the cooperation.»

Part III: Lectures, Exercises and Assignments

14. Göteborgs Juristhus –, Instructions for the CEO and Board

- Good»
- Good but dry subject »
- Pretty boring, but useful»
- Great experience and knowledge sharing.»
- A bit boring, but that was due to the subject and that we were in the incubator»
- Bra föreläsning, tog upp alla grunder. Lite tråkig kanske.»
- Good, valuable info linked to the projects and us as entrepreneurs»
- It was OK.»

15. MAQS –, Basic Contract Law

- Good lecture topic, althoguh i didnt really feelt hat the person having the lectures was really good. There were questions asked by the student that jessica and tomas had to answer instead of MAQS employee. Tjis feels rather poor. »
- Nice introduction should be. More real examples and pitfalls would be good. »
- Good»
- Great experience and knowledge sharing.»
- Quite good, interesting»
- Mycket bra. Bra upplägg.»
- Good, valuable info»
- Good»

16. KPMG –, Close company taxes

- Good, intereesting althoguh rather complex issues.»
- Dry. »
- Good»
- Great experience and knowledge sharing.»
- Really hands on, good»
- Bra föreläsning även om det var lite krångliga grejer.»
- Did not attend»
- Very good»

17. Lindebergs GT–, Finansiell DD & Revision

- good»
- Good»
- Great experience and knowledge sharing.»
- They gave a good impression of the firm and made a good presentation.»
- Helt ok.»
- Did not attend»
- Very good»

18. Setterwalls –, Shareholders Agreement

- Not to good. I guess the subject is good but the lecturer was really poor and the room where we was wasnt to good for lecturing hence i lost my interest rather fast. »
- Good»
- Great experience and knowledge sharing.»
- Not so good, just standing on one place and talk without a PPT or something to help us follow is not right for a boring law-subject like this. We need to see the clauses to be able to follow»
- Denna föreläsning hade varit bättre om de hade använt powerpoint.»
- Good but could be more linked to small companies and start ups»
- Good»

19. Mannheimer Swartling –, The role of the employer

- good»
- Good seminar more examples would be good. »
- Good»
- Great experience and knowledge sharing.»
- Interesting, we have not heard so much about this before so this was really good»
- Lite tråkigt upplägg, men bra grejer som gicks igenom.»
- Did not attend»
- Very good»

20. Price Waterhouse Coopers –, Valuation of the company

- very good. Very interesting topic good lecturers. »
- More of a company pitch than a seminar. »
- Very good»
- Great experience and knowledge sharing.»
- Good have been even better, we more or less learned that in our cases the valuation methods are not applicable but we need to perform them due to the school issue.»
- Detta var en bra föreläsning. Den gav svar på många frågor som jag har haft länge.»
- Did not attend but heard it was really good»
- Could not attend»

21. Delphi –, Motivate and Compensate

- Good topic althoguh the same problem as with MAQS, it didnt really feel that the lecturer knew his subject.»
- Basically a run though of the tax exemptions with differnt compensation programs. »
- Very good»
- Great experience and knowledge sharing.»
- Incentive programs were interesting, I think they did a good presentation»
- Den här föreläsningen var svår att ta till sig. Det känns som att detta är för långt in i framtiden.»
- Did not attend»
- Very good»

22. Vinge –, Legal DD

- Good»
- Very good»
- Great experience and knowledge sharing.»
- They were not good presenters even though they presented their own subject. Legal DD is boring as it is, it does not become better with bad presenters...»
- Jag tycker att detta var en av de bättre föreläsningarna.»
- Did not attend»
- Good»

23. Ernst & Young –, Starting the company –, the practical aspects

- Good topic and good lecture, but it was REALLY annoying that E&Y used liek 20 minutes to discuss their company in order to get new employees. »
- Very good»
- Great experience and knowledge sharing.»
- Really good and especially that we got the handbook as well»
- Väldigt bra föreläsning. Bra att man fick med sig "starta företag" boken.»
- This seminar felt more like a recruitment drive from their side.»
- To basic, not in relation to our situation. Too much focus on EY»
- Very good. I like the binder.»

24. SEB –, Försäkringslösningar

- Really good. I feelt at this was a really good and ubteresting lecture.»
- Good and to the point »
- Very good»
- Interesting and necessary, she made a boring subject interested!»
- Väldigt bra föreläsning, mycket konkret.»
- Very basic yet valuable to some extent»
- Good»

25. Skatteverket –, Skatt

- Really good. This was the msot interesting lecture in the NVSF course the entire fall. »
- Very good»
- They were good and made this interesting, I learned a lot»
- Bra föreläsning. Tog upp allt om grunderna. »
- Very good, but could have had been much more valuable if held in Swedish»
- Very good»

Kursutvärderingssystem från