|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
AMU017 Sustainable Development and Design Professions, MPDSD HT 10»Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2010-09-22 - 2010-10-15 Antal svar: 72 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 55% Kontaktperson: Lotta Särnbratt» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Arkitektur 300 hp
Goals and fullfilment of goalsThe overall purpose of the course is to provide all students, regardless of their subsequent choice of master programme and design studios, with a foundation and an ability to creatively and critically consider and reflect on questions related to the planning, design and management of the built environment within a context of sustainable development. To independently seek knowledge and information from different sources, as well as to reflect upon the implications of the vision of sustainable development in relation to architecture and planning, constitute important parts of the course.The purpose is, moreover - to give an orientation about global challenges concerning environmental degradation, climate change and development issues, - to provide an orientation and an understanding of different perspectives on sustainable development, - to present different approaches to the implementation of the call for sustainable development within the planning, design and management of the built environment at different levels (global,local) and in different settings, - to encourage critical reflection regarding what the notion sustainable development entails for the planning, design and management of the built environment and for professional practices within these fields. 1. How well has the purpose been fulfilled?72 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.22 - the outside trip should be more detailed and specific.» (insufficient) Education and course administration2. How do you evaluate the design of the course (planning and sub-division in time between lectures, literture studies, seminars, films, study visits and course assignment)?72 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.31 - working day lasts too long, even with interesting lectures it"s impossible to pay attention whole day» (rather bad) 3. What support have you got for your learning from lectures?72 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.2 - too varied quality of speakers» (Rather little) 4. What support have you got for your learning from films?72 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.94 - I don"t understand the question.» (No opinion) 5. What support have you got for your learning from study visits?71 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.95 - The Alingsås visit was a let down. I"d rather have the same lectures at Chalmers. We didn"t get much out of the visit.» (Very little) 6. What support have you got for your learning from course literature and other study material?72 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.97 - Much of the literature was about things I was already aware of. The movie clips on the Internet were better.» (Rather little) 7. What support have you got for your learning from the seminars?72 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.01 - The seminars worked well to get the group going but there wasn"t much "new" information coming up in the seminars.» (Rather little) 8. What support have you got for your learning from the course assignment?72 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.09 - 5 min for a presentation is just too little» (Very little) 9. How did the organisation, memoranda, direct information etc. function?72 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.54 - No one knows what is going to happen in a weeks time, and the organisation it quite porly. To many people in the lecture hall, and no breaks, all students start to lose focus after 45 minutes.» (Very bad) Work environment10. How do you rate the possibilities to get assistance and ask questions?72 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.04 - I think so many people are so worry about English language skills that they don"t dare say anything.» (Rather bad) Concluding questions11. What is your overall opinion of the course?71 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.46 - I found this course oriented to just one direction, thah the global warming is existing. But I missed some critical view on it, some rational opinions of opposite wing of scientists. » (Very bad) 12. What should be preserved for next year?- The scheduled time for literature studies and writing, it was great to have that time.»- Everything except of Nr. 13» - I think the course is pretty solid as it is. I"m really happy about the results.» - seminars/discussions » - Lectures, such as the one on slums in Kenya, that took global perspectives into account should be preserved. » - the seminars, some kind of study visit. But better planned. » - Not lectures that aren´,t based on real scientific knowledge. Not lectures that are based on agitation, movements and kind of brainwashing.» - Films, most of the lectures, field trips.» - Films, seminars, lectures from: Ducan Kushnir, Lars Reutersvärd, Pål Castell & Kristel Myttenaere. » - Variety of perspectives from lecturers.» - Seminars and the assignment.» - -» - Lena, Pål and Sigrid!» - seminar part» - Your engagement and concern! It was really a very good course.» - All in general, maybe not the trip to alingsås, even though it was nice, the lecture could as easily have been held at chalmers.» - the remarkable organisation! the assignment - it was neccessary to make some conclusions of your own after the big amount of information during the course.» - organisation, good lectures, end presentations» - filmy» - There was a comment to take away the study visit to Alingsås and the lecture by Merrit Polk. I"m not sure I agree, as I want to create a profile of Urban Planning, I think it"s important to keep the broad approach towards sustainable building. » - the structure is good.» - the visit and films» - Lars Reuterswärd"s lecture. Ancient futures. The seminars. Niklas Wennberg"s lecture. The assignment.» - The end seminars and assignment were surprisingly functional.» - The overall structure with a large variety of different lecturers.» - Good to have lectures from different professions.» - The wide scope from global issues to backyard farming! It"s a good thing to start at the global level to schock the audience and really get the class attention.» - Good films and films in internet specially!» - lot of different presentators, different angles of the problem, broad view» - The basic layout is good. Some said that its a bit to much propaganda. I say that we can sort that out and think for ourselves. » - all!» - The information is rather good, just some details regarding time distribution, for example, more time for seminars.» - Please preserve the variety of lecturers, the most interesting ones always being those who went inte furthest depth in their own field.» - Most lectures, especially Duncan Kushnir was very good. » - the alternance lectures - seminars» - Everything except the study visit. The diversity of lectures.» - Det var väldigt bra med en introduktionsvecka med alla hårda fakta, och sedan mer lösningsförslag eller förhållningssätt. Många bra föreläsare och filmer. » - study visits, seminars» - For my part the seminar work is really important because this is the moment where we can talk and exchange our point of view together.» - Pål Castells lectures, study visit to passive house center.» - Seminars and variety» - movies.....» - seminars, discussions, reading material» - The professors» 13. What should be changed for next year?- There were too many lectures, many about similar things. Also, it would be nice schedule-wise if there wasn"t two or three days 8.30-17.00 in a row, but perhaps more spread out if possible.»- More Seminars Another Room Avoid very long days by splitting up the lectures» - A re-thinking of the study visit to Alingsås to actually make it worth it. Some lectures felt like they didn"t fit in the scope of the course, the lesson about gender equality ended up as being all about driving habits.» - time table» - I think that the variety of opinion should be added on. We had many diverging opinions in the litterature but not in the lectures.» - Less lectures and instead more research by students.» - Lecture room. A-salen isn"t that good. The air becomes bad in about 30 min, and with no pauses and 2 hor lectures its really hard to keep a wake. I haven"t feelt a sleep because of the really uncomfortable shairs which are an other problem. » - Enable students to make their own opinion to the whole problem of global warming. Give lectures that are more based on concrete examples of existing buildings.» - people have to be able to speak english.» - More critical dicussions on films and lectures.» - More seminars/discussions » - The lecture about gender roles in automobile use did not seem relevant to our course purpose.» - I think the films on the last day are very important and final we could talk and share together, which I think it"s good to know openion from friends. It could be compulsory for everyone to see on the last day for this activity.» - 1. Clearer and shorter description and purpose of the presentation material. 2. Integrate some practical work.» - Less lectures, more time for littrature studies.» - more time and objects for study visist otherwise exclude» - Maby less lectures, but more practical lessons...» - the signing part.» - Michael Edens lecture was a disaster. I think it was truly embarrasing. It was almost impossible to follow his thinking trough the slides. (e.g. He just mentioned a lot of shortenings without even an explenation) Another thing was that he talked about passive house as the only solution, was he sponsored? I though. Everyone I have been talking to in the class though that they could not understand a thing, and though it was really unessesary and rude to take up our time with just shallow talk about sustainability. It was not in the same high standard as the rest of the lectures. You must change this!» - Not too many students in A-salen, the ventilation is poorly and the chairs are uncomfertable. As I said before there need do be breaks after 45 minutes, because no matter how interesting the lecture is, you lose focus after a while.» - maybe not so many lectures, some of them seemed a bit out of context. some more time to read the literature instead.» - more or earlier communication between students and staff, other place for lectures?» - zwiekszyc przerwy miedzy wykladami» - In my opinion, there was too many lectures on extreme design but I"m not sure everyone would agree. Maby there could be different tracks formed as lecture packages?» - Be very clear to the lecturers that we already know the situation of the climate krisis from the first days. It is so hard to keep your interest when hearing it for the tenth time. Be more precise about how the posters will be used. maybe cut of some lectures, some days there were just too many.» - there should be enough seats» - Sten Gromark"s lecture did feel a bit misplaced. He didn"t talk so much about the environmentally issues, it was more about cool "green" architecture. Merrit Polk"s lecture was a bit too much. She said things that we all already know and she showed too many diagrams. Her lecture could have been on 15 minutes. I don"t know, maybe it was more useful information for the foreign students but for me as a swedish girl it was too much. The visit at the passive house center in Alingsås we could have skipped. They could have come to us instead because i didn"t get that much out of visiting one apartment that looked like any swedish apartment. » - Length of lectures, invite a climatechange sceptic to improve credibility and uunderstanding of the problem of recognition in the media/bussiness world.» - Not quite so many lectures» - not to many lectures in one day -> can become very boring and just to much!!» - More focus on study visits and practical assignments would have given us tools for applying what we"ve learned.» - The trip to alingsås, and perhaps getting a better coordination between lectures. Many had the same slides and same background story which we had heard many times before. » - Much more seminars where people dare discuss. » - less films, more self-critical presentators, more reflecting posibilities with other students» - One more seminar in between the other two. We really ran out of time in the last seminar. We had to much to discuss.» - a smaller group or a bigger, more confortable room.» - no lectures in the A-sal» - Lecturers could be asked not to reiterate their conviction that there IS a threat to the environment (unless that is their actual subject) this would avoid the repetition of facts that we already know (sometimes from several lectures/films/texts within the course) but focus more on their specific area of expertise, including consequences and solutions, etc.» - Maybe divide the seminars to 4 shorter to discuss the lectures more in detail. Maybe finish up each week with a seminar to sum up.» - to give more answers about sustainable development. From my point of view, the first part was too long, because the second one is more interesting and we learn more from the second part.» - The study visit.» - 1. Det fanns några föreläsningar som inte var i samma klass om de andra, till exempel Michael Edéns "Design for sustainable building". Föreläsningen från Transition Town Alingsås var bra, men hade behövt en diskussion eller en presentation som knöt den mer till oss som arkitekter. Det var väldigt blandade reaktioner på den föreläsningen och det var lite svårt att veta hur man skulle förhålla sig till den. 2. Även om många perspektiv blev presenterade tycker jag att det saknades en kritisk diskussion kring exempelvis passivhus. Det hade varit givande att höra fler sidor av passivhustekniken, så att man lättare kan bilda sig en egen uppfattning.» - -maybe more seminars and less lectures -do the second seminar earlier (as it should be useful for the course assignment) » - More alternance between moovie and lecture because it"s very hard to have during all day lectures» - More discussion/lecture/etc about the different views on sustainable development early in the course. Longer time or dividing the time for the assignment.» - More practical activities» - unn...long days..» - the lecture hall, the chairs in the lecture hall.» - The visits» 14. Other comments- All in all, I think it was a nice course!»- Many thanks to Lena and Sigrid, for everything.» - The course was overall perfect. Very well orgenised and everything went as explained. the only negetaive part was that it was to many lectures in same location. I was getting tired mentaly as well as physicaly. Some lectures were just and only presenting problems in the world. I would like to hear some suggestions for solutions. Otherwise everything was perfect!» - I would just recommend to read some opinions of Bjorn Lomborg, as an one example of many others enviromentalist, that haven´,t a generally accepted view. » - -» - We now know what the problems are, but we didn"t see that much solutions concerning the subject.» - none» - The persons from "transition towns" can talk more about their work on the grasroot level and not tell us about the peak oil, something that we already now by that time in the course. Let them not make fools of them selves when they show us the same picture we already have seen like 5 times in the course.» - brak» - Why cannot architects arrive at time, start at time, finish at time? » - I enjoyed a lot this course. Discussions and debate brought me a lot. Transition towns, from oil dependency to Local resilience, was a very good lecture. Sometimes too general, some subjects pointed out but not developped (New towns in China, generic cities, car dependence... » - If you keep the movie "The Planet" there should be more time for discussion afterwards because one got almost depressed after seeing it.» - I like very much. Thanks everyone!» - Thank you for one of the most informative courses yet!» - » - There is a strong critical view on the consumption paradigm underlying the whole theme of the course. There is also an inherent criticism of the "unquestionable" capitalistic structure of all our societies. These are very interesting subjects, central to the reasoning around long term globally sustainable development. I think we would benefit from making these questions explicit by inviting a lecturer with sustainable economic thoery as their area of expertise. A lecture on the politics of sustainable change would also be most welcome!» - Very well organized course. High level on the lecturers. I was missing a lecture/discussion about how to reach the big segments of clients of sustainable solutions. » - I really appreciate the enthusiasm of the teatchers.» - Det hade varit kul att få en debatt, där inbjudna gäster kan presentera sin hållning och debattera med varandra och klassen. Det hade gett en mer nyanserad och kritisk bild. » - You really should find a better solution than A-salen all day long 5 days a week! Those chairs kill you! And there aren´,t enough for everone....» - The film "Learning from Ladakh" has a extremistic view of the society and ignores all the benefits of modern development. It should not be showed without a critical discussion.» - the course was very good....it is just the beginning a new student in chalmers can ever dream of.» - i thought it was overall a good course. the information was relevant to how we think about sustainability today. I especially appreciated the lectures which were critical of the green movement, and focus more on an actual notion of how things can be sustainable. i appreciate this course for its critical view towards the subject. I would like to see more discussion about that perhaps through workshops or more discussion group seminars.»
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2%