Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Knowledge-based business development and management (GS)

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-06-15 - 2010-06-24
Antal svar: 7
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 46%
Kontaktperson: Anneli Hildenborg»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

7 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»0 0%
Around 25 hours/week»1 14%
Around 30 hours/week»1 14%
At least 35 hours/week»5 71%

Genomsnitt: 4.57

- First 60% was >35h a week. Last 40% was less due to several family issues.» (At least 35 hours/week)
- Why are you assuming we are not doing our 40 hours atleast?» (At least 35 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

7 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»4 57%
100%»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 4.42

- >85%» (75%)
- 95%, dont think they should be compulsary when so many of them was of really low quality and unnecessary for the assignements. » (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

7 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 14%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 14%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 57%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

6 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»5 83%
No, the goals are set too high»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.16

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

7 svarande

No, not at all»2 28%
To some extent»3 42%
Yes, definitely»2 28%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»1 14%
Some extent»4 57%
Large extent»2 28%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.14

- I was amazed we had no help at all with the law assignements, no classes what so ever. Only the "individual questions" with Pamp that seemed more like an examination to me.» (Small extent)
- the assignments not so inline with the teaching» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»1 14%
Some extent»4 57%
Large extent»1 14%
Great extent»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.28

- The literature list was extensive which was good, however many of the articles were hard to implement in the assignments. I would have wanted more help and guiding of finding for example american legal texts and cases. However we were explicitly told that this help is not going to be given to us since this is part of the learning to find out.... or something... » (Small extent)
- The IP-strategy book should have been in the summer reading list!» (Some extent)
- no book, but some of the teaching slides were good. always good to have a RELEVANT book as starting point, and COMPLEMENT with good articles» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

7 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 28%
Rather well»3 42%
Very well»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 3

- late results of the grades.» (Rather badly)
- I think it was really troublesome that the grades got out so late, and didn"t include any feedback (appart from Pamps). I have still not recieved a grade for Sim 5. » (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

7 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»2 28%
Rather good»1 14%
Very good»4 57%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

- The consultation given to the law students were of no help. The consultation was more like a questioning and you did not get any answers of the questions you had, therefore many of the student did therefore not use the "opportunity" to get consultation. » (Rather poor)
- The Question-time with Pamp worked very bad for me. I felt she wanted to make me feel stupid and small rather then help me. » (Rather poor)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

7 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»3 42%
Rather well»3 42%
Very well»0 0%
I did not seek cooperation»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

- It was too much individual work, which resulted in that a lot of student sat at home and worked.» (Rather poorly)
- The class is wonderful, but the assignements didnt really work well for cooperation. More team-work please!» (Rather poorly)
- no group/team work in this module, which I actually missed. » (I did not seek cooperation)

11. How was the course workload?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 85%
High»1 14%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

- Sim 1, 4 and 5 was to large. » (Adequate)
- since the work load has been hard thoughout the semester it was rather nice to have a somewhat more laid back module during the late spring. » (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 85%
High»1 14%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

7 svarande

Poor»2 28%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 28%
Good»2 28%
Excellent»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3

- I"m very disappointed of the course! I think that the overall idea is good but it was very poorly executed. The assignments were to vague and as a student you didn"t have any tools or guiding in accomplishing the tasks in a good way. I also believe that there was a uneven workload between the law student and the engineers/business student and the grading being a lot tougher due to the different teachers grading the assignments. » (Poor)
- It was a messy course with the topics having no connection.» (Poor)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The agricultural case and the lectures from the CIP PS staf held a vey high level. »
- The workload and rather a little increased.»
- The Board day was interesting and well performed by the guest lecture. It gave an alternative view of boards in general and the practical work of a board. The first module with the business models were good, however the graded assignment was to vague . Also the student did not get any tools to work with. »
- The simulations. Greg"s finance. Pat Sullivan.»
- Magnus, the Nemtox case, CIP PS involvement in teaching»
- Pat - he is the man! The Boardroom day, very interesting (exept Boo. The feedback session on Sim 1. The special Lawyer Track - we are expected to know quite different things, so this is good.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The administration plus the professors should work much much closer with students and not be so distant. The students feel sometimes that there is no guidance as far as the material and career guidance as well. It is understandable that professors are busy but this is not an excuse, professors are there (at the school) to guide and to support the students. For this reason I do want to emphasize that the administration and the professors should show much more interest into the student needs. Sometimes students feel without any direction and assistance.»
- For all the graded assignment the student needs more guiding. The consultation provided for the lawstudents was NOT well performed. The person who gives the consultations should be more open and give more help, not criticize the student. The assignment were also too vague which resulted in a lower quality of the work handed in since you felt lost and ambivalent of how to accomplish the task. The lectures held were sometimes extremely below professional standard. There were also an uneven ratio of lectures that were connected to the assignments for the engineers but not for the lawstudents. I think that there should be more group work, since you miss out on a lot of the important discussion and interdisciplinary leverage.»
- A more clear consistent structure. The course was a mash-up of a huge number of different areas that did not always blend in with each-other.»
- Set the finance lectures on a lower level in the beginning (or during the autumn semester), but then teach all we learned for this course which was very interesting. China lectures could have been given less time»
- More groupwork! Find a read thread though the course. Good individual feedback. Lessions for the lawyers.»

16. Additional comments

- Another comment would be directed to the internship committee. The internship committee had shown a lack of organization and had started the process rather late - really, really late. For this reason not so many students were able to get internships through the committee. As you know internships are very vital for students. I would advise the internship committee to plan accordingly and do whatever possible to assist students with internships not only with the internship committee but start to utilize the network of contacts of the professors as well.»
- This was one of the worst courses I have attended during my almost five years at the university! There is a lot of changes that needs to be done and I think that you should revise most of it.»
- Yet another interesting course that I regretfully not could utilize fully the last 40% due to previous mentioned family issues.»
- Thanks for a good course»
- This was the far worse course so far in the ICM program for me. All the boring individual tasks made me almost depressed. I had no will or energy at all to do something good out of it. It needs a read thread and more focus on groupwork.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från