|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Computational Hydrodynamics and Optimisation, MMA160Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2010-06-04 - 2010-08-31 Antal svar: 14 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 77% Kontaktperson: Rickard Bensow» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers Klass: Övriga Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Maskinteknik 300 hp
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.42 - not too much, but also not too little. the work amount was a good balance» (Around 25 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.07 - The lectures were good, but I was lazy. Also traveling all the way to lindholmen takes a while so it"s not something I"m likely to do for a two hour lecture.» (25%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.92 - They where clear and useful during the report task.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.78 - The report and presentation had somewhat vague descriptions. More details about the cruise ship case would have been nice.» (Yes, definitely) Lectures and course administration6. To what extent has the lectures in viscous flow been of help for your learning?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.71 - I had done quite a bit on viscous flow previously» (Some extent) 7. To what extent has the lectures in potential flow been of help for your learning?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.71 - Couldn"t attend any... » (Small extent) 8. To what extent has the lectures in optimisation been of help for your learning?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.92 - same as above.» (Large extent) 9. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.85 - There were equally good literature on the net as the book for the chemical engineers.» (Some extent) 10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.42 - There were many confusions with the schedual. » (Rather badly) Assignments11. To what extent have A1-A2 been of help for your learning?The aim of A1 and A2 was to introduce you to the basic set-up of a viscous flow computation and give you some experience in how choices of boundary conditions, turbulence models and grids affect the results.14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.28 - A1 was excellent! Especially the detailed questions that made you think twice about what was done. A2 had potential, but such a large assignment really needs more detailed instructions. Especially on what you"re expected to show when presenting the results. It was supposed to be 7 rather large simulations which is manageable. But due to unclear instructions we easily performed 50+ simulations and even after all that they were wrong. Apparently we should have used low-Re correction, which wasn"t stated in any instructions. I want clearer instructions and questions like those in A1.» (Large extent) 12. To what extent has A3 been of help for your learning?The aim of A3 was to give some hands-on experience with RANS ship hull computations: set-up, computational cost, and what kind of results and analysis you can extract.14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.64 - It didn"t work as planned. It wasn"t possible to use what was done in the pre assignment in the post assignment. These kind of problems happened all the time with Shipflow and Friendship. All assignments using these applications were a total mess and you didn"t learn half as much as the fluent assignments.» (Small extent) 13. To what extent has A4 been of help for your learning?The aim of A4 was to indicate what type of results you get from potential flow computations and how to design a suitable panel distribution.14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.71 - There were all sorts of problems with Shipflow and Friendship. All assignments using these applications were a total mess and you didn"t learn half as much as the fluent assignments.» (Small extent) 14. To what extent has A5-6 been of help for your learning?The aim of A5-A6 was to introduce you to optimisation and a possible application in ship design.14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.71 - There were all sorts of problems with Shipflow and Friendship. All assignments using these applications were a total mess and you didn"t learn half as much as the fluent assignments.» (Small extent) Examination15. What is your general opinion on the examination form with reports and seminars?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.14 - Good, but clearer instructions would make it very good.» (Good) 16. Was the procedure for examination clear from the course documents?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.28 - Maybe good if the students get the task earlier» (Good) 17. To what extent was the self-assessment helpful when writing the report?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.28 - although it maight be more helpful to teacher than students» (Small extent) 18. To what extent has the peer review been of help for your learning?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.28 - It gave another chance to show what you"ve learnt» (Great extent) 19. To what extent has the seminar been of help for your learning?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.85 - Thx to the seminar, i got a clearer idea on how to improve myself in the future.» (Large extent) Study climate20. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.64 - Very few managed to finish the computer assignments during the time when lab assistants were available. Without lab assistants you can get stuck for hours without progress. For example in A4 some settings were missing from the downloaded files. That"s not something you can really solve by yourself without any prior knowledge about the software. The lab assistants did announce how to solve this during an exercise which helped like the two students who were that far ahead, most of the class missed it. Stuff like this really needs to be published on the web page.» (Rather poor) 21. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.64 22. How was the course workload?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 - If it weren"t for all the hours spent stuck on impossible Shipflow problems the work load would have been rather low.» (Adequate) 23. How was the total workload this study period?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 - It depends on which courses you take. The structural course was a joke, no assignments and an easy exam. The fatigue course however had four rather heavy assignments and a fairly tough exam.» (Adequate) Summarizing questions24. What is your general impression of the course?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.14 - I really liked the viscous part and wish there were more of it. Potential flow was rather confusing and the potential flow assignments were terrible. I wish there were less potential flow in the course. Optimization was very interesting but we barley touched it. I want a few more optimization lectures and assignments not using friendship/shipflow.» (Fair) 25. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The grading criteria and the examination should be preserved.»- A1 as it is. A2 with modifications.» - The way the course is made. Assignments, report and seminar. Very nice way of making a course.» - The report and the seminar!» - assignments were very helpful. so was the seminar.» - The tutorials were really helpful.» - the seminar» - The report was important for the learning. The report task could have been handed out earlier so that you have more time to think it through. » - examination» - Everything except that there should be a deadline for the report before the reviewes. » 26. What should definitely be changed to next year?- For the next year, some part of the lectures can be devoted to the explanation and the expected resulsts of the assignments to be done in the lab. The explanations could be theoritical based and could be related with the assignments so when we are working on the assignments we could now what to expect and be able to comment to a more extent and finally get more out of it.»- A3-6.» - Maybee the report should be written in groups of two and for 10 pages. There are so many areas to cover in the report it is very har to show your knowledge in all fields in only 5 pages.» - More participation and discussino during the lectures.» - One more lecture in potential flow including lift and drag.» - different tutorials» - I think that there should be a mandatory review of all the assignments together with the tutorial teachers, like in A1. To make you sure that you"ve understood everything. » - more time for the report.» - The potential flow compendium. Something more practical.» 27. Additional comments- Thanks for a very interesting and structured course!»- 1. the teacher can encourage students to do some extra reading. 2. suggestion: arrange 2 or 3 student-seminars so fellow students can get more opportunities to exchange some ideas.» - The tutors need to prepare a little better and work as a team. People cannot always attend tutorials and therefore important developments, especially when the tutors did not load the correct files etc, these should be broadcasted to everyone on the homepage» - I really liked this course. It was better and more interesting than my expectations.»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14%