ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

ELDO- Entrepreneurial leadership and dynamic organizing, CIP050

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2007-12-13 - 2007-12-20
Antal svar: 6
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 18%
Kontaktperson: Anneli Hildenborg»
Klass: Övriga

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

6 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»4 66%
Around 20 hours/week»2 33%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.33

- It is very difficult to say how much of the time spent working with the project that was connected to ELDO or any other course.» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

6 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»0 0%
100%»6 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

6 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»2 33%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 33%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 3

- They are described, but could be more exemplified.» (The goals are difficult to understand)
- The learning outcomes are often words that can be interpreted differently. Maybe more concrete would help.» (The goals are difficult to understand)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

5 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»5 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- since I only know what types of goals are set but not how they are graded or what is demanded of me it is hard to know whether they are reasonable.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

5 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 80%
Yes, definitely»1 20%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

- It did not really feel like we had any examination at all, but the lab reports were good in order to reflect upon the situation.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 33%
Large extent»4 66%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- individual and group development talks was very helpful, however the lectures were not as helpful.» (Some extent)
- It has been good but it is always on the field that you learn most.» (Large extent)

Study climate

7. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»6 100%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

8. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

6 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»3 50%
Very well»3 50%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

9. How was the course workload?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 83%
High»0 0%
Too high»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

10. How was the total workload this study period?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
High»5 83%
Too high»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 4.16

Summarizing questions

11. What is your general impression of the course?

6 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 33%
Good»4 66%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- I really appreciate the effort and work that Karen put into the course.» (Adequate)
- Very interesting course and expectations were high. More practical cooaching would be preferred» (Good)

Part II: General Questions

12. What is your overall comment for the course?

6 svarande

very poor»0 0%
poor»0 0%
adequate»0 0%
good»6 100%
very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

13. How well has ELDO integrated with the other courses?

6 svarande

very poor»0 0%
poor»1 16%
adequate»3 50%
good»1 16%
very good»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- I feel like ELDO has been large part of the education in general » (very good)

14. How well has ELDO integrated with the project?

6 svarande

very poor»0 0%
poor»0 0%
adequate»1 16%
good»3 50%
very good»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.16

15. What is your comprehension of Terminologies and theories?

6 svarande

very poor»0 0%
poor»1 16%
adequate»3 50%
good»2 33%
very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

- Not expressed very explicitely but on the other hand, the main points were taken and usable to some extent» (adequate)

16. What is your comprehension of Meetings?

6 svarande

very poor»0 0%
poor»0 0%
adequate»1 16%
good»1 16%
very good»4 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

17. What is your comprehension of Group dynamics?

6 svarande

very poor»0 0%
poor»0 0%
adequate»1 16%
good»2 33%
very good»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

18. What is your comprehension of Negotiations?

6 svarande

very poor»0 0%
poor»1 16%
adequate»3 50%
good»1 16%
very good»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- The Germans seemed to have a lot more information but at the same time they messed up the time schedule and it made it a bit messy» (poor)

19. What is your comprehension of Coaching?

6 svarande

very poor»0 0%
poor»0 0%
adequate»1 16%
good»4 66%
very good»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 4

20. What is your comprehension of Recruitment?

6 svarande

very poor»0 0%
poor»1 16%
adequate»4 66%
good»1 16%
very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- More time should be spent teaching the students about the importance of gather a good board of directors.» (poor)

21. What is your comprehension of Reflection and Entrepreneurial Identity?

6 svarande

very poor»0 0%
poor»0 0%
adequate»1 16%
good»3 50%
very good»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.16

22. Please list three things you most appreciated about the course and three things you least appreciated or felt were missing from the course.

- The group development talks were the best part of the course where we got to reflect over things that doesn"t naturally come up in the group. Some of the entrepreneurs were really interesting and motivating. It was also good to have the labreport every second week instead of every week. Some of the entrepreneurs were not that interesting and it felt like I had heard most of it before. »
- +group talks +individual talks »
- Appreciated most: the individual development talks, Flemmings lectures, group development talks. Appreciated least: journal, negotiation with Germany (since the timing was bad and there were no clear structure in advance of what we were supposed to do), too many inside the entrepreneur »
- Appreciated: Karens effort, negotiations, inside the entrepreneurs Least appreciated: The journals.»

Part III: Lectures, Exercises and Assignments

23. Individual Development Talks (Pia/Sanne):

6 svarande

very poor»0 0%
poor»0 0%
adequate»0 0%
good»0 0%
very good»6 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

- The best bart from which I gained very much. Very good advices and reflections that was very good in the personal development. Increase the number of talks!» (very good)
- I talked to Pia.» (very good)

24. Leadership: Inquiry/Advocacy (Flemming):

6 svarande

very poor»0 0%
poor»1 16%
adequate»0 0%
good»2 33%
very good»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.16

- Very interesting, would liked even more lectures with him.» (very good)

25. PR2 Feedback and Presentation skills (Maria W.):

5 svarande

very poor»0 0%
poor»0 0%
adequate»2 40%
good»2 40%
very good»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

26. Group Development Talk 3 (KW):

6 svarande

very poor»0 0%
poor»0 0%
adequate»0 0%
good»2 33%
very good»4 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.66

27. Entrepreneurial Identity (Gene Fitzgerald –, MIT):

5 svarande

very poor»0 0%
poor»0 0%
adequate»1 20%
good»4 80%
very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

28. Organizational Quality/Level 5 Leaders (Tobias B.):

6 svarande

very poor»0 0%
poor»1 16%
adequate»1 16%
good»1 16%
very good»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 4

29. Negotiations (KW/with Germans):

6 svarande

very poor»0 0%
poor»1 16%
adequate»4 66%
good»1 16%
very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- would be good with more instructions about the exercise and information about the companies, » (poor)
- More detailed instructions would be good» (adequate)

30. Group Development Talk 4 (KW):

6 svarande

very poor»0 0%
poor»0 0%
adequate»0 0%
good»2 33%
very good»4 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.66

- All the group development talks were very much apprechiated» (very good)

31. Comments on integration with Business Design ’,09 around projects:

- Interesting and the first time I really felt how much I have developed since last fall»
- good to learn from them»
- They have been very engaged and they got new interesting perspectives on the case. »

32. Comments on Inside the Entrepreneurial Studio:

- should be more about helping us, not just telling us what it could be like»

33. What course literature would you like included in the course?

- Some more litterature, maybe a book or something related to the topic»
- literature about leadership and group dynamics»
- More on leadership and teambuilding»

34. Other comments:

Kursutvärderingssystem från