ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Edited version: Language-based security, Lp4 VT-10, TDA601 / DIT101

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-05-31 - 2010-10-25
Antal svar: 14
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 27%
Kontaktperson: Victoria Ewers»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?*

14 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»5 35%
Around 20 hours/week»5 35%
Around 25 hours/week»3 21%
Around 30 hours/week»1 7%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?*

14 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»3 21%
50%»2 14%
75%»6 42%
100%»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 3.64 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.82

Goals and goal fulfilment

3. How understandable are the course goals?

14 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 7%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 28%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»9 64%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

13 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»13 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

14 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»5 35%
Yes, definitely»5 35%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»3 21%

- I assume that the word "examination" means labs and project work.» (Yes, definitely)
- Since the grade is based on the project, it is quite hard to do some self-evaluation.» (Yes, definitely)
- I think this course is good as it is with a project. But if something should be added it could be some questions for lab3 where you show that you have understood the contents of the course so far.» (To some extent)

Course specific questions

6. Would you prefer to spread the lab deadlines more evenly over the course or concentrate them in the beginning to leave time for project work at the end?*

Frågan är kopplad till lärare: Andrei Sabelfeld»

14 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

spread more evenly over the course»5 35%
concentrate them in the beginning»8 57%
Not sure»1 7%

- It"s better to concentrate lab deadlines in the beginning, because this would help to avoid the final push in the end of the course, when the project deadline is looming too.» (concentrate them in the beginning)
- Initial deadlines should be concentrated to the beginning, final deadlines to the end of the course.» (concentrate them in the beginning)
- Concentrate them and move the deadline for the project proposal to a later date. This way the students have time to get introduced to more different topics of the course and it will thus be easier to choose an interesting subject for the project.» (concentrate them in the beginning)

7. Do you think more details and explanations can be included in the lectures? If yes, please specify topics.*

14 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

Yes»1 7%
No»4 28%
Not sure»10 71%

- I would prefer to have a more detailed discussion of buffer overflows and related tools. For example, a demo of stack inspection with gdb could be nice.» (Yes, Not sure)
- I think the level of details in the lectures are good. If one want more details it is always possible to look them up.» (No)
- It is probably better to keep the details in the literature.» (Not sure)

8. Please, list additional topics that can be covered in the course, if any.

Teaching and course administration

9. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
To some extent»3 21%
Large extent»8 57%
Great extent»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 3

- If only I attended more lectures...» (To some extent)
- Lectures were good, lab supervision was great.» (Great extent)
- Good tempo, flawless English, good explanations. Good job Andrei.» (Great extent)

10. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»1 7%
Some extent»3 21%
Large extent»7 50%
Great extent»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

- Lecture notes and linked material was good.» (Some extent)
- Google is my friend.» (Great extent)

11. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

14 svarande

Very badly»1 7%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»7 50%
Very well»6 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

- Guidance in one of the lab was poor and several days time unnecessarily wasted.» (Very badly)

Study climate

12. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

14 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»4 28%
Very good»10 71%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

13. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

14 svarande

Very poorly»1 7%
Rather poorly»1 7%
Rather well»6 42%
Very well»6 42%
I did not seek coopeation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.21

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

14 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»7 50%
Excellent»7 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

- Very nice course.» (Excellent)

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Labs»
- Quality of lab assistants. »
- The labs cover essential topics in the subject.»
- Keep Andrei.»
- The labs and the project»
- The absence of exam.»
- Labs, Project, Presentations.»
- The assignments were very useful and covered various aspects of the course.»

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- This is more of a suggestion than something that "definitely" should be changed. Have more lectures during the first weeks where all the content of the course is covered in a more shallow way, and then go in depth during later lectures. The reason for this would be to introduce the students to more of the topics in language-based security before the project proposal is made. I found myself wanting to do a different project some weeks after the proposal had been made.»
- The labs are a bit easy. They can be more tricky. »
- Maybe there should be more presentations.»
- The lecture by F was terrible. It has nothing with the topic of LBS to do what so ever, and he went over time by 10 minutes. If I wanted a lecture on study technique I could seek one by myself.» (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)

17. Additional comments

- Great course!»

Additional comments

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.82
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.45

* obligatoriska frågor

Kursutvärderingssystem från