Visa resultat

Functional Materials 2009, TIF115

General about the course

1. What would be the best time for this course

- ligger ganska bra som den gör»

1st semester
6 svarande

1st quarter»		1		16%
2nd quarter»		1		16%
3rd quarter»		1		16%
4th quarter»		3		50%

Genomsnitt: 3

2nd semester
5 svarande

1st quarter»		0		0%
2nd quarter»		0		0%
3rd quarter»		1		20%
4th quarter»		4		80%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

Your own effort

2. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

10 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»		2		20%
Around 20 hours/week»		5		50%
Around 25 hours/week»		3		30%
Around 30 hours/week»		0		0%
At least 35 hours/week»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.1

- lp4 innebär ofta en skev arbetsfördelning då väldigt lite händer fram till påsklovet och i stort sett allt efter.» (Around 25 hours/week)

3. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

10 svarande

0%»		0		0%
25%»		1		10%
50%»		1		10%
75%»		5		50%
100%»		3		30%

Genomsnitt: 4

Goals and goal fulfilment

4. How understandable are the course goals?

I have not seen/read the goals»		5		50%
The goals are difficult to understand»		0		0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»		3		30%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»		2		20%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

6 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»		0		0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»		5		83%
No, the goals are set too high»		1		16%

Genomsnitt: 2.16

Teaching and course administration

6. How do you rate Janusz" lectures?

Not good at all»		0		0%
Not so good»		1		11%
Neither good or bad»		4		44%
Good»		4		44%
Very good»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- helt ok, men inte direkt inspirerande» (Neither good or bad)
- Interesting but sometimes hard to follow. but that is probably more because of my own lack of focus. » (Good)

7. How do you rate August"s lectures?

Not good at all»		0		0%
Not so good»		1		11%
Neither good or bad»		2		22%
Good»		5		55%
Very good»		1		11%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- se ovan» (Neither good or bad)
- very good but it would be good with more text on the slides so it is easier to follow a missed lesson.» (Very good)

8. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		1		10%
Some extent»		4		40%
Large extent»		4		40%
Great extent»		1		10%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

9. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		0		0%
Some extent»		2		20%
Large extent»		6		60%
Great extent»		2		20%

Genomsnitt: 3

- the slides taught me a lot. i didn"t buy the book because it was so expensive.» (Large extent)
- slides» (Large extent)
- boken (Hummel) verkar tyvärr inte täcka hela kursen» (Large extent)

10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

Very badly»		0		0%
Rather badly»		1		10%
Rather well»		8		80%
Very well»		1		10%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Communication can be improved - more information about projects/presentations on web page. Quality of handouts was very inhomogeneous. Some formulars were unreadable/destroyed probably during file format conversion.» (Rather badly)
- The slides for the presentations were sometimes (i.e. 2/3 out of 13 lectures) not put on the course webpage before the corresponding lecture.» (Rather well)

Examination

11. How well did the written exam cover the course?

Not at all»		0		0%
Marginally»		0		0%
Reasonably»		8		80%
Very well»		2		20%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

12. How demanding was the course project?

Not demanding at all»		0		0%
Rather demanding»		10		100%
Too demanding»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- fun!» (Rather demanding)

13. Your opinion about project presentations.

Oral presentations would be preferred»		0		0%
A combination of oral/poster presentations would be better»		2		20%
The poster presentations worked well»		8		80%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- i learned so much of the other students posters. much better than boring presentations. it was fun.» (The poster presentations worked well)
- My first poster presentation. Would be alot more fun to create more proffessional posters with a template or something like that. Posters are a very good and concise way of presentating and is used everywhere but at chalmers not often all.» (The poster presentations worked well)
- skulle vara önskvärt med mer genomgång av hur man gör en bra poster, exempel på posters etc. nu famlade man mest i mörker.» (The poster presentations worked well)

Study climate

14. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

Very poor»		0		0%
Rather poor»		0		0%
Rather good»		5		50%
Very good»		4		40%
I did not seek help»		1		10%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

15. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

Very poorly»		1		10%
Rather poorly»		1		10%
Rather well»		2		20%
Very well»		5		50%
I did not seek cooperation»		1		10%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

16. How was the course workload?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		1		10%
Adequate»		8		80%
High»		1		10%
Too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3

17. How was the total workload this study period?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		1		10%
Adequate»		6		60%
High»		3		30%
Too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- 3 courses... my own choice» (High)

Summarizing questions

18. What is your general impression of the course?

Poor»		0		0%
Fair»		1		10%
Adequate»		4		40%
Good»		4		40%
Excellent»		1		10%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- It was quite difficult but I have learnt interesting things.» (Adequate)
- The course content could be a bit less broad and a bit more deep. But not much. Now it feels like most of the stuff I have learned are short facts about different materials. Maybe you could include more about the process of actually designing and manufacturing new materials, the philosophy behind it so to say. But mostly it"s a good layout in the course.» (Adequate)
- very fun!» (Excellent)

19. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

20. What should definitely be changed to next year?

21. Additional comments