Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Computer aided industrial design (2010), PPU010

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-05-28 - 2010-06-10
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 55%
Kontaktperson: Oskar Rexfelt»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 27%
Around 20 hours/week»3 27%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»3 27%
At least 35 hours/week»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.81

- I think it was too much for a basic level» (Around 30 hours/week)
- New software for me then a lot of work on it.» (At least 35 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»5 45%
100%»6 54%

Genomsnitt: 4.54

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

11 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 18%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 18%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»7 63%

Genomsnitt: 3.27

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»7 77%
No, the goals are set too high»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 2.22

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

11 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 27%
Yes, definitely»6 54%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»1 9%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»3 27%
Great extent»7 63%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

- It was too fast teaching, little practicing in the class with the teacher and therefor many unanswered questions that keep some students backward.» (Small extent)
- The structure of the teachings were great. They way we go through how things work together, and then trying it out ourselves directly after. Feels like a good way to learn» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»1 9%
Some extent»1 9%
Large extent»6 54%
Great extent»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3

- The guides were good, but some of them were outdated and the tools they used weren"t in the program anymore. It wasn"t really a problem though since you could find a workaround by just trying things out, and thats also a good way to learn.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

10 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»4 40%
Very well»6 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 9%
Rather good»2 18%
Very good»8 72%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 9%
Rather well»4 36%
Very well»3 27%
I did not seek cooperation»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.72

11. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 9%
Adequate»6 54%
High»2 18%
Too high»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

- Additional assignments should be handed out to be able to get higher grades» (Low)
- it took almost all my study time so I was not able to work on other courses well» (Too high)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 27%
High»7 63%
Too high»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

- If this course was not take too much time and practice, then it would be adequate workload » (High)
- Had the product development project at the same time, which is what you make of it. Since the CAID didn"t take up a lot of time I spend a lot on the project instead.» (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 9%
Adequate»1 9%
Good»7 63%
Excellent»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- Got to know the basics of the program, but would have liked to spend some more time with it» (Adequate)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- To see two different softwares was really good...»
- project to hand-in»
- The structure of the lectures/practicing. Except maybe the lectures got a little long some times»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- ...but not enough time to use CATIA deeply, and see how to connect Alias and Catia.»
- the final test»
- maybe try to learn more on Catia but I know that we had no time and the organization for this lecture was by consequences very good.»
- Add some extra assignments for those who are finished with the basic ones quickly, in order to be able to set higher grades.»

16. Additional comments

- many computer modeling programmes can be more useful , common, and easier to work with. it was better to focus on just one programme and spend more time to work and practice in the class time. I mean I think the teacher should wait for everyone to learn step by step as it was the basic course and help more to not face a lot of problem and also learn to solve problems. »
- Thank you.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från