Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Advanced form design 2 (2010), PPU101

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-05-28 - 2010-06-10
Antal svar: 12
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 48%
Kontaktperson: Oskar Rexfelt»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

12 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 8%
Around 20 hours/week»7 58%
Around 25 hours/week»3 25%
Around 30 hours/week»1 8%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

12 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»0 0%
100%»12 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

12 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»4 33%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»7 58%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- I can understand them now, when the course is finished.» (The goals are difficult to understand)
- The goal could have been more clear from the beginning!» (The goals are difficult to understand)
- would like to better understand what was expected of us. Its first time of this kind of approach so maybe clearer goals if possible. » (The goals are difficult to understand)
- You need to have done the course to be able to understand the course description.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

12 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 8%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»10 83%
No, the goals are set too high»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Do not change the course PM in the middle thanks! Or do it more clearly, send out a mail or something.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

11 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 18%
Yes, definitely»6 54%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent»2 16%
Some extent»8 66%
Large extent»2 16%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Didn"t have any» (Some extent)
- Its not really a course where you learn from teacing. You rather learn from doing. The teachers guided us a lot with our work, i.e. our "going".» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent»5 41%
Some extent»5 41%
Large extent»2 16%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.75

- Didn"t have any» (Small extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

12 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»9 75%
Very well»3 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- The second part of the Avanced Form worked much better then the first one.» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

12 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»3 25%
Very good»9 75%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- The weekly meetings worked very well.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

12 svarande

Very poorly»1 8%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»4 33%
Very well»7 58%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.41

- When people constantly is coming 15-25min late for every meeting you start to get tired! And when they do come, they do not give any response at all, it was like to talk to a brick wall sometimes! Every damn single questions went like this: 1. Ask, 2. Wait 10min, 3. Get a I don"t know OR wait 30min more, 4. Asked if they have heard me, and then they answered that they had... it was totally crazy sometimes! Then one of the members said that doing nothing makes you creative... yeah, but not the whole project! Will NOT work with these people again! I had the idea to contact the teacher in the beginning but I felt that it may damage the group. And I wanted to give them some more time to adjust... but now I regret that I didn"t approach the teacher, would have been easier to work alone... Not to do the rotations.. but one of the members didn"t the work of each of the rotations so it was kind of hard to get anything out of that persons work at all.» (Very poorly)
- It was better to set international group to improve the team work» (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

12 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»9 75%
High»3 25%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- Very stressful at the end with the reflective report.» (Adequate)
- Even if the goal wasn"t that clear the workload was totally ok, it was the group problem that was the load...» (Adequate)
- The IDO took to much time, to bad because this is a interesting course and project. Could use some re-planning with more time for part 2 as the last weaks were espessially timeconsuming in IDE-project.» (Adequate)
- Bit to low in the beginning and it was hard to rearrange the scheduled checkpoints in order to work more in the beginning. The workload got wery high in the last few weeks due to that.» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

12 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 25%
High»7 58%
Too high»2 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.91

- The IDE project took alot of energy, but I would not have wanted to work any less on that project so hard to do anything about that.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

12 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 8%
Adequate»1 8%
Good»10 83%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- Good approach to the design process! More aid to the students how to do would be good though.» (Adequate)
- very learning and important approach to try and reflect upon in this education, should have some trial, learning session in some other course before this one. » (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The every-week supervisions. »
- The approach, the rotations»
- The basic idea with the course. To develop form with a theme as guidance.»
- The process and the principle of going from abstact to product.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- A bit more theory in this course and more practical work in AFD1»
- not changing the pm in the middle of the course»
- Integrating AFD1 and AFD2 better.»
- The tasks in the course could be explained a little bit better. hat the course is quite abstract in the begining. A clearer timeplan should be available or suggested.»

16. Additional comments

- Ulrike and Björn did a great job, thank you!»
- Mix people together with a personality test, since this course mainly is about to understand a new way of design. Working with people is something that you do in every other course... :)»

Kursutvärderingssystem från