Visa resultat

Project IDE 2010, PPU095

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

20 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»		1		5%
Around 20 hours/week»		5		25%
Around 25 hours/week»		3		15%
Around 30 hours/week»		9		45%
At least 35 hours/week»		2		10%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

- Quite much the same workload the whole semester. (positive)» (Around 20 hours/week)
- Probably around 20 during the first part and around 40 the last few months.» (Around 30 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

20 svarande

0%»		0		0%
25%»		0		0%
50%»		0		0%
75%»		1		5%
100%»		19		95%

Genomsnitt: 4.95

- Appreciated the effort that Örjan took to give everybody the opportunity to attend to the IPR lectures.» (100%)
- There was almost no teaching, though.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

3. How understandable are the course goals?

I have not seen/read the goals»		6		30%
The goals are difficult to understand»		0		0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»		5		25%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»		9		45%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

17 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»		1		5%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»		16		94%
No, the goals are set too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.94

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

No, not at all»		0		0%
To some extent»		7		41%
Yes, definitely»		7		41%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»		3		17%

Genomsnitt: 2.76

- I think it is difficult for the examinator to see what we have done. The examinator has almost no insight in the process. Only the results presented at the two presentations and the brief report.» (To some extent)
- I did the Textibel project which was very different to the other projects. The others probably forfilled the goals better.» (To some extent)
- 4 pages of report, half an hour of presentation and lots of people in the group. Who knows how far I got personally?» (To some extent)
- The limitation in report size was both good and bad. It allowed us to focus on the project but also limited our ability to communicate the project details in written from. Maybe a recording of the presentation for next time could complement the written report.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		9		45%
Some extent»		10		50%
Large extent»		0		0%
Great extent»		1		5%

Genomsnitt: 1.65

- working very individually (the group) in the textibel project.» (Small extent)
- There has not been much teaching going on.» (Small extent)
- Almost no teaching, so what do you expect?» (Small extent)
- I would like more tutor time, from first week. Every week or every other week would be sufficient. » (Some extent)
- No teaching was conducted but you used much of the earlier teachings from the program during the course. » (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		9		47%
Some extent»		9		47%
Large extent»		1		5%
Great extent»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.57

- Did not have any recomended litterature. We got some tips from our coach and the company.» (?)
- obligatorisk propaganda litteratur framställer omdiskuterade politiska värderingar som självklara religiösa sanningar, hör absolut inte hemma på högskolenivå » (Small extent)
- There was not much course literature.» (Small extent)
- No course literature.» (Small extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

Very badly»		0		0%
Rather badly»		4		20%
Rather well»		14		70%
Very well»		2		10%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- The IDE project course had a good administration, the textibel course on the other hand had a very very poor administration.» (Rather badly)
- We had an ftp server available that let us reach school data from home, but only learned of it a week before examination, and not from course staff. Terrible. Terrible.» (Rather badly)
- The information that the shared hard drive was accessible from the internet could have been a bit clearer.» (Rather well)
- Good with e-mail reminding of updates on the course webpage.» (Very well)

9. A part of this course was about "Intellectual Property Rights". How do you judge the importance of this part?

Unimportant»		3		15%
Of Little Importance»		7		35%
Moderately Important»		4		20%
Important»		5		25%
Very Important»		1		5%
No opinion»		0

Genomsnitt: 2.7

- Det var väldigt grundläggande information som upplevdes vara på en alldeles för låg nivå i förhållande till övriga kursen» (Unimportant)
- propaganda med närvarokrav, hör inte hemma i högskole nivå, speciellt inte det obligatoriska informationsbladet från intresseorganisationen själv. har inte ändrat mina åsikter om hur fruktansvärt felaktigt system vi följer. Föreläsaren gjorde dock sitt bästa för att framstå öppen för diskussion.» (Unimportant)
- Furthermore, this information was not new to us.» (Of Little Importance)
- To much svammel, repetition och totalt ointressanta detaljer. Hade räckt med två föreläsningar.» (Moderately Important)
- I would like to have more discussions in the class. The upcoming discussions where the most interesting part. More time to ask questions related to our ongoing projects and future projects.» (Important)
- Some elements about the practical workflow in searching finance while not disclosing the content of your project could be good. Practical tips from the entrepreneurship master perhaps.» (Very Important)

10. How was the part of the course that considered Intellectual Property Rights carried out?

Extremely Poor»		1		5%
Below Average»		4		21%
Average»		14		73%
Above Average»		0		0%
Excellent»		0		0%
No opinion»		1

Genomsnitt: 2.68

- Examinationen kändes tämligen lösryckt och upplevdes inte koppla jätteväl mot övriga projektet. Detta kan visserligen bero på att IPR delen blev förskjuten i planeringen.» (Below Average)
- The lectures were quite slow and booring. Reading on your own would have used the time better. The possibility to ask questions will on the other hand disapear then.» (Below Average)
- för subjektiv» (Below Average)
- It"s not that interesting. Also I lacked the discussion. The last lecturer was better in engaging the class in a good way.» (Average)

Study climate

11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

Very poor»		1		5%
Rather poor»		0		0%
Rather good»		10		50%
Very good»		9		45%
I did not seek help»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

- Very little tuition and supervision.» (Very poor)
- It"s always an email away, but for the data management we approached Ralf at the outset and he didnt get back to us.» (Rather good)

12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

Very poorly»		0		0%
Rather poorly»		3		15%
Rather well»		4		20%
Very well»		13		65%
I did not seek cooperation»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Very well with students from Chalmers.» (Rather poorly)
- It was really hard, working with HDK and Borås Textile School students with different background, and mainly differen culture (all foreigners) but in the end I am glad I did it. I learned a lot and it turned out well.» (Rather poorly)
- big group with higly different ambitions led to one part that worked a lot, decided a lot, and totally neglected the other parts desitions and opinions. Very harsh work environment but good learning. » (Rather poorly)
- No hard feelings, but not really progressing fast and dynamically either. » (Rather well)
- It was hard to plan shared working hours because very few in our group shared courses apart from the IDE project. PErhaps there should be an appointed project leader next time that has a main focus of project administration rather than the product development focus.» (Rather well)
- Not very well with the foreign students in our group, as they do not understand english very well,neither can they write or speak it very well.» (Rather well)

13. How was the course workload?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		0		0%
Adequate»		12		60%
High»		7		35%
Too high»		1		5%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

- I feel like it was up to the group and up to each individual student to set up goals and ambitions.» (Adequate)
- In the beginning too low, in the end quite high.» (Adequate)
- Up to the group.» (Adequate)
- It is what you make of it, but we like good results so it"s worth it.» (High)
- We put up the plan and the workload was basically determined by ourselves.» (High)
- the group dynamics demanded everyone to work equally with the most (insanly) ambitious. » (Too high)

14. How was the total workload this study period?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		0		0%
Adequate»		9		45%
High»		10		50%
Too high»		1		5%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- IDE took alot of time from other courses.» (High)

Summarizing questions

15. What is your general impression of the course?

Poor»		0		0%
Fair»		0		0%
Adequate»		3		15%
Good»		9		45%
Excellent»		8		40%

Genomsnitt: 4.25

- Company contact is great, and that is always good. But what is new compared to the bachelor? Not much. Some new views on project management or leadership or tracks of specialization within the course would be great. Data management, goal setting and communication skills was lacking in our group. Group sizes.. we were way too many. Encourage arranging own projects if you have problems getting companies.» (Adequate)
- The best thing is the collaboration with a company. » (Good)
- A useful, fun course. But a lot can be improved in terms of administration in the textibel coure. A common view of the course is neccesary for all participants which was not the case this year. When it comes to the IDE project course I have no complaints.» (Good)
- Very good projects to choose from, but too little involvement from teachers and supervisors.» (Good)
- It is truly great to be able to do projects with companies. It offers valuable experience in so many ways!» (Excellent)

16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

17. What should definitely be changed to next year?

18. Additional comments