ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Energy systems modelling and planning, MEN115, TMASA, v10, MEN115

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-05-27 - 2010-06-02
Antal svar: 14
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 25%
Kontaktperson: Valborg Ekman»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

14 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»6 42%
Around 20 hours/week»4 28%
Around 25 hours/week»4 28%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.85

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

14 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 7%
75%»8 57%
100%»5 35%

Genomsnitt: 4.28

- due to colliding lectures with an other course. » (75%)
- Not so much teaching in this course. The lectures are bad and not conected to the exam. Some of the project teachers was quite good.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

14 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 21%
The goals are difficult to understand»2 14%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 42%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 2.64

- If I understand Ahlgren corect this is an "open course" so everything can happen...» (The goals are difficult to understand)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

12 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 8%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»11 91%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.91

- As I understand the gool they are reasonable according to our background. But they are still hard to understand...» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

14 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»6 42%
Yes, definitely»4 28%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»4 28%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

- Some questions were never treated in class (biogas calculations). The examination did not include theoretical parts on models.» (To some extent)
- The exam don"t have the same focus as the rest of the corse» (To some extent)
- LP task was good» (To some extent)
- I don´,t know. The exam have nothing to do with the lectures, don´,t need any lectures next year. But test some parts from the projects.» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»1 7%
Some extent»8 57%
Large extent»3 21%
Great extent»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

- In the project but nothing from the lectures.» (Some extent)

7. How do you assess the quality of the lectures by Erik Ahlgren

14 svarande

Very badly»1 7%
Rather badly»6 42%
Rather well»5 35%
Very well»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

- Nothing to do with the other part of the course. Hard to see that conection. Ha can never fill the whole time and not have any line in his lectures» (Very badly)

8. How do you assess the quality of the lectures by Martin Börjesson

14 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 7%
Rather well»9 64%
Very well»4 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.21

- I wants to do a good job and thats good. He is also quite help full.» (Rather well)

9. How do you assess the quality of the lectures by Niklas Vahlne

13 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»4 30%
Rather well»7 53%
Very well»2 15%

Genomsnitt: 2.84

- Wasent intresting and have quite bad knowledge in the used program.» (Rather badly)

10. How do you assess the quality of the lectures by John Johnsson

13 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 7%
Rather well»11 84%
Very well»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Profesional and good. More of that kind of lectures in the future.» (Rather well)

11. How do you assess the quality of the lectures by German Maldonado

5 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 20%
Rather well»4 80%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- did not attend this one» (?)
- Interesting person but he should have done it in just 45 minutes instead of 2h without break, and skip the powerpoint next time.» (Rather badly)

12. To what extent has the assignments been of help for your learning Assignment 1 (debate on district heating)

14 svarande

Small extent»1 7%
Some extent»4 28%
Large extent»8 57%
Great extent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.64

- Not really clear explanations.» (Small extent)
- If he ask on that articles I have learn a lot about them» (Large extent)

13. To what extent has the assignments been of help for your learning Assignment 2 (load curves and reference energy systems)

14 svarande

Small extent»1 7%
Some extent»4 28%
Large extent»6 42%
Great extent»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 2.78

- Interesting assignments but some part are unclear e.g. the calculations of avoided costs in part B.» (Large extent)
- Nothing on the exam about RES» (Large extent)

14. To what extent has the assignments been of help for your learning Assignment 3 (biogas)

14 svarande

Small extent»1 7%
Some extent»8 57%
Large extent»4 28%
Great extent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.35

- To genreal it is hard to know what to cover and learn.» (Small extent)
- Actually, goals for assignment were not much understandable for me.» (Some extent)
- The feedbacks are not enough. A summary to the minimum requirements should be given at the end (e.g. examples of calculations of CER...)» (Some extent)
- The assignment is to messy. needs better guidelines» (Some extent)
- And they are a little love in biogas so its important for teh exam.» (Large extent)

15. To what extent has the assignments been of help for your learning Assignment 4 (MARTES)

14 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 14%
Large extent»8 57%
Great extent»4 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

- Good to know about the program but not so much for the exam» (Large extent)

16. To what extent has the assignments been of help for your learning Assignment 5 (LEAP)

14 svarande

Small extent»1 7%
Some extent»4 28%
Large extent»8 57%
Great extent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.64

- This assignment was to genral, it was really hard to know if there were any relevanced ouputs» (Some extent)
- Dont learn what I need for the exam about Vietnam.» (Some extent)
- Good program, bad assignment» (Some extent)

17. To what extent has the assignments been of help for your learning Assignment 6 (LP)

14 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 7%
Large extent»8 57%
Great extent»5 35%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

- Did not know about the solve function in excel before but that was about everythin I learned from the assignment besides the shadow price as well» (Some extent)
- Good project, good lecture and a good exam question. One of the few good piont in this course!!» (Large extent)
- It would be fun to do this assignment on the same system as assignment4 and compare the results.» (Great extent)

18. How do you asses the supervision by John Johnsson (assignment 4)

14 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»10 71%
Very well»4 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

- He know the program and give us good hints. But I think is a good idea that the correcting teacher also is there on Johnssons exercise.» (Rather well)

19. How do you asses the supervision by Niklas Vahne (assignment 5)

14 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»4 28%
Rather well»7 50%
Very well»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 2.92

- He have no idea about the program and always passive to problems.» (Rather badly)

20. How do you asses the supervision by Martin Börjesson (assignment 6)

14 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»7 50%
Very well»7 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Know about Lp and try to solve practical problem for the students. » (Rather well)

21. To what extent was the open character of the biogas assignment (you had to define your own task) a positive element of the course?

14 svarande

Small extent»2 14%
Some extent»6 42%
Large extent»4 28%
Great extent»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

- It was too open.» (Some extent)
- Its good. But i dont understand the page limit if Ahlgren still wants six or seven pages. I also think that the correction have some problem.» (Some extent)
- The taks was intresting, but needs free chois or better guiding.» (Some extent)

22. To what extent has the assignment student presentations (your own and your fellow student´,s) been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»2 14%
Some extent»6 42%
Large extent»5 35%
Great extent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.35

- Interesting presentations. » (Some extent)
- Always good to practise presentations. Did not do so much for the learning but you should definately keep them!» (Some extent)

23. To what extent has the peer assessment of the assignment reports (assessments of our report by your fellow students and your assessment of your fellow student´,s reports) been of help for your lea

14 svarande

Small extent»2 14%
Some extent»3 21%
Large extent»7 50%
Great extent»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.64

- It is good with some feed back and not only the thing from the teachers when its to late.» (Large extent)
- it is only from he assignments I have earned some thing from this course.» (Great extent)

24. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»6 42%
Some extent»7 50%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 1.71

- What literature!?» (Small extent)
- No literature but other material. Most not conected to the exam or the projects. » (Small extent)

25. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

14 svarande

Very badly»1 7%
Rather badly»3 21%
Rather well»8 57%
Very well»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.78

- Hompage ok. But other thing was the worst during my Chalmers time. No email answers and the Pm come on the first lecture. There is very much of compulsary moments and students have other courses and lives so its good to no some day before. Problem with schedules, changes of dates, groups and other practical things. And the time for corecting the projects was to long.» (Very badly)
- The administration can e performed better in many ways. Almost every time information has been spread it is in the last minute. Erik are really slow answering emails where he has to write more then yes or no, some time there are no answer at all. » (Rather badly)
- Organization of opponent groups were not too well, took too long to figure out. Also, the hand in and out would easier be handled through the student portal.» (Rather well)
- Not perfect timing and so on, things were not posted when they were ought to» (Rather well)

Study climate

26. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

14 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 7%
Rather good»5 35%
Very good»6 42%
I did not seek help»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.64

- No good answer from Ahlgren but some of his assitant gave good oppertunities to help.» (Rather good)
- if you find the person and can ask him in person. » (Rather good)

27. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

14 svarande

Very poorly»1 7%
Rather poorly»1 7%
Rather well»4 28%
Very well»8 57%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

- One quit and we were only two people.» (Rather well)

28. How was the course workload?

14 svarande

Too low»1 7%
Low»3 21%
Adequate»8 57%
High»2 14%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.78

- Much work on writing reports. Maybe they should not be that extensive.» (Adequate)
- The projects take a lot of time. I think they can do better quality on the projet and dont have a regular exam.» (Adequate)

29. How was the total workload this study period?

14 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 14%
Adequate»6 42%
High»4 28%
Too high»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

- Depended on an the other course which was easier.» (Adequate)

Summarizing questions

30. What is your general impression of the course?

14 svarande

Poor»2 14%
Fair»5 35%
Adequate»1 7%
Good»5 35%
Excellent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

- Not well organized. Lack of baseline. » (Poor)
- They have to do something about this. I dont know what Ahlgren want with this course. Somtimes I think he likes teaching but he do things wrong and somtimes I think i hate it. » (Poor)
- The god thing are the assignments, except them there are not any thing new in the course, if you are a MPSES student. n the exam we were supposed to perform hand calculations some thing hat we have not done any thing during the course. If there are going to be such tasks there also has to be a part of the course. maybe there could be a assignment were we are suppose to make cost approximations and so on. The knowledge a used on the exam to answer this question were things I have learned in previous courses and not in this one. » (Fair)
- The Idea of the course is ok but the way it is handled today is rather poor. It should be more meaty and not only based on scientific articles apart from the project.» (Fair)
- But needs som more structure» (Good)
- Best course i have taken at Chalmers!» (Excellent)

31. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- all the tutors.»
- The assignments should be kept! Or maybe skip or redefine the first two assignments so the due date for assignment 3 could be set earlier. This would have even out the workload to some extent.»
- The assignments 4,5,6»
- The assignments»
- The assignments. »
- Projects»
- the assignments, perhaps wit some modification.»
- Assignment 4 and 5»
- project 3-6»
- the way of workgin with several assignments»

32. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- cant say anything.»
- Start earlier with the group assignments so that the last one is not the week before the exam.»
- The same group should make an oposition of the same report as presentation!»
- The lectures. Make them more interesting.»
- Lectures, organasition, planning most be much better. There is a lot of better courses in the primary school. I think its better with a higher project standard and dont give an exam.»
- assignment 3 needs imporving and information about dealins in general»
- more and better lectures.»
- Find relevant course text material. It"s of course good that the students don"t have to pay for any course literature but since the recommended reading in this course seemed extremely unrelevant I would have prefered to pay for GOOD course material and be able to learn something.»

33. Additional comments

- I think its a Chalmers rule that the bounus point should be given for one year (3 exams) and not only for the first. I will also recomend the teachers to read the exam before. I think its quite embarrasing with so much mistakes on the tecnical side in an exam. I.e biogas in a diesel engine and so on.»
- I is good i those who correct the reports ha the same guidelines as we has been given. And when it is a limit of maximum of 8 pages when we are writing including pictures, it is good if that this is the case when they are corrected as well and suddenly not just guidelines.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från