Visa resultat

Course evaluation Industrial Engineering, MTT050

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

15 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»		2		13%
Around 20 hours/week»		7		46%
Around 25 hours/week»		2		13%
Around 30 hours/week»		1		6%
At least 35 hours/week»		3		20%

Genomsnitt: 2.73

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

15 svarande

0%»		0		0%
25%»		0		0%
50%»		0		0%
75%»		6		40%
100%»		9		60%

Genomsnitt: 4.6

- A lot of the course material has been covered in other courses (virtuell produktion, produktionssimulering, grundkurser på Z)» (75%)
- Peter är jätte omotiverad till att föreläsa.» (100%)
- Good with many guest lecturers» (100%)
- Somewhere around 90%» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

3. How understandable are the course goals?

I have not seen/read the goals»		1		6%
The goals are difficult to understand»		0		0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»		6		40%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»		8		53%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- i see the goals as to enable one to comprehend the steps in method engineering in detail.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

15 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»		1		6%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»		14		93%
No, the goals are set too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.93

- As mentioned before: there is a lot of repetition from old courses» (No, the goals are set too low)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

No, not at all»		0		0%
To some extent»		9		60%
Yes, definitely»		4		26%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»		2		13%

Genomsnitt: 2.53

- The questions on the exam were to public.» (To some extent)
- The exam was fair, not that hard but on the other hand this subject isn"t exactly rocket science...» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		1		6%
Some extent»		7		46%
Large extent»		7		46%
Great extent»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- Klaus kom in som en frisk fläkt och då är han i 65 års åldern!!!» (Small extent)
- Sometimes there wasn´,t a good flow in the teaching. It felt that a lecture that took 2 hours could have been completed in 30 min.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		1		6%
Some extent»		5		33%
Large extent»		8		53%
Great extent»		1		6%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

8. What did you think of the AviX exercise?

Very good»		0		0%
Good»		7		46%
Ok»		7		46%
Not good»		1		6%
Bad»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- A bit to long film to analyse» (Good)
- Maybe a shorter setup could have been chosen. It didn"t feel very satisfying to just repeat a couple of steps over and over again. I think everyone woukd"ve got the picture anyway.» (Good)
- it would have been better if the introduction about the step by step procedure to work with avix had been made available in the course home page.» (Good)
- Didn"t need to be that big we learned the idea after 10 min and than we just marched for the end.» (Ok)
- To long video to analyze! If you want to make sure that everybody learns the AviX-system then it would have been better to have groups consisting of 2 persons and a short video.» (Ok)
- No good explanation of how you should do the exercise or to what detail and no follow-up. AviX is good to know about but this exercise can be done more thorough with some feedback.» (Not good)

9. What did you think of the Company visit (PPA light) exercise?

Very good»		4		26%
Good»		10		66%
Ok»		1		6%
Not good»		0		0%
Bad»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.8

- It is always good to visit the real world.» (Very good)
- i would rate a basic knowledge of PPA that we have had during this course as one of the best outcomes after taking this course.» (Very good)
- That was good, but maybe it took too much time to get reach the goals, and of course the time from he presented us the exercise to hand-in was too short somehow.» (Very good)
- Maybe I felt it was TO light» (Good)

10. What did you think of the DFA exercise?

Very good»		1		6%
Good»		5		33%
Ok»		7		46%
Not good»		1		6%
Bad»		1		6%

Genomsnitt: 2.73

- It was too late for the exercise while we have focused on reading our both courses. He might give us that sooner, not in the last week.» (Good)
- We knew to litle about it, hade to do alot of assumptions» (Ok)
- Good exercise but also lacks feedback.» (Ok)
- The swedish student have worked with DFA may times before. It really was so basic that you could have done it on high school, not in a masters program. At least it could have been placed in LV1 instead of the last week of the period when everybody in the masters program have a lot to do with the Simulation course.» (Bad)

11. What did you think of the Volvo Cars visit?

Very good»		10		66%
Good»		5		33%
Ok»		0		0%
Not good»		0		0%
Bad»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.33

- Nice to see how they work.» (Very good)
- practical demonstration of line balancing, manual work measurement and standardization.(The presentations were good and so was the tour).» (Very good)
- It had some points for me while I compare that to some other Automobile brands manufacturing. That was short, clear and useful.» (Very good)
- Very good! Not the usual company propaganda but informative and with a very good Q&A session!» (Very good)
- Volvo should have offered free lunch» (Good)

12. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

Very badly»		0		0%
Rather badly»		0		0%
Rather well»		6		40%
Very well»		9		60%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- Good in general, would be nice to get feedback on the exercises online on the course homepage for every group. A problem is that the person uploading files is the only one who can see that the file is uploaded, creates some confusion.» (Rather well)
- No complaints, course material was available when needed.» (Very well)
- The uploading of files on studieportalen was very useful. » (Very well)

Study climate

13. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

Very poor»		0		0%
Rather poor»		1		6%
Rather good»		2		13%
Very good»		8		53%
I did not seek help»		4		26%

Genomsnitt: 4

14. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

Very poorly»		0		0%
Rather poorly»		1		6%
Rather well»		5		33%
Very well»		9		60%
I did not seek cooperation»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

- Due to big differences in knowledge level of how to wright a report within the group.» (Rather poorly)
- The groupwork assignments have helped the co operation to foster.» (Very well)

15. How was the course workload?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		2		13%
Adequate»		10		66%
High»		1		6%
Too high»		2		13%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- The demands of the exercises felt very low. We didn"t put any effort into them but they seemed to be ok anyways.» (Low)
- The reading material was large(textbook, DFMA,scientific management), but unlike from the management course, explanations were more explicit and more technical so it was interesting as well.» (High)
- They gave us lots of stuffs that to some extent we really ran out of the time to read all of them in order to get the points that the literatures would offered. I think that it seems as if they do not know that we had another course to do work on it as well!» (Too high)

16. How was the total workload this study period?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		0		0%
Adequate»		3		20%
High»		7		46%
Too high»		5		33%

Genomsnitt: 4.13

- There is an old jungle-saying: Keep away from the S2 department and feel good.» (Adequate)
- The project work in Simulation of production simulations given by Bertil Gustavsson, is too large and it is too hard to get higher grades than 3. I suggest that he gives a smaller project work next year, so more focus can be put on the Industrial Engineering course.» (Too high)
- because of the simulation assignment» (Too high)
- Probably because the larger share of the workload was demanded by the other course we had to take. it is called"simulation of production systems".» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

17. What is your general impression of the course?

Poor»		0		0%
Fair»		0		0%
Adequate»		4		26%
Good»		11		73%
Excellent»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.73

- due to the poor motivated teacher. He might not be poor motivated he is just not teacher material. That"s a fact.» (Adequate)
- Most is good in general» (Good)
- But too high for one quarter with these extra documents offered.» (Good)
- The workload in the coarse came very late with all exercise and so on. Could start with the avix and ppa earlier..» (Good)

18. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

19. What should definitely be changed to next year?

20. Additional comments