ENKÄTER

 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.


Course Evaluation Advanced Vehicle Dynamics 2010, TME101

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-05-26 - 2010-06-26
Antal svar: 6
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 25%
Kontaktperson: Mathias Lidberg»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers


Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

6 svarande

<15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»3 50%
Around 30 hours/week»2 33%
Around 40 hours/week»1 16%
>50 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

2. Attendance on lectures

How many per cent of the lectures did you attend?

6 svarande

<25%»0 0%
25-50%»0 0%
50-75%»2 33%
>75%»4 66%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

3. Attendence on problem solving sessions

How many per cent of the problem solving sessions did you attend?

6 svarande

<25%»1 16%
25-50%»0 0%
50-75%»3 50%
>75%»2 33%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3

- sometimes it was just mathematics and no understand physically problems.» (50-75%)

4. Attendance on assignments sessions

How many per cent of the lectures did you attend?

6 svarande

<25%»0 0%
25-50%»0 0%
50-75%»3 50%
>75%»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5


Teaching and course administration

5. What is your opinion of the main course text book by Pacejka?

6 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»5 83%
Very good»1 16%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.16

6. What is your opinion of the lecture notes?

6 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»5 83%
Very good»1 16%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.16

- Very good!» (Very good)

7. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

6 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»4 66%
Very well»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- Good» (Rather well)

8. What is your opinion of the material selected for the lectures?

6 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»6 100%
Very good»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3

9. What is your opinion of the teaching in lectures?

6 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»5 83%
Very good»1 16%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.16

10. What is your opinion of the material selected for the problem solving sessions?

5 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»5 100%
Very good»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3

- Could be better and more related to lectures! » (Rather good)

11. What is your opinion of the teaching in the problem solving sessions?

5 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»2 40%
Rather good»3 60%
Very good»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- Good but IT must exist problems for US to solve after also so enhance the learning.» (Rather bad)

12. What is your opinion of the material selected for the assignments sessions?

5 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»4 80%
Very good»1 20%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- Liked them, was learning and fun!» (Very good)

13. What is your opinion of the work load of the assignments?

5 svarande

Very bad»1 20%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»4 80%
Very good»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- Too much work load» (Very bad)
- It was a big work load and took alot of time!» (Rather good)
- a lot of work was required for assignment so quite complicated at the begining but that allowed to progress faster!!» (Rather good)

14. What is your opinion of teaching in assignments sessions?

5 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»4 80%
Very good»1 20%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.2

15. What is your opinion about using Simulink as tool in this course?

- Very good, since it made me more skilled at it!»
- Simulink is a good tool.»
- Simulink is good to undertand the vehicle dynamics as a system.»
- Good»
- it"s an suitable tool for assignments then use this tool is good in this lecture.»

16. What is your opinion about the lab at Stora Holm?

6 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»1 16%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»5 83%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- Driving was fun but we never got to work with the data collected to make a handling diagram...so I don"t know what was the point. I think the lab could be made into an assignment. I think the assignment simulation is important but for me the physical measurements and applying what we learned is more important» (Rather bad)


Study climate

17. How is the general study climate in the master programme?

5 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»2 40%
Very good»3 60%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.6

18. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

5 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»4 80%
I did not seek help»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 4.2

- Perfect!» (Very good)

19. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

5 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»0 0%
Very well»5 100%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

20. How was the course workload?

5 svarande

1 (Too low)»0 0%
0 0%
1 20%
3 60%
5 (Too high)»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 4

- It should be high at this level and it was good, but the grade should be 50/50 or more since the assignments took up 60-70% of the hours!» (4)


Summarizing questions

21. How well did the course fullfill your expectations?

5 svarande

1 (not at all)»0 0%
0 0%
2 40%
2 40%
5 (very well)»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.8 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

22. What is your general impression of the course?

5 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 20%
Good»2 40%
Excellent»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.2

23. What is your opinion of the material selected for the exam?

5 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»4 80%
Very good»1 20%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- The questions must be less, and the points distributed more equal on the questions.» (Rather good)

24. What is your opinion of the work load during the exam?

5 svarande

Very bad»1 25%
Rather bad»1 25%
Rather good»2 50%
Very good»0 0%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.25

- Make it shorter since 4h wasn´,t enough!» (Very bad)
- may be a little high» (No opinion)

25. What is your opinion of the level of difficulty of the exam?

5 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»2 40%
Rather good»3 60%
Very good»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- A bit too hard» (Rather bad)
- Was hard» (Rather good)
- The point distribution was a little off. in some questions the work load were alot higher for the same amount of points as shorter ones.» (Rather good)

26. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Assignments 1-2-3! Stora Holm»
- The lab at stora holm»
- Lab at Stora Holm, the third assignment»
- the session at Stora holm»

27. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Problem solving sessions, and make exercises for us to study home!»
- The difficulty of the assignments. There is too much programming.»
- More exams with solutions should be handed out, or try to make a problemsolving book. just something so you can practice on solving problems. there were to little home study questions in the course»
- difficulty of the exam and in problem solving session stay longer on understanding physical problem.»

28. Additional comments

- thank you for this lecture.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.8

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.8
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.7


Kursutvärderingssystem från