ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Foundations for photonics engineering, MCC045, MPMPE,HT2007

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2007-12-11 - 2008-01-25
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 61%
Kontaktperson: Lena Peterson»
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 6 54%

Around 20 hours/week» 2 18%

Around 25 hours/week» 2 18%

Around 30 hours/week» 1 9%

At least 35 hours/week» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.81

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%» 1 9%

25%» 2 18%

50%» 2 18%

75%» 5 45%

100%» 1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.27

- The lectures were not good at all. The teacher just read form the PowerPoint slides, which were good but I could just as well read them on my own. The tutorials with Åsa were good.» (25%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

11 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 3 27%

The goals are difficult to understand» 2 18%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 5 45%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.36

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 2 22%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 7 77%

No, the goals are set too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.77

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

10 svarande

No, not at all» 0 0%

To some extent» 2 20%

Yes, definitely» 5 50%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 3 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent» 4 36%

Some extent» 4 36%

Large extent» 3 27%

Great extent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.9

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent» 3 27%

Some extent» 3 27%

Large extent» 5 45%

Great extent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.18

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly» 0 0%

Rather badly» 2 18%

Rather well» 4 36%

Very well» 5 45%

Genomsnitt: 3.27

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor» 1 9%

Rather poor» 1 9%

Rather good» 1 9%

Very good» 7 63%

I did not seek help» 1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly» 1 9%

Rather poorly» 2 18%

Rather well» 2 18%

Very well» 4 36%

I did not seek cooperation» 2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

11. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low» 1 9%

Low» 2 18%

Adequate» 4 36%

High» 4 36%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

12. How was the total workload this study period?

11 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 1 9%

Adequate» 5 45%

High» 3 27%

Too high» 2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor» 3 27%

Fair» 2 18%

Adequate» 3 27%

Good» 3 27%

Excellent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.54

- The workload on the EXAM was to high, not during the corse. There was SO much to do and so little time. » (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The tutorials.»
- The lab Answers to home assignement on the web page.»
- The thourougly prepared handouts, especially those from the tutor. The course content was also good. »

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The lectures.»
- less home assignements. Maybe 4 is enough»
- First of all, the exam. I have written many exams at chalmers and this was the first one I failed, allthough having aquired a suffient knowledge to be well above the limit. I"m not a first-year student, I know when I know something nowadays. Also, the exam wasn"t totally matched to the course. There were hardly any tutorials until very late, and doing all calculations was very though. It was practically impossible to do anything without the tutorials and the handouts therefrom. And the calculations on the exam required a lot of work, not just knowledge. Filter and matching assignments have been rather rare on earlier exams, and having two of such a kind on the same exam was...unexpected, to say the least.»

16. Additional comments

- Good lectures. Good handouts. Good that the lectures didn"t consist of reading the hand outs out loud. Good tutorial hand outs, they are essential for the students. To do the excercises without examples to follow, just the formulas and text from the book, is very hard in this course. From what I have understood, the tutorials are held later inthe course for us to have lectures on as much as possible before the labs. Yet, what was needed to make the labs were not learnt until afterwards anyway. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från