Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.


Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-05-24 - 2010-06-24
Antal svar: 20
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 33%
Kontaktperson: Lars-Erik Gadde»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Klass: Övriga
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Övriga studenter

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

20 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»10 50%
Around 20 hours/week»7 35%
Around 25 hours/week»1 5%
Around 30 hours/week»1 5%
At least 35 hours/week»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 1.8

- Mostly thanks to very good lectures and lecture slides» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

20 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»3 15%
50%»5 25%
75%»9 45%
100%»3 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- uninspiring lectures» (25%)
- I really wantet to attend more, but the Thusdays overlapped with another course. » (25%)
- Maybe be more like the seminars with examples from the industry» (50%)
- I was writing my master thesis at the same time and was therefore unable to attend in more of the teaching» (50%)
- taking courses at Handels tt sometimes caused schedule conflicts..» (75%)
- I missed all the seminars» (75%)
- I would say 90%. but that was not among the choices!» (75%)
- Would attend 100% but had other things to do on that time, also sometimes 8 o"clock felt too early» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

20 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»4 20%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 30%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»10 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

- Unfortunately, the course syllabus does not clearly describe what I am supposed to do to achieve those goals» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

19 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»2 10%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»17 89%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.89

5. Have the content of the course helped you to achive the goals?

19 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»5 26%
Yes, definitely»12 63%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.84

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent»2 10%
Some extent»6 30%
Large extent»6 30%
Great extent»6 30%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- Since I was unable to attend most of the classes. The classes I attended helped me.» (Some extent)
- I really liked the seminars and the business game! If I would have been able to attend the classes I would probebly have choosed "to a great extent". » (Some extent)
- Lars-Erik is very interesting and puts everything forward in a simple and at the same time advanced manner.» (Great extent)
- Thanks to LEG!» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course material been of help for your learning?

- the course book
- the articles

20 svarande

Small extent»2 10%
Some extent»7 35%
Large extent»7 35%
Great extent»4 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.65

- Some of the articles were good but with other articles it was unclear what was important with them, what they had to do with the course or their was to much "mumbo jumbo".» (Small extent)
- First six articles were very good, easy to follow and understand, but later articles were more difficult, and I couldn"t finish them (There was no course book, you should change the question)» (Some extent)
- I think a course book could be helpful.» (Large extent)
- I would have liked a course book... I learned definitly most from the powerpoints. » (Large extent)
- Really interesting course materials. I had a great time reading it, when compared to several other courses. » (Great extent)
- New articles mixed with theoretical framework in the course formed a great basis for learning.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

20 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 5%
Rather well»7 35%
Very well»12 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

- I would have prefered to apply to the business game on the web page instead.» (Rather well)
- Sometimes I felt I would like to have more frequent updates on what is coming» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

20 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»5 25%
Very good»12 60%
I did not seek help»3 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

20 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 5%
Rather well»7 35%
Very well»12 60%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

- I were sick of working with the SAME group as so many times earlier... (due to highly diffrent ambitions levels.) » (Rather poorly)
- Unfortunately, we talked Swedish in out group as all members were Swedish, which reduced learning a bit» (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

20 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»3 15%
Adequate»14 70%
High»3 15%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- I think it could be a good idea with individual term papers / literature seminars in addition to the current examination design, so that individual reflection will be "accelerated". The "cases" were good, for instance.» (Low)
- Adequate, but the grade will show if I"m correct or maybe if I overestimate my studying efforts» (Adequate)
- Too many paper need to be read» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

19 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 5%
Adequate»5 26%
High»9 47%
Too high»4 21%

Genomsnitt: 3.84

- I was only studying at 50% at chalmers..» (?)
- I had "lean production" course too.» (High)
- Due to my thesis work» (High)
- Not due to this course.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

20 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»3 15%
Adequate»4 20%
Good»10 50%
Excellent»3 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.65

- A lot of the covered areas have already been covered in previous courses» (Fair)
- It has a clear structure» (Good)
- I think it is a very intressting subject!» (Good)
- Could be better, but unclear directions/guidelines for the seminars and the assignments» (Good)
- I liked the idea of combining marketing and SCM. So far we mainly have focused on the supply part. » (Excellent)
- One of the best courses I took within the SCM programme.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Business runner (make it mandatory) as a part of the examination. The "cases": maybe try to develop these further, by making them mandatory, and make the students prepare for the cases by e.g. writing half a page of reflections before and after...»
- The business runnner exercise and the seminars. These two made one see things in a new light. »
- everything»
- Articles, busniess runner, Lars-Erik and the assignments at the host company»
- seminars and S1 S2 S3»
- The three seminar cases.»
- The seminars. »
- Business Runner the articles»
- the assignments, seminars and business runner»
- Game Runner, guest lectures and seminars»
- The assignment with the host company»
- Gadde, the business game and the seminars»
- Seminars were the most giving lectures, where I learned how to apply other lectures" knowledge, thus extremely good help for the exam, I also appreciated the closing lecture that covered the whole course and provided structure, and especially the last slide about how to answer exam questions (essay, not point list)»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Some articles offer redundant information. The assignments are a bit big considering the amount of credits. Business Runner Game was useless and the game leaders arrogant and inefficient.»
- »
- More examples from industry»
- The seminars, more discussion would be better»
- the E articles. I don" think if they helped me a lot. there were a lot of pages to read but not much to to be found out relevant to course.»
- maybe a coursebook... »
- Please randomize groups for the assignments and make description of assignments and seminars clearer»

16. Additional comments

- I think is a subject that definitely needs more of individual reflection. The group assignments is ok for this, but not enough. I think that a short "home exam" or "term paper" could be a good thing in order to improve individual reflection. Maybe they do not need to be more than 2 pages or so. And, e.g. constitute around 10 % of the examination. It is hard to show ones capabilities in analyzing on a "regular" exam in a subject like this. So, my suggestion: add a home small exam/term paper ...»
- More and also more relevant guest lectures could be very helpful.»
- More students would attend the earlier hours if the lectures always begin at 9»

17. To what extent did the guest lectures contribute to your learning?

19 svarande

Small extent»4 21%
Some extent»11 57%
Large extent»4 21%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- did not attend.» (?)
- Liked the Flexlink lecture. The Papyrus guest lecture was also interesting. However, the person was a bit too self-centered.» (Some extent)
- I missed quite a few» (Some extent)
- I missed one or few and the ones I attended wasn"t that interesting.» (Some extent)
- Missed many of them» (Some extent)
- Connection to the course content unclear until closing lecture» (Some extent)

18. To what extent were the three seminars helpful for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 10%
Large extent»8 40%
Great extent»8 40%
Did not attend»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Only attended one» (Some extent)
- missed most of them, the seminar I attended was great» (Large extent)
- Seminars were the greatest part of the course!» (Great extent)

19. To what extent was Assignment A (The distribution network of X) useful for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent»4 20%
Some extent»7 35%
Large extent»7 35%
Great extent»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.35

- Sick of writing about that company! » (Small extent)
- It was unclear what were the deliverables of this assignment, so we spent more time discussing what we are supposed to write than on the analysis itself» (Small extent)
- I know that the "host company" concept is new this year, but I think that the different host company assignments (within the different courses) should be coordinated to a higher extent. We have, more or less, done the same task over and over again. Maybe try to differentiate and define the tasks more within the different courses. Assignment A was rather good interesting. However, I think that the task can be more specified and structured, so that the students know what is expected.» (Some extent)

20. To what extent was Assignment B useful for your learning

20 svarande

Small extent»5 25%
Some extent»8 40%
Large extent»5 25%
Great extent»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

- Its content wasn"t much different from other SCM-courses, so I didn"t really learned anything new, and as deliverables were unclear I didn"t apply this course"s learning on the assignment either» (Small extent)
- Good, but, as always when it comes to the assignments, I think that the task can be more precise, so that it is more clear what is being asked for.» (Large extent)

21. To what extent was the Businessrunner useful for your learning

20 svarande

Small extent»3 15%
Some extent»1 5%
Large extent»7 35%
Great extent»5 25%
Did not participate»4 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

- I felt that it was not connected to the course. It took a lot of time. » (Small extent)
- It showed me to put customer in focus, that is key.» (Large extent)
- I really enjoyed it!» (Large extent)
- Unfortunately we didn"t even get to the five best, and I hate to lose, so the initial impression was very negative, but I will remember the learnings for whole my life, so it was very good in that sense» (Great extent)
- Suggestion: Make this mandatory. And, add "seminars" after the business runner, so that the students can reflect between the groups how other participants were thinking etc...» (Did not participate)
- missed it, would have liked to participated. I like the idea.» (Did not participate)

22. To what extent did the written exam reflect the course content

18 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 16%
Large extent»7 38%
Great extent»3 16%
Did not participate»5 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

- Have not done it yet.» (?)
- havent done it yet» (?)
- One of the most adequate exams during my four years at Chalmers» (Great extent)
- Have not written it yet since it is on 26th.» (Did not participate)
- Haven"t taken it yet» (Did not participate)

Kursutvärderingssystem från