Visa resultat

DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS, TEK115

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

20 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»		10		50%
Around 20 hours/week»		7		35%
Around 25 hours/week»		1		5%
Around 30 hours/week»		1		5%
At least 35 hours/week»		1		5%

Genomsnitt: 1.8

- Mostly thanks to very good lectures and lecture slides» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

20 svarande

0%»		0		0%
25%»		3		15%
50%»		5		25%
75%»		9		45%
100%»		3		15%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- uninspiring lectures» (25%)
- I really wantet to attend more, but the Thusdays overlapped with another course. » (25%)
- Maybe be more like the seminars with examples from the industry» (50%)
- I was writing my master thesis at the same time and was therefore unable to attend in more of the teaching» (50%)
- taking courses at Handels tt sometimes caused schedule conflicts..» (75%)
- I missed all the seminars» (75%)
- I would say 90%. but that was not among the choices!» (75%)
- Would attend 100% but had other things to do on that time, also sometimes 8 o"clock felt too early» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

3. How understandable are the course goals?

I have not seen/read the goals»		4		20%
The goals are difficult to understand»		0		0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»		6		30%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»		10		50%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

- Unfortunately, the course syllabus does not clearly describe what I am supposed to do to achieve those goals» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

19 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»		2		10%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»		17		89%
No, the goals are set too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.89

5. Have the content of the course helped you to achive the goals?

No, not at all»		0		0%
To some extent»		5		26%
Yes, definitely»		12		63%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»		2		10%

Genomsnitt: 2.84

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		2		10%
Some extent»		6		30%
Large extent»		6		30%
Great extent»		6		30%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- Since I was unable to attend most of the classes. The classes I attended helped me.» (Some extent)
- I really liked the seminars and the business game! If I would have been able to attend the classes I would probebly have choosed "to a great extent". » (Some extent)
- Lars-Erik is very interesting and puts everything forward in a simple and at the same time advanced manner.» (Great extent)
- Thanks to LEG!» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course material been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent»		2		10%
Some extent»		7		35%
Large extent»		7		35%
Great extent»		4		20%

Genomsnitt: 2.65

- Some of the articles were good but with other articles it was unclear what was important with them, what they had to do with the course or their was to much "mumbo jumbo".» (Small extent)
- First six articles were very good, easy to follow and understand, but later articles were more difficult, and I couldn"t finish them (There was no course book, you should change the question)» (Some extent)
- I think a course book could be helpful.» (Large extent)
- I would have liked a course book... I learned definitly most from the powerpoints. » (Large extent)
- Really interesting course materials. I had a great time reading it, when compared to several other courses. » (Great extent)
- New articles mixed with theoretical framework in the course formed a great basis for learning.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

Very badly»		0		0%
Rather badly»		1		5%
Rather well»		7		35%
Very well»		12		60%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

- I would have prefered to apply to the business game on the web page instead.» (Rather well)
- Sometimes I felt I would like to have more frequent updates on what is coming» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

Very poor»		0		0%
Rather poor»		0		0%
Rather good»		5		25%
Very good»		12		60%
I did not seek help»		3		15%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

Very poorly»		0		0%
Rather poorly»		1		5%
Rather well»		7		35%
Very well»		12		60%
I did not seek cooperation»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

- I were sick of working with the SAME group as so many times earlier... (due to highly diffrent ambitions levels.) » (Rather poorly)
- Unfortunately, we talked Swedish in out group as all members were Swedish, which reduced learning a bit» (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		3		15%
Adequate»		14		70%
High»		3		15%
Too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- I think it could be a good idea with individual term papers / literature seminars in addition to the current examination design, so that individual reflection will be "accelerated". The "cases" were good, for instance.» (Low)
- Adequate, but the grade will show if I"m correct or maybe if I overestimate my studying efforts» (Adequate)
- Too many paper need to be read» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		1		5%
Adequate»		5		26%
High»		9		47%
Too high»		4		21%

Genomsnitt: 3.84

- I was only studying at 50% at chalmers..» (?)
- I had "lean production" course too.» (High)
- Due to my thesis work» (High)
- Not due to this course.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

Poor»		0		0%
Fair»		3		15%
Adequate»		4		20%
Good»		10		50%
Excellent»		3		15%

Genomsnitt: 3.65

- A lot of the covered areas have already been covered in previous courses» (Fair)
- It has a clear structure» (Good)
- I think it is a very intressting subject!» (Good)
- Could be better, but unclear directions/guidelines for the seminars and the assignments» (Good)
- I liked the idea of combining marketing and SCM. So far we mainly have focused on the supply part. » (Excellent)
- One of the best courses I took within the SCM programme.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

16. Additional comments

17. To what extent did the guest lectures contribute to your learning?

Small extent»		4		21%
Some extent»		11		57%
Large extent»		4		21%
Great extent»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- did not attend.» (?)
- Liked the Flexlink lecture. The Papyrus guest lecture was also interesting. However, the person was a bit too self-centered.» (Some extent)
- I missed quite a few» (Some extent)
- I missed one or few and the ones I attended wasn"t that interesting.» (Some extent)
- Missed many of them» (Some extent)
- Connection to the course content unclear until closing lecture» (Some extent)

18. To what extent were the three seminars helpful for your learning?

Small extent»		0		0%
Some extent»		2		10%
Large extent»		8		40%
Great extent»		8		40%
Did not attend»		2		10%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Only attended one» (Some extent)
- missed most of them, the seminar I attended was great» (Large extent)
- Seminars were the greatest part of the course!» (Great extent)

19. To what extent was Assignment A (The distribution network of X) useful for your learning?

Small extent»		4		20%
Some extent»		7		35%
Large extent»		7		35%
Great extent»		2		10%

Genomsnitt: 2.35

- Sick of writing about that company! » (Small extent)
- It was unclear what were the deliverables of this assignment, so we spent more time discussing what we are supposed to write than on the analysis itself» (Small extent)
- I know that the "host company" concept is new this year, but I think that the different host company assignments (within the different courses) should be coordinated to a higher extent. We have, more or less, done the same task over and over again. Maybe try to differentiate and define the tasks more within the different courses. Assignment A was rather good interesting. However, I think that the task can be more specified and structured, so that the students know what is expected.» (Some extent)

20. To what extent was Assignment B useful for your learning

Small extent»		5		25%
Some extent»		8		40%
Large extent»		5		25%
Great extent»		2		10%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

- Its content wasn"t much different from other SCM-courses, so I didn"t really learned anything new, and as deliverables were unclear I didn"t apply this course"s learning on the assignment either» (Small extent)
- Good, but, as always when it comes to the assignments, I think that the task can be more precise, so that it is more clear what is being asked for.» (Large extent)

21. To what extent was the Businessrunner useful for your learning

Small extent»		3		15%
Some extent»		1		5%
Large extent»		7		35%
Great extent»		5		25%
Did not participate»		4		20%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

- I felt that it was not connected to the course. It took a lot of time. » (Small extent)
- It showed me to put customer in focus, that is key.» (Large extent)
- I really enjoyed it!» (Large extent)
- Unfortunately we didn"t even get to the five best, and I hate to lose, so the initial impression was very negative, but I will remember the learnings for whole my life, so it was very good in that sense» (Great extent)
- Suggestion: Make this mandatory. And, add "seminars" after the business runner, so that the students can reflect between the groups how other participants were thinking etc...» (Did not participate)
- missed it, would have liked to participated. I like the idea.» (Did not participate)

22. To what extent did the written exam reflect the course content

Small extent»		0		0%
Some extent»		3		16%
Large extent»		7		38%
Great extent»		3		16%
Did not participate»		5		27%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

- Have not done it yet.» (?)
- havent done it yet» (?)
- One of the most adequate exams during my four years at Chalmers» (Great extent)
- Have not written it yet since it is on 26th.» (Did not participate)
- Haven"t taken it yet» (Did not participate)