Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Foundations for microwave engineering, EME106, MPMPE,HT2007

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2007-12-11 - 2008-01-25
Antal svar: 12
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 60%
Kontaktperson: Lena Peterson»
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

12 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 8%
Around 20 hours/week»4 33%
Around 25 hours/week»5 41%
Around 30 hours/week»2 16%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

12 svarande

0%»1 8%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 8%
75%»6 50%
100%»4 33%

Genomsnitt: 4

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

12 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 8%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 8%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»7 58%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 25%

Genomsnitt: 3

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

12 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»10 83%
No, the goals are set too high»2 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.16

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

12 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»7 58%
Yes, definitely»2 16%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»3 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- The exam was difficult compared to the problems solved on the tutorials. The exam paper did not state what the required score was to achieve different grades, nor was there any maximum scores written anywhere. Not good at all!» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the lectures been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»1 9%
Some extent»5 45%
Large extent»4 36%
Great extent»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.45

- Piotr rules» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the tutorials been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»1 9%
Some extent»2 18%
Large extent»7 63%
Great extent»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

8. To what extent has the home assignments and practical exercises been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent»1 8%
Some extent»3 25%
Large extent»8 66%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.58

9. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent»3 25%
Some extent»5 41%
Large extent»4 33%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.08

- Collins book is not an introductory book, I have studied from the Pozars book instead.» (Small extent)
- Collins is difficult to read. It takes a couple of readings to understand what he is trying to say.» (Some extent)
- I think selecting Pozar as a literature is a better choice rather than Collin.» (Some extent)

10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

12 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 16%
Rather well»9 75%
Very well»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.91

- Only one document was put up on the homepage. It would have been nice if most of the papers handed out in class also were available on the course homepage. At least the lab manual should have been there.» (Rather badly)
- It was better if in addition to binder, lecture materials were put on the website in PDF format.» (Rather badly)

Study climate

11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

12 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 8%
Rather good»3 25%
Very good»8 66%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.58

12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

12 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 8%
Rather well»4 33%
Very well»5 41%
I did not seek cooperation»2 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

13. How was the course workload?

12 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 50%
High»5 41%
Too high»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.58

- It is difficult to get an understanding with this pace in course» (Too high)

14. How was the total workload this study period?

12 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 50%
High»5 41%
Too high»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.58

Summarizing questions

15. What is your general impression of the course?

12 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 8%
Adequate»3 25%
Good»8 66%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.58

16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Personel»

17. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Make the course smaller or over the longer period of time»
- Stop charging money for bad copies of the viewgraphs and put them on the web instead. People can print them if they want them, or they could be sold cheaper without the worthless binder.»
- the literature»
- The literature (Collin).»

18. Additional comments

- There was no one who could get 5 in the course. So, I think the procedure should be changed in a way to have at least 10-20% of 5 grades in the course!»

Kursutvärderingssystem från