ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Sustaianble Building C, ARK 242

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-05-23 - 2010-06-01
Antal svar: 12
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 54%
Kontaktperson: Michael Edén»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Arkitektur 300 hp
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Arkitektur 300 hp

Goals and fullfilment of goals

The learning outcomes are given in the course programme, that is the knowledge, understanding, skills and perspectives you are expectd to reach. Notify for each outcome how well they have been fulfilled.

1. Learning outcome 1

After the course you should be able to
Explore the issues identified as critically important for sustainable transformation.

12 svarande

Very insufficient»0 0%
Insufficient»1 9%
Sufficient»7 63%
Excellent»3 27%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3.18

- A lecture about the challenge of a rehabilitation project would have been useful for the one who didn"t attempt to the conservation class» (Insufficient)
- The field trip to Germany was very educational and has helped towards expanding the knowledge regarding transformation issues.» (Sufficient)

2. Learning outcome 2

After the course you should be able to prove your capacity to arrange gathered knowledge and findings into a programme for a project

12 svarande

Very insufficient»0 0%
Insufficient»0 0%
Sufficient»9 81%
Excellent»2 18%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3.18

3. Learning outcome 3

After the course you should be able to synthesize the findings from the analysis into a design proposal

12 svarande

Very insufficient»0 0%
Insufficient»0 0%
Sufficient»7 63%
Excellent»4 36%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3.36

4. Are the aims and goals reasonable in relation to your pre-knowledge ?

12 svarande

No, the goals are to elementar»0 0%
Yes, the goals are reasonable»11 100%
No, the goals are too ambitious»0 0%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Are the goals reasonable in relation to the scope and amount of credits?

12 svarande

Too small scope in relation to credits»0 0%
Reasonable scope in relation to credits»10 90%
Too wide scope in relation to credits»1 9%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.09

Education and course administration

Education concerns three parts: The given lecture and literature, the excursion and the research made by "stayers"

6. What support have you got for your learning from course literature and other material?

Concerns the theses report and the lecture

12 svarande

Very little»0 0%
Rather little»5 45%
Rather big»5 45%
Very big»1 9%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.63

- An introduction class about ventilation"s main principles would have been nice about a week before the tutoring» (Rather little)

7. What support have you got from the reports from the "stayers"?

12 svarande

Very little»0 0%
Rather little»5 41%
Rather much»5 41%
Much»2 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

8. What support or informationhave you got from the excursion

First question about the excursion

11 svarande

Very little»0 0%
Rather little»2 18%
Rather much»6 54%
Much learning and exchange»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

- Some of the visitings could have been shorter so other ones would have gotten some more time.» (Rather much)
- Excursion was so useful.» (Much learning and exchange)

9. What kind of inspiration did you get from the excursion

Not only for the project but also form a more general aspect

11 svarande

Very little»0 0%
Rather little»1 9%
Rather much»6 54%
Very much»4 36%

Genomsnitt: 3.27

10. How did the organisation, memoranda, direct information etc. function?

I am already quite aware of the bad localities for the final assessment

12 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»1 9%
Rather well»7 63%
Very well»3 27%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3.18

- The consultation with the ventilation engineer could have been arranged as a lecture, since a lot of the comments were the same for all the groups. Perhaps a lecture would have been more informative and touch a broader spectrum of issues. The fact that we got a simple formula for calculating the size of the ventilation ducts was a very useful tool. The same remark as the previous parts of the course: These kind of information is what I was expecting from the Sustainable Building course and it would have been better if we had more time and exercises regarding these issues (a more technical approach maybe).» (Rather well)

Work environment

11. How do you rate the possibilities to get assistance and ask questions?

12 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather well»5 41%
Very well»6 50%
I have not asked for assistance»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- Consultations were so useful but we needed more time for consultation.» (Rather well)

12. How has the cooperation between you and students in your group been?

12 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»3 25%
Very good»7 58%
I have not tried to cooperate»2 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.91

- Regarding work within the individual group.» (Very good)
- In the final group cooperate» (Very good)

Concluding questions

13. What is your overall opinion of the course?

12 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
Passed»1 8%
Good»7 58%
Very good»4 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.25

- I like the free thinking, your alowed to to basicly whatever you want. No restraints. This makes you more creative and pushes you to think outside the box. You find the balance of whats reasonable to do on your own and that built up some confidence in me. Thank you Michael for three good courses!» (Good)

14. What should be preserved next year?

- excursion»
- -»
- The varity of problems to solve in one project. That´,s good as a final project that sums up the three courses.»
- The subject : a sustainable transformation, really interesting»
- The teachers attitude towards the students, the workshops and the excursion, the common project.»
- excursion!!»
- the excursion»
- the excursion was very good to see the detail and different system of construction.»
- the mix of Group & individule work, study visit, passive house workshop, tutorial with students and teacher from engineering department.»
- the professor,assistant(Barbarah)and excursion should be preserved.»

15. What shuold be changed the nest year?

- the drawings from the client should be more clear»
- -»
- more time for the actual project. Design and presentation takes a long time even though its made on computers. The designpart has to be done in a hurry in order to get the presentation ready.»
- much more time devolved to the project an other way to organize the tutoring (a time for each group instead of several groups in the same hours_ the last group has never enough time_)»
- More time regarding exersices and calculation methods.»
- maybe adding a bit more lectures»
- maybe have the technical lectures (ventilation, etc) before going to the excursion so you can have an idea of what to look at»
- More information in specific system and detail regarding Swedish standards.»
- wish there will be more lectures»
- It should be better the team members has been chosen by the professor to learn more group work with different cultures and nationalities.»

16. Other comments

- the teacher is professional»
- -»
- The course collides hughly with the architectural competition course. Thats too bad because its says on chalmers homepage that the competition is an elective course for mpdsd. Then you assume that the schedule works etc... Also that to spread out 22,5 P over the whole spring semester makes it hard to get the practical matters to work. Either make it 30 P or concentrate it to three study periods. That would be good.»
- thank you so much for this semester!»
- the course was interesting and very worth to take,lots of information different from previous course»
- I like the teacher humor.»
- I am very satisfied with the outcome of this course.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från