|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
HIgh voltage engineering, MTT035, MPEPO,HT2007Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2007-12-11 - 2008-01-25 Antal svar: 30 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 49% Kontaktperson: Lena Peterson» Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.03 - The couse gave little time for self study» (Around 20 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.65 - due to overlap classes of other course» (75%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.48 - some parts were not clear. I could not follow.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.28 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.17 - The goals are on the border to too high. High lot of different concepts to learn» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable) 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?28 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.57 - The exam was heavy in a scense that the theoretical questions were too timeconsuming (for me about 2.5 h if not more, which is not in accordance with the respective points on the exam which is 50%). Then there was no time to think when it came to the calculative questions. I got about 5 minutes to think at the the only question I needed to, and I didn´,t take any other kind of breaks, but was writing for four hours! And even if I had figured out how to calculate that exercise I would not have had any time to do it, bcaouse the time was up... So, I was a bit dissapoined at the time consumption.» (To some extent) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the lectures been of help for your learning?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.13 - the teacher could perform better» (Some extent) 7. To what extent has the tutorials been of help for your learning?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.41 - the tutor is helpful» (Large extent) 8. To what extent has the laborations been of help for your learning?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.86 - well, no body allowed us to purely involve in laboration, it seems like a phd student is giving demostration and we`re looking at him, and in the last he handover some precalculated papers and then lab. is over...not appreciated at all.Laboration doest meant just to look whhat is going one and to look at one fellow what he is going and then the demostrator explaine the phenomenon on blackboard...is can be done by showing a lab. movie in lecturer room and the letter explaiining theory..this is was we have done in laboration...in both lab..» (Small extent) 9. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2 - I do prefer that instructor should have his own compendium, because all the recommended book are really tough to understand and time consuming.Hope this will be done in next course» (Small extent) 10. To what extent has it been useful to use ebooks as a complement to the course text book?28 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.75 - Haven"t used ebooks.» (?) 11. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.48 - because not all material in course web» (Rather badly) Study climate12. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.79 - very nicely...both Jörgen Blennow and Ellizabeth are very friendly and of helping attitute.» (Very good) 13. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.55 14. How was the course workload?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.03 - we dealed with too many subjects in the course, such as thermal and machanical stress» (High) 15. How was the total workload this study period?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.03 - i guess bit high...according to time..after having lecture and tutorials and labs from boith courses we did`t find much time to do at our own...since also we have to do some more things as well, daily needs, cooking , and etc...» (High) Summarizing questions16. What is your general impression of the course?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.03 - the teacher should improve his performance.
The tutor is well perform. I like her.» (Adequate) 17. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Jörgen and Elisabeth!»- The lecture and tutorial teachers should be in the course even next year. » - Tutor is really excellent and should be kept.Laboratories should be improved.» - The way the lectures, tutorials and laborations were performed.» - either reduce course contents or increase time for quarter...and for exam: » - The tutorials» - most of them like electric field basics, high voltage generation and testing, insulation coordination and testing,traveling waves most of them» - insulation cordination , surge arresters and lightning impulse» - the way lectures are given is very good.» - The teachers, both Jörgen and Elisabeth were great at what they were doing, among the best I"ve had. Elisabeth was very pedagogic, explained very clearly and Jörgen was great at keeping ones attention.» - The tutor» - all» - Jörgen and Elisabeth» - Practical topics like surge arrestors, insulation coordination and travelling wave» 18. What should definitely be changed to next year?- The lecture notes should be reviewed and corrected, but also clearified in some cases. Preferably a course compendium should be composed and sold.»- There should not be any lab report since it is really time consuming and add nothing to the understanding.Instead the assistance should assess the student preparation by asking some questions just before the starting of the lab session and based on that he can decide wheather they student is ready to carry out the eperiment or not. » - student should be allowed in setting up experiment » - More study visits etc. And earlier in the period. It was hard to calculate on things you really didnät know how they looked.» - the coursebook should be in time» - mechanical and thermal stresses, power system components better if they were included in another course » - Experimental methods» - I felt the tutorials differed a bit from the exam, which isn"t good. » - Some less workload, maybe with the labs, even if they were great this time.» - The LABs» - examination question should be spread out covering all the lessons taught in the class not focussed to particular lesson.» - The revision in the end, but it would have been better to have a bit sooner.» - theoretical topics like breakdown in gases etc» 19. Additional comments- Fun and interesting course!»- Looking forward to seeing some compendiums for the instructors here in Chalmers..» - All the guys were doing well. thank you very much. if an easy course literature is found that will be very helpful and the content of the course should be compressed.» - Competent lecturer/tutor/lab assistants» - Jorgan and Elizabeth are very good for the course» - The abstact part should be minimised and replaced with more of statistical approach to insulation coordination, more on the other switchgear equipment, like CVT and Circuit breaker selection should be treated like LA. Mechanical aspect should also be expanded with more practical applications» - The LAB is not helpful at all. We did not have chance to do anything, just see and write down the resullt, so boring :( Actualy, I did not understand well what I was doing in the LAB!» - The course should be more practical oriented like study visits to high voltage manufacturing groups and their utilization as in grid station etc» 20. To what extent has the study visit been of help for your learning?28 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.21 - I think an air insulated substation is more fun for us to visit since the components are visible. But sure, this was fun too.» (Small extent)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3%