Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Joining Technology 2010, MMK210

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-05-20 - 2010-06-10
Antal svar: 17
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 62%
Kontaktperson: Johan Ahlström»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

17 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 11%
Around 20 hours/week»5 29%
Around 25 hours/week»5 29%
Around 30 hours/week»4 23%
At least 35 hours/week»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.82

- studied mostly near exams» (Around 30 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

16 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»5 31%
75%»4 25%
100%»7 43%

Genomsnitt: 4.12

- between 90-95%» (?)
- I has to be absent to the course for an international meeting. Otherwise, I would like to attend 100% because I think the lecture is very interesting for me. » (50%)
- Actually a little less than 100, but closer to 100% than to 75% » (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals (learning outcomes)?

17 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»9 52%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»8 47%

Genomsnitt: 3.47

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

17 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»15 88%
No, the goals are set too high»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.11

- Goals are high but they should be in order to learn something.» (No, the goals are set too high)
- The course was interesting, but the readings for the Metallurgy part was quite difficult to digest and even more so to remember» (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

17 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»6 35%
Yes, definitely»6 35%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»5 29%

Genomsnitt: 2.94

- But I learned a lot from this course at least for the moment.» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

17 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 23%
Large extent»8 47%
Great extent»5 29%

Genomsnitt: 3.05

- Teaching helps with the parts that require understanding. Large part of the course however, is about remembering knowledge that doesn"t require so much understanding.» (Large extent)
- Needed for assistance for Johan"s part.» (Large extent)

7. Please judge the lectures and content on Welding techniques

Please give constructive criticism that will inspire the lecturer to develop the course content and lecturing style!

17 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 12%
Good»7 43%
Very good»7 43%
Did not participate»1

Genomsnitt: 3.31

- Slides could sometimes have offered a little more information, but Erik was very skilled in his area and interesting to listen to.» (Very good)
- » (Very good)

8. Please judge the lectures and content on Physical metallurgy

17 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»4 25%
Good»5 31%
Very good»7 43%
Did not participate»1

Genomsnitt: 3.18

- Johan should give more time to chapter 2 and give particular explanation of surface energy,driving forces for grains etc.Give some written text for welding simulation stuff as well.» (Good)

9. Please judge the lectures and content on Fatigue design

Please give constructive criticism that will inspire the lecturer to develop the course content and lecturing style!

17 svarande

Poor»3 20%
Fair»0 0%
Good»6 40%
Very good»6 40%
Did not participate»2

Genomsnitt: 3

- We should have more lectures on fatigue design. Maybe it is easier for the students who have chosen Fatigue course but I think most of us don´,t.» (Good)
- Maybe more examples and applications in real life» (Good)

10. How did you experience the Matlab assignment?

17 svarande

Poor»1 5%
Fair»5 29%
Good»9 52%
Very good»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.7

- For the next year perhaps a preparatory class that goes through a bit about the theory about the HAZ would be good in advance of the assignment.» (Good)
- It was a bit earlier to give the assignment.Perhaps it should be given in week 2 of study period.» (Good)

11. How did you experience the Welding Technology lab session?

16 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 6%
Good»5 31%
Very good»10 62%

Genomsnitt: 3.56

- Difficult to remember so much information that was received between each possibility to take notes (since no notebooks are allowed near the welding equipment)» (Good)

12. How did you experience the Welding Metallography lab session?

16 svarande

Poor»2 12%
Fair»4 25%
Good»7 43%
Very good»3 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.68

- The samples weren"t really well prepared. The surface of the samples was very uneven and so every time the sample was moved in any direction, there was a loss of focus. This made it very difficult so try and identify the different zones within the HAZ.» (Fair)
- The metal lab could have been updated with new microscopy methods. Connected to computers for example.» (Fair)
- Instructions were clear but sample was very difficult to analyse due to the very subtle differences between the zones» (Good)

13. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»5 31%
Large extent»8 50%
Great extent»3 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.87

- Both the metallurgy book and the welding handbook has a lot of mistakes.I think both of the books need to be proof read first.» (?)
- Book on metallurgy was very difficult to read» (Some extent)
- The book "Physical metallurgy in welding" was very good was well explained and at a high enough level. "Welding processes handbook" however, was worthless! The structure of that book is horrible and vital information about some processes and welding parameters can"t be found in it! Often the book gave a statement about something without ever even attempting to explain why that is so. Please try and find a replacement for "Welding processes handbook", because it was so bad.» (Large extent)

14. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

17 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 5%
Rather well»10 58%
Very well»6 35%

Genomsnitt: 3.29

15. How did you experience the study visit to ESAB?

17 svarande

Should be cancelled»0 0%
OK»1 8%
Interesting»6 50%
It gave me competely new insights - very interesting!»5 41%
Did not participate»5

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- Very interesting to see some of the more advanced methods such as submerged arc welding. It was good to talk to the people there about how things are done in reality, since there is often a difference between real life and theory.» (Interesting)

16. How did you experience the study visit to Volvo Pilot Plant?

17 svarande

Should be cancelled»0 0%
OK»4 28%
Interesting»5 35%
It gave me competely new insights - very interesting!»5 35%
Did not participate»3

Genomsnitt: 3.07

- I liked the visit to their "lab", but the lecture wasn"t as good. Since the place was very hard to find, perhaps a meet-up location should be used next year? Maybe at the bus stop at Volvo?» (OK)

Study climate

17. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

17 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»6 35%
Very good»10 58%
I did not seek help»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

- would be good if the shy could ask in another way» (Very good)
- Lecturers were very friendly and approachable» (Very good)

18. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

17 svarande

Very poorly»1 5%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»6 35%
Very well»10 58%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.47

- With the International students it was rather good, but Most Swedish students they were not willing to help international ones.» (Very poorly)
- Had some problems with a lazy group member, but since the assignment wasn"t all that heavy, it was easier to just do it instead of spending a lot of time complaining about it.» (Rather well)

19. How was the course workload?

17 svarande

Too low»1 5%
Low»1 5%
Adequate»12 70%
High»3 17%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Quite a low workload, but for me this was actually thankful since my other course was very demanding.» (Low)
- High after the labs, one week for writing the report is to short.» (Adequate)

20. How was the total workload this study period?

17 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»9 52%
High»8 47%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.47

- Very demanding second course.» (High)

Summarizing questions

21. What is your general impression of the course?

17 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 11%
Good»9 52%
Excellent»6 35%

Genomsnitt: 4.23

- Welding is a board subject for only 2.5 months. So it is reasonable that certain topic in the course can not be spreaded and go deep. So expecting more specific course about certain topic, e.g. defect formation, metallurgy analysis of weld, fatigue simulation of welding structure etc.» (Good)
- Some flaws such as the lousy handbook in welding, otherwise excellent.» (Good)

22. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- labs and study visit»
- The labs»
- All of the topic should definitely be preserved. Just certain part should be given more or deep information.»
- related welding factories to visit and study»
- everything»
- the labs and study visits»
- The matlab assignment and the two lab sessions.»
- Labs and study visits »
- Everything is to be preserved»
- Like the teaching and the reference to the book. extreamly good when reading.»
- Welding lab session!»

23. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Adding fatigue lab if possible»
- maybe the course can be divided into three parts in sequence: 1,welding procedure (basic, procedure, physics, etc), 2, welding metallurgy (phase tranform, HAZ metallurgy, etc), 3, Weld design (weld stress analysis, fatigue, etc). For me, each part is worth 7.5 score. »
- metallography lab instructions need to be improved.»
- Throw away "Welding processes handbook" it"s of very little help, takes a long time to read and the level of the material inside is low. »
- More exercises and expamples»
- The microscope lab»
- Perhaps the second lab was not very helpful»

24. Additional comments

- no»
- Course arrangement is very good which is impressed me. »
- excellent course content and administration.»
- Perhaps even more time could be spent on the metallurgy and fatigue parts in the course. About the different possible welding- and cutting methods, more time should be spent on a few of the more important ones, while some of the less common ones can be skipped. This part contains very little understanding, but rather demands that a lot of straight forward material be learnt by memory.»
- Professors with very good knowledge, well organized course, congratulations»

Kursutvärderingssystem från