Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Operations Improvement Projects, TEK165

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-05-17 - 2010-06-04
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 68%
Kontaktperson: Magnus Persson (Teknikens ekon»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Klass: Övriga
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Industriell ekonomi 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»4 36%
Around 25 hours/week»4 36%
Around 30 hours/week»2 18%
At least 35 hours/week»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Some weeks less and some more but I think this is the average time spend» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 18%
100%»9 81%

Genomsnitt: 4.81

- That was not much.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

10 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 20%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 10%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»7 70%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

- They could however be pasted into this questionnaire so that they can be read here.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

8 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»8 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- but we did extend our knowledge as well which is not stated as a goal» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

9 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 11%
Yes, definitely»6 66%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.11

- I didn"t think the projects tested so much previous knowledge, it was mostly new knowledge, so that aspect of the course goals was not completely fulfilled. The change management integration into the course felt unnecessary, at least we didn"t find a way to make it a part of the project.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»1 9%
Some extent»3 27%
Large extent»5 45%
Great extent»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

- Since we didnt have that much teachin (apart from with the tutor)» (Some extent)
- With teaching I mean the tutoring meetings.» (Large extent)
- if I see the supervision as teaching. the change management lecture did not bring any new knowledge, we learned more about change management in our first course» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»5 45%
Some extent»3 27%
Large extent»2 18%
Great extent»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 1.9

- there was no actual course literature» (Small extent)
- Didn"t have any what I know of.» (Small extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 18%
Rather well»1 9%
Very well»8 72%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

9. What is your impression of the "Project Simulation Exercise" (by Skanska)?

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»2 18%
Good»3 27%
Very good»6 54%

Genomsnitt: 4.36

- It was a fun exercise but it was rather unclear what we were supposed to learn from it that could be applied to something outside skanska.» (OK)

10. What is your impression of the guest lecture by Anna Nilsson-Ehle?

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»1 9%
OK»5 45%
Good»2 18%
Very good»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

- as mentioned above we learned more about change management in the qom course, it would be more intresting if she presented how it was actually conducted, if they used the unfreeze change refreeze approach for example» (Poor)
- Could be more focused on being applicable for us within the course. A little too much detail from volvo. More, whats her experiences and advices for us...» (OK)
- A bit interesting but I didn"t feel that it contributed to the project.» (OK)

11. What is your impression of the "project meeting"?

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»2 18%
Good»3 27%
Very good»6 54%

Genomsnitt: 4.36

- It was a good idea but I got the impression that not everyone took it so seriously and the feedback we got was not of so much use. Interesting to learn the method though.» (OK)
- had a lot of good input, however the problems were already almost solved at the meeting, it would be good if we could hand it in later» (Very good)
- Maybe have one even ealier» (Very good)

Study climate

12. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»3 27%
Very good»7 63%
I did not seek help»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

13. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 9%
Rather well»3 27%
Very well»7 63%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

- the workload on the swedish students gets too high when the international students can not write reports e.g. dont have any experoience in writing analysis so everything needs to be re-written» (Rather well)

14. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 54%
High»4 36%
Too high»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

- Too low in the beginnning and too much in the end» (High)

15. How was the total workload this study period?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 36%
High»5 45%
Too high»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

- the last period was much harder then the third» (High)
- Almost none in the beginning before we got the chanse to choose project and start working and work around the clock work in the last two weeks» (High)

Summarizing questions

16. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 9%
Good»6 54%
Excellent»4 36%

Genomsnitt: 4.27

- Interesting to do a real work for a company. Gives a lot of experience that lectures can not give.» (Good)
- What I learned mostly was group related and how to write a good report. » (Good)
- intresting to see the "real" world» (Excellent)

17. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The type of project»
- The number of mendatory lecture is good.»
- "Skanska-game"»
- That we got to take turns on eachothers projects (one for the project meeting and one for the presentation).»
- project simulation meeting»

18. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- improve the change management lecture»
- Make it possible to start earlier. For example to choose project in the end of the previous quarter. »
- Maybe there can be some more lectures about useful fields.»
- maybe do the project meeting a little earlier to allow more input to be incorporated into the projects»
- There are some conflicts between supervisors about the structue of the report. I know that every research needs special structure but a meeting can be held between supervisors and structural framework can be given at the begining. »
- I would prefer that the projects are more focused on knowledge gained and the possibility to test them in a real company, for example QFD, robust design, DoE etc. We should definitely have a one on one conversation with our tutor to discuss the project and group personally. I really missed the oppotunity to air myself. There should also be possible to give different grades to the people in the group, like in the bachelor thesis. The workload was very awry among the group members but this was not because of laziness of some, it was because of other inabilities that could not be fixed through a conversation with them.»

19. Additional comments

- maybe get the chance to use the opposition-feedback in the final report (-> final hand-in a week or so later)»
- Might be a good idea to mix students in a way that is more carefully thought of. We definitely did not have a problem but in our project some activities on site had to be done in Swedish (and a lot of literature was only in Swedish as well) It"s a shame beacause then the foreign students miss out and extra work load is put on the swedish students.»
- What was most horrible during the project was the contribution from some of the international students. Their English was so poor that communication suffered from it but mostly it affected the quality of the report which ended up in many hours just to rewrite their parts.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från