ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Microwave Projects, part I, MCC060, MPMPE, VT2010, MCC060

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-05-17 - 2010-05-31
Antal svar: 5
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 35%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

5 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 20%
Around 20 hours/week»1 20%
Around 25 hours/week»2 40%
Around 30 hours/week»1 20%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

5 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»2 40%
75%»2 40%
100%»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

5 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 20%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 80%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

5 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 20%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»4 80%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.8

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

5 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 20%
Yes, definitely»4 80%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»1 20%
Some extent»1 20%
Large extent»3 60%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 25%
Large extent»2 50%
Great extent»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 3

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

5 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»5 100%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- some printed hand outs were not available on the student portal. » (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

4 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»4 100%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

5 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 20%
Rather well»1 20%
Very well»3 60%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

11. How was the course workload?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 50%
Adequate»0 0%
High»2 50%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

12. How was the total workload this study period?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 60%
High»2 40%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

5 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 20%
Adequate»1 20%
Good»3 60%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Presentation feedback and comments.»
- This course gives a practical project that is interesting.»
- well project work, and labs . »
- both projects»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Each group should be given a complete FMCW radar project to design and implement. »
- the project should be better directed, define the leader, and the strategy within the group comparing it with the theory taken from the lectures. The grades of the handouts of the project shoudlnt be individual. as due to limitations someone else could have more material than others to speak in the presentation and writing in the report. some things common for all groups ( block diagrams, link budget) were written and explained by 1 group and is not coherent to make 5 reports and 5 presentations about the same topics of the same project.»
- We need more time to build and test a complete practical project.»
- some more fun gathering among members. Some practical visit of microwave devices, companies and industries in more detail.»
- the involvment in the project.»

16. Additional comments

- In general, the course is good»
- Good teachers so far»

Kursutvärderingssystem från