|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Superconducting devices: fundamentals and applications, MCC015, MPNAN, VT2010, MCC015Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2010-05-17 - 2010-05-31 Antal svar: 7 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 50% Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Teknisk fysik 300 hp
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.6 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.33 - varied widely from week to week.» (?) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.28 - Everything unless there was a clash» (75%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 - The format of the grading could be clearer and presented at the first class.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?6 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.83 - The question regarding Andreev Physics one where supposed to do some calcualtions on a ScN-junction. This type of junction was not mentioned on the lectures and not described in the lecture notes. I think it"s quite strange that there is a question about something that"s not in the course.» (To some extent) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.57 - Own notes were very important» (Some extent) 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.42 - Since there might be the case that everyone is not registered for the course or is able to attend the first lecture the teacher won"t have access to all of the students email adresses. This happend to me so I didn"t get any info regarding the course, e.g. cancellning of lectures etc. It"s much better to post ALL info regarding the course on the homepage. The same goes for all the course material. It would also be good if the email adresses to all teachers/lab supervisors were posted on the home page. » (Very badly) Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?6 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.66 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.42 11. How was the course workload?7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.42 - A bit badly spread over the lecture period (little in the beginning and everything in the end)» (Adequate) 12. How was the total workload this study period?5 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.8 Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.85 - Its a perfect course for people from QDP.» (Excellent) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The laborations along with their theory sessions.»- Nice handins!» - The homework assignments, but more evenly spread out. Now, there was little work the first few weeks and which increased to 4 hand-ins in the last week.» - Diversity is very nice» - Having all the different topics presented by the various teachers to get a good overview of possibilities within the field.» - The content.» 15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Better communication between teachers to avoid misunderstandings (such as lecture times). Floriana is too democratic. Leonids lecture was a bit off topic.»- A bit more descriptive lecture notes are needed.» - See if some for of rearrangement of the work is possible Bolometer lecture should be more technical» - The workload needs to be better balanced over the course of the study period. Administration could have gone much more smoothly in terms of ensuring teachers remember the schedule, or to reschedule when problems arise, communicating about what assignments are, when labs will be, posting material online, etc. Having a teacher in charge and present at all lectures I think would be quite helpful in this regard.» - The administration of the course.» 16. Additional comments- Good work Floriana!»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
16%