Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Superconducting devices: fundamentals and applications, MCC015, MPNAN, VT2010, MCC015

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-05-17 - 2010-05-31
Antal svar: 7
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 50%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Teknisk fysik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

6 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 16%
Around 20 hours/week»2 33%
Around 25 hours/week»3 50%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

- varied widely from week to week.» (?)
- More in the end» (Around 20 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

7 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»5 71%
100%»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 4.28

- Everything unless there was a clash» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

7 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 14%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 57%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 3

- The format of the grading could be clearer and presented at the first class.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

7 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»7 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

6 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 33%
Yes, definitely»3 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

- The question regarding Andreev Physics one where supposed to do some calcualtions on a ScN-junction. This type of junction was not mentioned on the lectures and not described in the lecture notes. I think it"s quite strange that there is a question about something that"s not in the course.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 28%
Large extent»3 42%
Great extent»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 3

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 42%
Large extent»4 57%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

- Own notes were very important» (Some extent)
- Some of the teachers" material was clear and useful. Others were not always clear and were sometimes difficult to follow.» (Some extent)
- Some of the material have covered far more than the lectures.» (Large extent)
- The book was too expensive.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

7 svarande

Very badly»1 14%
Rather badly»3 42%
Rather well»2 28%
Very well»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

- Since there might be the case that everyone is not registered for the course or is able to attend the first lecture the teacher won"t have access to all of the students email adresses. This happend to me so I didn"t get any info regarding the course, e.g. cancellning of lectures etc. It"s much better to post ALL info regarding the course on the homepage. The same goes for all the course material. It would also be good if the email adresses to all teachers/lab supervisors were posted on the home page. » (Very badly)
- A bit disorganized. many deadlines to keep track of. Would be nice if this information could be available in a simple table on the homepage for example, instead of being in 10 different mails» (Rather badly)
- Handouts in .doc and .ppt instead of pdf made some equations disappear, which was annoying. The updates weren"t continuous, but instead came in clumps.» (Rather badly)
- A better system for reminding the teacher"s with scheduled lectures/labs of when they are to present would have been helpful. It would be good to have the coordinating teacher present at all lectures in order to avoid confusion regarding hand-outs and rescheduling and other such administrative issues.» (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 33%
Very good»4 66%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

7 svarande

Very poorly»1 14%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 14%
Very well»5 71%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

11. How was the course workload?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 71%
High»1 14%
Too high»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

- A bit badly spread over the lecture period (little in the beginning and everything in the end)» (Adequate)
- The workload was too heavily biased towards the last few weeks. In the beginning (March+April) there was not much work to do at all (excepting Dr. Shumeiko"s work of course). Towards the end when I would have preferred to be studying for the exam, I found myself scrambling to write lab reports and assignments.» (Adequate)
- There were to much hand-ins at the end of the course. They should have been spread out more during the course. One shouldn"t put deadlines during the easter holiday, since we are supposed to have one week of vacation and one week for exams.» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 40%
High»2 40%
Too high»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 14%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»5 71%
Excellent»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

- Its a perfect course for people from QDP.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The laborations along with their theory sessions.»
- Nice handins!»
- The homework assignments, but more evenly spread out. Now, there was little work the first few weeks and which increased to 4 hand-ins in the last week.»
- Diversity is very nice»
- Having all the different topics presented by the various teachers to get a good overview of possibilities within the field.»
- The content.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Better communication between teachers to avoid misunderstandings (such as lecture times). Floriana is too democratic. Leonids lecture was a bit off topic.»
- A bit more descriptive lecture notes are needed.»
- See if some for of rearrangement of the work is possible Bolometer lecture should be more technical»
- The workload needs to be better balanced over the course of the study period. Administration could have gone much more smoothly in terms of ensuring teachers remember the schedule, or to reschedule when problems arise, communicating about what assignments are, when labs will be, posting material online, etc. Having a teacher in charge and present at all lectures I think would be quite helpful in this regard.»
- The administration of the course.»

16. Additional comments

- Good work Floriana!»

Kursutvärderingssystem från