Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Nanobioscience for information processing, MCC020, MPNAN, VT2010, MCC020

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-05-17 - 2010-05-31
Antal svar: 4
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 21%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Teknisk fysik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

4 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 25%
Around 20 hours/week»2 50%
Around 25 hours/week»1 25%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Interesting course, I would have liked to spend more time but my other course took to much time.» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

4 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»3 75%
100%»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 4.25

- Approximately 90% » (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

4 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 75%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- Great to have learning outcomes for every single lecture!» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

4 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»4 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

4 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 25%
Yes, definitely»2 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 3

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»1 25%
Great extent»3 75%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- Zoran is one of the best lecturers I"ve had during my time on Chalmers (5 years)» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 25%
Large extent»2 50%
Great extent»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 3

- too much material to read...» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

4 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 25%
Rather well»1 25%
Very well»2 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- There was a lot of information but it was not very structured. Lectures had different names in course PM and on the homepage. Some lectures and learning outcomes were missing. Would have liked to always have lecture notes in advance. The handwritten notes are barely readable, should be redone. It would be a lot better if they just were scanned in with better resolution and contrast. Doesn"t have to be rewritten completely.» (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

4 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»4 100%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Zoran was very keen that every one understood.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

4 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 25%
Very well»2 50%
I did not seek cooperation»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 4

11. How was the course workload?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 25%
Adequate»3 75%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- There was great opportunities to spend a lot more time on this course but sadly I didn"t have the time.» (Low)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 25%
High»3 75%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

4 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 50%
Good»1 25%
Excellent»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- Very interesting and well executed by Zoran, Aldo was also good and very professional. Good span between basics of biology and advanced DNA computing.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Zoran and the lecture learning outcomes. And the short film clips on transcription and translation process.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Please upload readable lecture notes...»
- One student, in his/her own (less refined) words, requested that the lectures on bionics etc be improved. Also requested: more structure and order on the course home page.» (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)

16. Additional comments

- Thank you Zoran for a very interesting course and for your fantastic commitment for the students learning!»

Kursutvärderingssystem från