ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Semiconductor materials physics, FMI040, MPNAN, VT2010, FMI040

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-05-17 - 2010-05-31
Antal svar: 7
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 26%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Teknisk fysik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

7 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 28%
Around 20 hours/week»3 42%
Around 25 hours/week»1 14%
Around 30 hours/week»1 14%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.14

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

7 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»3 42%
100%»4 57%

Genomsnitt: 4.57

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

7 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 28%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 42%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

5 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»5 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

5 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 60%
Yes, definitely»0 0%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- The questions on the exam was vaguely worded, it could clearer.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»3 42%
Some extent»1 14%
Large extent»3 42%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Bad structure on the lecturers, unclear figures in the powerpoint.» (Small extent)
- The whole course felt unplanned. The teacher was not motivated. » (Small extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»2 28%
Some extent»2 28%
Large extent»2 28%
Great extent»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.28

- The course would benefit from another course book with clearer figures etc.» (Small extent)
- The course book was really bad, lot"s of errors. Figures was terrible. Hard to follow. Hardly any material to study on, not many exercise-questions with solutions or answers. And yet the exam is based on solving problems. So it is hard to study and learn what was essential in the course due to lack of problems. And when there was answers to problems, they where often obviously wrong or not completed. Summary: Terrible course material.» (Small extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

7 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 14%
Rather well»4 57%
Very well»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

- It would be good if more information was posted on the web page» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

7 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 28%
Very good»4 57%
I did not seek help»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

7 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 14%
Rather well»3 42%
Very well»2 28%
I did not seek cooperation»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

11. How was the course workload?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 57%
High»2 28%
Too high»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

- Had to spend to much time on this course due to bad material and bad teaching. » (Too high)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 42%
High»3 42%
Too high»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

7 svarande

Poor»2 28%
Fair»1 14%
Adequate»1 14%
Good»3 42%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- the course content are good»
- labs, mini project, lectures by Shumin was absolutely fine»
- Nothing.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- i think the lab experiment need offer us more practical work.»
- There should be possible to make the labs, or some report instead, if you miss one. »
- there should be some Home assignments, the compendium should be revised.»
- The course compendium, more solved problems/better solutions to the problems in the book.»
- Make a problem book with good solutions that explains the theory behind the solution. Make the teaching more inspiring. Use another course book. »

16. Additional comments

- One of the worst planned courses I"ve ever taken on Chalmers.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från