Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Project work in microtechnology, MKM130, MPMIC, VT2010, MKM130

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-05-17 - 2010-05-31
Antal svar: 7
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 36%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

7 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 28%
Around 20 hours/week»0 0%
Around 25 hours/week»1 14%
Around 30 hours/week»2 28%
At least 35 hours/week»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

7 svarande

0%»1 14%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»0 0%
100%»6 85%

Genomsnitt: 4.42

- Only one lecture (?) that was introduction and I missed that one because it was in the beginning of the study period.» (0%)
- It should be clearly stated if attendance is mandatory or not. Now it seems like it isn"t. Make sure that the schedule do not collide with other courses, specially not another recommended course which were the case now (Nanobioscience).» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

7 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 28%
The goals are difficult to understand»2 28%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 14%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

- I don"t think that there are any stated goals. The ones stated in student portal are not sufficient. » (The goals are difficult to understand)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

6 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 16%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»5 83%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.83

- Yes. The project works as a continuation of the previous courses in the program.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

6 svarande

No, not at all»3 50%
To some extent»0 0%
Yes, definitely»1 16%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

- I have no idea. There are no guidelines available for the students to read about which the basis for examination are.» (No, not at all)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»4 57%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»3 42%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.85

- I have only learned about the other projects. The teaching haven"t been to instructive for my project.» (Small extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»4 57%
Some extent»1 14%
Large extent»2 28%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.71

- no course literature » (Small extent)
- Course literature?» (Small extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

7 svarande

Very badly»1 14%
Rather badly»1 14%
Rather well»2 28%
Very well»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Info about report layout, seminar schedule and stuff always came out rather late. Very little information about grade criteria was listed. Hard to know what grade to expect in relation to time and effort spent.» (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

7 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»2 28%
Rather good»2 28%
Very good»3 42%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

7 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 14%
Rather well»1 14%
Very well»3 42%
I did not seek cooperation»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

- Me and my partner had a good collaboration.» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

7 svarande

Too low»1 14%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 57%
High»1 14%
Too high»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

- work on the project everyday» (Too high)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

7 svarande

Too low»1 14%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 57%
High»2 28%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 14%
Adequate»2 28%
Good»4 57%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

- Interesting to have the opportunity to work with a company and do "real" stuff. Got that not all projects were the same (research and literature studies. BUT 2-3 projects about nano fibres was a bit to much to listen to... » (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The contacts with companies in the industry.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- to limit the work load»
- Make sure that the schedule do not collide with other courses, specially not another recommended course which were the case now (Nanobioscience).»
- Why all these monthly seminars? Almost no new stuff to present after one month since last seminar. If the seminars are compulsory then they should actually be compulsory and some kind of attendance list should be filled in. It"s not ok to have students leaving when ever they want so that only 4-5 people are left in the end of the seminars!»

16. Additional comments

- State that the attendance is mandatory or not. Perhaps divide the seminars to both morning and afternoon session. Now it seems to be too long. »
- One student, in his/her own (less refined) words, requested more attentive listening and pleasant interaction from the teacher during the seminars.» (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)

Kursutvärderingssystem från