Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Optoelectronics MCC055, MPMPE, VT2010, MCC055
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2010-05-17 - 2010-05-31 Antal svar: 11 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 35% Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.11 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 2 | | 18% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 4 | | 36% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 2 | | 18% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 3 | | 27% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.54 - Attending lectures are most of time sufficient to understand the course material, just a brief reading was helpful» (Around 30 hours/week)
2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 11 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 1 | | 9% |
50%» | | 1 | | 9% |
75%» | | 5 | | 45% |
100%» | | 4 | | 36% |
Genomsnitt: 4.09 - all the teaching collided with an other course for me» (25%)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?11 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 1 | | 9% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 2 | | 18% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 8 | | 72% |
Genomsnitt: 3.63 - They were fully met.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)
4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.11 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 10 | | 90% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 1 | | 9% |
Genomsnitt: 2.09 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?11 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 1 | | 9% |
Yes, definitely» | | 6 | | 54% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 4 | | 36% |
Genomsnitt: 3.27 - Seemed to be alot of laser questions on the exam» (To some extent)
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?11 svarande
Small extent» | | 1 | | 9% |
Some extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Large extent» | | 3 | | 27% |
Great extent» | | 7 | | 63% |
Genomsnitt: 3.45 - The tutorials were really useful and well done» (Large extent)
- The course was beautifully arranged and organized.» (Great extent)
7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?11 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 1 | | 9% |
Large extent» | | 3 | | 27% |
Great extent» | | 7 | | 63% |
Genomsnitt: 3.54 - Very good literature, and reasonably prized» (Large extent)
- course compendium was very helpful.Its language is very good to follow and understand» (Great extent)
8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?11 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 4 | | 36% |
Very well» | | 7 | | 63% |
Genomsnitt: 3.63 - Definitely organized and efficient.» (Very well)
Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?11 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 2 | | 18% |
Very good» | | 9 | | 81% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.81 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?11 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 1 | | 9% |
Rather well» | | 5 | | 45% |
Very well» | | 5 | | 45% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.36 11. How was the course workload?11 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 5 | | 45% |
High» | | 5 | | 45% |
Too high» | | 1 | | 9% |
Genomsnitt: 3.63 - The last two weeks maybe could be better organized since we had two assignments, two labs and the project. Maybe it could be good to have the first lab earlier during the course.» (Adequate)
12. How was the total workload this study period?11 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 4 | | 36% |
High» | | 5 | | 45% |
Too high» | | 2 | | 18% |
Genomsnitt: 3.81 - much because of the other course» (High)
Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?11 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 1 | | 9% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
Good» | | 4 | | 36% |
Excellent» | | 6 | | 54% |
Genomsnitt: 4.36 - The course teaching was very good, however both the project and the lab assignments, were very bad, as they were inflexible, too much demanding, and should not be a part of this course, and I have left the course this term because I missed one lab exercise, so that they refused to allow me at another time, and I have to come back next year because of that » (Fair)
- One of the best course in this master program» (Excellent)
- Ths one is one of the best courses that I ever did!» (Excellent)
14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Lectures, Labs, Tutorials»
- I do not think any change is necessary for next year»
- The tutorials and lectures are very good. The Labs were a great learning experience too. Everything was nicely structured. I would say this is the most organized and well structured course amongst all that I have attended till date :)»
- Tutorial sessions, project, Home assignments, »
- The tutorials and the home assignments not mandatory. The overall structure of the course is very good.»
- Everything is fine.»
- the labs, they were very interesting»
15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Course work load is a little high. It can be reduced somehow.»
- Everything should be saved for next year.»
- We have Labs during the last few weeks of the course. Also, there are a number of tutorials (2 atleast)that are required to be submitted in the last days. This creates a lot of pressure as we have other courses also. Also, the presentation could be done in the mid of the course instead of last week since the topics anyway require self study and research. »
- Home assignments should be revised, they are too easy.»
- The schedule for the labs, spreading them during the course.»
- The project work should be stared little bit earlier so that the total course workload can be easily managable.»
- The idea of not giving out solutions to exams. Why this? You are OBLIGATED to hand the exams out, and they precisely tell us students what is essential in the course and what will be tested if students have learnd. So why deny us students the solutions, and I mean not just answers (they are more/less useless) but the whole solution. They are provide a very good way of gaining understaning of how to solve problems and as said before, they reflect what students are supped to learn.»
- 1- project need to be with the same teacher as the course material
2- lab exercises should be supervised by the course teacher, and not by the Phd students. »
16. Additional comments- No comments!»
- Overall the taking this course was a good learning experience for me.»
- Very nice and interesting course.»
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|