ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Computational Fluid Dynamics for Engineers, KKR072

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-05-17 - 2010-05-26
Antal svar: 19
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Bengt Andersson»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

18 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»2 11%
Around 25 hours/week»1 5%
Around 30 hours/week»5 27%
At least 35 hours/week»10 55%

Genomsnitt: 4.27

- Really high load for this course.» (Around 20 hours/week)
- very time consuming :D» (At least 35 hours/week)
- Probably more than 35 hours.» (At least 35 hours/week)
- Extremely time consuming course!» (At least 35 hours/week)
- The most time demanding course this far at Chalmers.» (At least 35 hours/week)
- Det var en väldigt tidskrävande kurs, den motsvarar inte 7.5 hp.» (At least 35 hours/week)

2. How large part of the lectures offered did you attend?

19 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 5%
50%»1 5%
75%»8 42%
100%»9 47%

Genomsnitt: 4.31

- 90 %» (100%)

3. How large part of the scheduled time for tutorials did you attend

Not including writing the report

19 svarande

Less than 50%»0 0%
51% to 75%»0 0%
76% to 100%»3 15%
More than the sceduled time»16 84%

Genomsnitt: 3.84

- Det krävdes en del extra tid för att hinna med dem. » (More than the sceduled time)

4. How many hours did you spent on writing the reports for the tutorials

- 5 hours»
- 4 hours»
- may be 4 to 6 hours each tutorial.»
- It was parallel with doing tutorials»
- initially 2-3 hrs per tutorial »
- 2 hr per tutorial»
- 2 hours per tutorial»
- at least 8 hours each»
- 4-5h/week»
- about five hours/ report»
- 3-4 hours»
- About 10 hours each + time for simulations»
- We spended about 10-15hr writing exept for tutorial three which was less time consuming.»
- Reasonable... a little hard to estimate but largest part was definately spent on simulations and learning about fluent. approximaely: 2-3 hours on the reports»
- Vi försökte skriva rapporterna parallellt som vi gjorde uppgifterna så det är svårt att säga men ett antal timmar per tutorial blev det i alla fall. »

5. How large part of the scheduled time did you spend on the project

Exclude the time you spend on writing the report

19 svarande

less than 50%»0 0%
51% to 75%»3 15%
76% to 100%»1 5%
More than 100%»15 78%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

- I am not sure what you are asking for... but if I put it this way, once the project assignment was available I used all sheduled time and lot of time outside the sheduled to do the report.» (51% to 75%)
- It was a very practical project to understand different aspects of CFD» (More than 100%)
- Really big project. I spent days and nights on it. » (More than 100%)
- Projektet krävde mycket extra tid.» (More than 100%)

6. How many hours did you spend on writing the report

- 1.5 days»
- 20 hours»
- May be 10 to 20 hours, but not consecutively. I wrote the report in pieces.»
- too many»
- About 48 hrs for the project»
- ~20-25, should have spent more»
- 7 hours»
- more than 20 hours»
- around 80 h or more.»
- about 50 hours»
- 8 h»
- 20 hours»
- 20 hours»
- About 30hr»
- approciamtely: 24 hours»
- Även här skrev vi rapporten parallellt men det blev väldigt många timmar vi la på skrivandet, många helger och kvällar. »

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

7. How understandable are the course goals?

19 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»4 21%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 26%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»10 52%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

- I couldn"t find any syllabus» (I have not seen/read the goals)
- It could be good to have a PDF file with the syllabus.» (I have not seen/read the goals)

8. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

16 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»12 75%
No, the goals are set too high»4 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

- There are a little too much information during the weeks until the project starts. But I realize that it is necessary in order to be able to do the project. » (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)
- Difficult without a chemical background (it is good to have a chemical student per group)» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)
- Although very nice outcomings of the course, I think it is better to specify more creadits than 7.5 for this course, if it is possible» (No, the goals are set too high)
- De är godtagbara med avseende på min bakgrund och förkunskaper men inte med tanke på att kursen bara ska vara på 7.5 hp.» (No, the goals are set too high)

9. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

18 svarande

No, not at all»1 5%
To some extent»8 44%
Yes, definitely»7 38%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.55

- There should be only the oral exam as the actual learning can be assessed.» (To some extent)
- Discretization scheme? It was mostly about the last chapters of the book.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

10. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

19 svarande

Small extent»1 5%
Some extent»2 10%
Large extent»8 42%
Great extent»8 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.21

- Good availability of the PhD students and the professor.» (Large extent)
- Whoutout it I would have been completely lost!» (Great extent)
- Per och Björn har varit guld värda! De har alltid tagit sig tid att hjälpa och varit jätteduktiga, utan dem hade kursen inte alls varit så bra som jag tycker att den har varit. Bengt har också varit jättebra som tagit sig tid att svara på frågor när vi behövt hjälp. » (Great extent)

11. To what extent was the different parts of the course useful for learning

Matrisfråga

- Boken hade väldigt bra texter men svårförståelig struktur. »

Textbook
19 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 5%
Large extent»6 31%
Great extent»12 63%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

Lectures
19 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»5 26%
Large extent»12 63%
Great extent»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.84

Tutorials
19 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»7 36%
Great extent»12 63%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

Project
19 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 10%
Large extent»5 26%
Great extent»12 63%

Genomsnitt: 3.52

12. Chapter 3 Numerical Aspects of CFD

How difficult did you find the Chapter to read?

19 svarande

Easy»3 15%
Acceptable»14 73%
Difficult»2 10%
Did not read the chapter»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.94

- Good examples, help the understanding.» (Acceptable)

13. Chapter 4 Turbulent flow modeling

How difficult did you find the Chapter to read?

19 svarande

Easy»2 10%
Acceptable»13 68%
Difficult»4 21%
Did not read the chapter»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.1

- This was a good chapter which I hade lot´,s of help with during the report.» (Easy)
- The theory is by itself difficult» (Acceptable)

14. Chapter 5 Turbulent mixing and chemical reactions

How difficult did you find the Chapter to read?

19 svarande

Easy»0 0%
Acceptable»11 57%
Difficult»8 42%
Did not read the chapter»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

- The part on the PDF functions is difficult» (Acceptable)
- Same as for chapter four, helpfull for the report» (Acceptable)
- Svårt att koppla in detta kapitlet i ett större sammanhang. » (Acceptable)
- Probably the hardest chapter» (Difficult)
- This chapter is difficult to understand, some basics are needed to add to this chapter , most importantly PDF part» (Difficult)

15. Chapter 6 Multphase flow modeling

How difficult did you find the Chapter to read?

19 svarande

Easy»0 0%
Acceptable»13 68%
Difficult»5 26%
Did not read the Chapter»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.36

- Svårt att koppla in detta kapitlet i ett större sammanhang. » (Acceptable)

16. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

19 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 5%
Rather well»9 47%
Very well»9 47%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

- More information about the course in the beginning. A better PM over the course of both the lecture and tutorials. The students need to know that they have to put alot of time in advanced.» (Rather badly)
- Couldn"t find the course syllabus» (Rather well)
- The lecture notes are not all up-to-date. As already mentioned, there is no PM to know when the lectures are and their topic.» (Rather well)
- Det hade varit bra med ett PM i början av kursen med all viktig information. » (Rather well)

Study climate

17. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

19 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»3 15%
Very good»16 84%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.84

- Too long time to get help at the tutorials in the beginning» (Rather good)
- Both Per and Björn where very helpfull even off schedual time.» (Very good)
- Som tidigare nämnt, både Per, Björn och Bengt var helt fantastiska med detta.» (Very good)

18. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

19 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 5%
Very well»18 94%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.94

- Good complementarity» (Very well)

19. How was the course workload?

19 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 5%
High»8 42%
Too high»10 52%

Genomsnitt: 4.47

- Very high, especially for the project. » (High)
- It was high workload with the projekt. Otherwise quite low workload» (High)
- maybe not the mean load but absolutely the peak load during the period for the exam and project. » (Too high)
- The oyher course in this period have been completely neglected» (Too high)

20. How was the total workload this study period?

19 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 15%
High»8 42%
Too high»8 42%

Genomsnitt: 4.26

- I had just one course (CFD) this quarter but I think it was not possible for me to handle another course » (High)
- Its the CFD that makes the workload high» (High)
- My lifetime is just for CFD this term » (Too high)
- As mentioned above, one course got to suffer!» (Too high)
- Jag läste en MTS kurs samtidigt som denna och la inte ner mycket tid på den men ändå var detta den mest tidskrävande perioden hittills under studietiden. » (Too high)

Summarizing questions

21. What is your general impression of the course?

19 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 5%
Good»9 47%
Excellent»9 47%

Genomsnitt: 4.42

- The conditions to have higher grades than 3 are really hard.» (Adequate)
- Very intresting field, but with high workload.» (Good)
- It is a very good course with an intresting content.» (Good)
- i loved this course indeed. » (Excellent)
- I really liked the lectures, and the assistants were really helpful and always available.» (Excellent)
- Jättebra, väldigt intressant och lärorik men för tidskrävande.» (Excellent)

22. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- I think it is enough for 7.5 credits»
- the project »
- Par and Bjorn... definitely. »
- The projects and tutorials»
- The structure with tutorial and projects.»
- the work load is too high for 7.5 credits, and we didn"t have enough time to study the course materials»
- The tutorials and the project. It was a very good way to understand the course. »
- The Project.»
- Tutorials and the project.»
- Per and Björn»
- Everything but make it 15 hp instead of 7.5 hp»
- Per och Björn. »

23. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Perhaps the workload should be lower and the requirement for higher grade, the criteria is too high in order to get passed in this course»
- the tutorial could be smaller in term of work»
- Project should be started earlier. May be after 2nd tutorial. So, that all of the students start reading the content about it and can manage better.»
- Timeline for course»
- Ability to lock computers. Possibility to use both cores in the processor for calculations. More teaching about meshing »
- The work load is really high, maybe give some advice to optimize the time during the project e.g. it could be good to validate the geometry and the first settings by the assistant teacher before starting to run useless and time consuming simulations.»
- there should be more time for studying, i think it is maybe good if some more time is put on chapter 3»
- The course should give 15 hp instead of 7.5 hp. Because it is very hard to manage this course and an other course at the same time. »
- I found everything right.»
- Hard to say, since the "munta" is not mandatory maybee the project could be a bit smaller.»
- Update the course book so that its references to figures etc. are correct.»
- Börja med projektet lite tidigare och gör tutorialsen mindre omfattande. »

24. Additional comments

- Excellent work for the tutor and the teacher.»
- It was a very nice course. Course load was bit high but i think it was necessary. Project should be introduced as early as possible so that students can start working on it. Some book/document should be recommended for the kinetics of the SCR project. »
- Generally it is a great course,full of practical aspects to learn, wish you bests for future»
- The course was very nice but it was very hectic and I actually think it deserve to be 15 credit course.»
- The "dugga" is a good idea but add an extra workload.»
- It was a very good course, but the lack of time was a big problem, we do not have enough time to understand everything before the project starts»
- Additional efforts should be made for meshing.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från