|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Project in Applied Mechanics, TME130Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2010-05-12 - 2010-06-10 Antal svar: 17 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 56% Kontaktperson: Tomas Grönstedt» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Maskinteknik 300 hp
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.52 - Blev tvungen att lägga ner för mycket tid på denna kursen.» (Around 25 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?16 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.93 - acLn4Y <a href="http://qoxcoipwnahe.com/">qoxcoipwnahe</a>, [url=http://fidrdkiijssd.com/]fidrdkiijssd[/url], [link=http://cxdiddwghlkn.com/]cxdiddwghlkn[/link], http://nnecivzkpmde.com/» () Goals and goal fulfilment3. How understandable are the course goals?The course PM states:After completion of this course, you should be able to: •, Use ANSYS Workbench to model fluid mechanics, solid mechanics and structural dynamics aspects of wind turbine blades. Every student will learn some basic “,,howtos”,, for all specializations and get more in depth knowledge for your particular specialization. •,, Depending on specialization you will learn how to: - Develop structural dynamic models by system identification (Solid/EMA) - Build up simple composite material models (Solid/EMA) - Methods to preliminary design, CAD, mesh and compute flows around wind turbine blades (2D/3D) (Fluids) - Collect pressure data on a 2D profile using the linear cascade testing facility. - Design suitable stiffening structures for wind turbine blades. - show insight and ability to work in teams and collaborate in groups with different compositions - be able to give written and oral presentations of a larger technical investigation 17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.23 - acLn4Y <a href="http://qoxcoipwnahe.com/">qoxcoipwnahe</a>, [url=http://fidrdkiijssd.com/]fidrdkiijssd[/url], [link=http://cxdiddwghlkn.com/]cxdiddwghlkn[/link], http://nnecivzkpmde.com/» (Understandable) 4. To which extent did you have to establish the abilities that the goals state?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.47 - using Ansys was hellish» (To some extent) Teaching and course administration5. How well did the course administration, course PM, web page, handouts etc work?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.41 - The course web page was really bad and it was hard to find the documents you needed. Please create more folders next time so you know where to search.» (Poor) 6. How do you rate the project related teaching given in this course?In particular, are these lectures relevant for the course, did you find the feedback session on the planning report useful? What was most important to you in the project related work, for instance the group dynamics part or the project definition part?16 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.06 - project definition part was the most important one for me and I believe the rest of the group also think so. Since it is only 8 weeks group dynamic isn´,t that important but the project is.» (?) 7. If you were a fluids student: how do you rate the specialization?Please make some additional comments.9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.11 - acLn4Y <a href="http://qoxcoipwnahe.com/">qoxcoipwnahe</a>, [url=http://fidrdkiijssd.com/]fidrdkiijssd[/url], [link=http://cxdiddwghlkn.com/]cxdiddwghlkn[/link], http://nnecivzkpmde.com/» (Acceptable) 8. If you were a solids/EMA student: how do you rate this specialization?Please make some additional comments.12 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - Projektet var uppbyggt på ett sådant sätt att, för att generalisera en smula, fluiddelen var rättfram och svår att misslyckas med, medan soliddelen å andra sidan var omöjlig att lyckas med,
* Hitta en kritisk sprickstorlek utan att ha en aning om sprickgeometrin och utan kunskaper i hur man behandlar ett sådant problem med FEM.
* Låta resultatet på hela projektet bero på de materialegenskaper som framtogs med EMA, när ingen tidigare arbetat inom detta område. Detta ledde till att EMA-delen tog orimligt mycket tid i anspråk. Dessutom var ju hela proceduren iterativ i någon mening, vilket definitivt inte gjorde saken bättre.
Utöver detta blir det inte lättare när varken datorerna eller programvaran fungerar. Lägg därtill att det inte fanns någon handledare som hade tillräcklig erfarenhet av programmet för att komma fram till lösningar på de allvarliga problem som uppstod, så är det som upplagt för misslyckanden.» (Poor) 9. What is your overall rating of this course?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.47 - I förhållande till hur mycket tid som lades ner på denna kursen är det kunskapsmässiga utbytet skralt. Frustrationen var enorm.» (Poor) 10. Comments on the guest lecture - as given by Kim Branner- It was good but all topics were related to the solid part and not fluid.»- Han var duktig, även om vindkraft kanske inte är det intressantaste området man kan tänka sig.» - A little bit boring. Because he mainly talked about solid not fluid. » - It was interesting, but was too late in the course. At that time, we wanted to focus on the work instead.» - Interesting» - acLn4Y <a href="http://qoxcoipwnahe.com/">qoxcoipwnahe</a>, [url=http://fidrdkiijssd.com/]fidrdkiijssd[/url], [link=http://cxdiddwghlkn.com/]cxdiddwghlkn[/link], http://nnecivzkpmde.com/» - Good. It was a bit too solid specific.» General questions11. How does this course differ from other courses you have read in the programme?- It did. »- It was good especial that we had to validate and compare our result.» - It feels like working on real task and gives more independence.» - It is a project. The other cousrse ar more traditional.» - It was a good opportunity to apply that all i have learned throughout my study career. it helped in developing a better understanding and was a good opportunity to work in a team.» - Den största skillnaden är att man i normala fall får lägga ner mycket tid, samtidigt som man lär sig mycket. I detta fallet fick man lägga ner mycket tid utan att lära sig mycket. Dessutom är projektkurser aldrig att föredra eftersom du då måste förlita dig på att andra gör sitt jobb. I en normal kurs kan du påverka utgången till större del på egen hand.» - The examination form and the practise of real software (Ansys)» - I think this course is good, especially for international student. This course makes me closer to my classmates.» - It was higher work load. But we learned many different things in the course.» - It is the only project course, interaction between the specialisations fluid / solid etc.» - acLn4Y <a href="http://qoxcoipwnahe.com/">qoxcoipwnahe</a>, [url=http://fidrdkiijssd.com/]fidrdkiijssd[/url], [link=http://cxdiddwghlkn.com/]cxdiddwghlkn[/link], http://nnecivzkpmde.com/» - We actually learn what we study here.» 12. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- EMA»- All the material was prepared well.» - lecture about team dynamics by mouline are really nice. second lecture should be in the mid of the course not in last couple of weeks. » - Alla de inblandade lärarna har varit väldigt hjälpsamma och trevliga, så de borde bevaras.» - The many opportunities in the computer rooms» - Better computer» - Ansys Workbench» - A real case where both solid and fluid should work together. » - acLn4Y <a href="http://qoxcoipwnahe.com/">qoxcoipwnahe</a>, [url=http://fidrdkiijssd.com/]fidrdkiijssd[/url], [link=http://cxdiddwghlkn.com/]cxdiddwghlkn[/link], http://nnecivzkpmde.com/» - The challenging task of the project itself!» - The experiments.» 13. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Group dynamics part of the course did not feel like a integreted part but rather just added outside all other things.»- The hardware and software facilities should be improved.» - Model geometry should be provided for solid specialisation. It will make it possible to put more efforts in designing stiffners.» - may be the geometry of the blade can be made simpler. and focus is more on the learning of the software than handling of complex geometries. also if some guidance is given about also validation. because we had to make 2d simulations and if we had some idea how to compare we would have focused on the cases that can be used for validations. » - * Inför betygskriterier så att man vet vad som krävs. * Strunta i datorerna och låt studenterna räkna för hand. Då slipper man frustrationen som uppstår på grund av datoreländet. * Hela projektupplägget borde skrotas och istället kunde exempelvis soliddelen få en kurs i kompositmekanik eller EMA.» - tha ansys tutorial for mechanics. It was almost useless exepted for the interface handeling. We should have more tutorial on mesh controls.» - the wind tunnel lab should be improved» - the computer» - The examinators. The organization of the course was really bad, and sometimes it felt as if they hadn"t talked about some things. Because they didn"t know what the other person had said. Also take away the composite material because it"s really hard to model and to get good results.» - The wind tunnel lab should be done with a profile that corresponds to a cross section to the real blade. » - Computerroom mt13, It gave us all headache. I think the groupdynamic could be mentioned and some exercises carried out but the main think is to get the project done. » - acLn4Y <a href="http://qoxcoipwnahe.com/">qoxcoipwnahe</a>, [url=http://fidrdkiijssd.com/]fidrdkiijssd[/url], [link=http://cxdiddwghlkn.com/]cxdiddwghlkn[/link], http://nnecivzkpmde.com/» - The computer resources.» - I think you should try to choose a project that can be solved in a good way with the resources available. It is perhaps not a good idea to ask for a CFD simulation that requires several million cells to be resolved when you know that the disk space is limited. When nobody knows CAD very well, a geometry with 19 cross sections is maybe also too heavy.» 14. Additional comments!- The report part of the project nneds to be more scientific. I would advice to have some kind of lecture, preferably in the beginning, that explains what the scientific method is and how one writes a scientific report. »- Overall, I"m happy with this course.» - Should not focus so much on planning reports and group dynamics in a project that is only over 7 weeks.» - acLn4Y <a href="http://qoxcoipwnahe.com/">qoxcoipwnahe</a>, [url=http://fidrdkiijssd.com/]fidrdkiijssd[/url], [link=http://cxdiddwghlkn.com/]cxdiddwghlkn[/link], http://nnecivzkpmde.com/»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5%