ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

eHealth, SSY115, VT2010

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-05-07 - 2010-05-18
Antal svar: 23
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 37%
Kontaktperson: Madeleine Persson»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

23 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»4 17%
Around 20 hours/week»8 34%
Around 25 hours/week»6 26%
Around 30 hours/week»4 17%
At least 35 hours/week»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.56

- too many home assignments for the credits» (Around 25 hours/week)
- The most time spent in home assignment...at least 24 hours for each.» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

23 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 4%
50%»1 4%
75%»4 17%
100%»17 73%

Genomsnitt: 4.6

- We are forced to attend the lecture which are totally useless!» (100%)
- As it was mandatory» (100%)
- Missed two lectures due to sickness so between 75% and 100%» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

23 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»4 17%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 26%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»13 56%

Genomsnitt: 3.21

- There"s no use of doing this course if you"re at other field of biomedical engineering.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
- The goal of the course is to practice writing in english !!!! which I will achieve!!! » (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

21 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»2 9%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»17 80%
No, the goals are set too high»2 9%

Genomsnitt: 2

- The lectures seem to be just some stories about what is going on in the world!» (No, the goals are set too low)
- The writting level is set to high in comparison to other courses» (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

22 svarande

No, not at all»1 4%
To some extent»4 18%
Yes, definitely»5 22%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»12 54%

Genomsnitt: 3.27

- I don"t think so , because the basis of assignments is searching through web and I think home exam would be so too. » (?)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

23 svarande

Small extent»2 8%
Some extent»9 39%
Large extent»9 39%
Great extent»3 13%

Genomsnitt: 2.56

- the teacher only appeared the first class. The T.A. couldn"t manage with the course» (Small extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

23 svarande

Small extent»6 26%
Some extent»5 21%
Large extent»12 52%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.26

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

23 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 8%
Rather well»11 47%
Very well»10 43%

Genomsnitt: 3.34

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

23 svarande

Very poor»3 13%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»7 30%
Very good»12 52%
I did not seek help»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.34

- Anna is very good in this way!» (Very good)
- Anna always replied mail quickly : )» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

23 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 4%
Rather well»11 47%
Very well»11 47%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.43

11. How was the course workload?

22 svarande

Too low»1 4%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»14 63%
High»5 22%
Too high»2 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.31

- The workload was not high but the assignments are just time wasting, nothing to learn out of them!» (Adequate)
- Again, too many tasks that at the end weren"t big part of the final mark» (Too high)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

23 svarande

Too low»1 4%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»15 65%
High»7 30%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.21

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

23 svarande

Poor»4 17%
Fair»1 4%
Adequate»6 26%
Good»12 52%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.13

- It was something like marketing and not an engineering course.» (Poor)
- Few seminars were interesting in terms of my background.» (Poor)
- The teacher Anna Gund should be removed from the course. She cannot administrate or take care of students with that attitude. She suspects everybody, all the time. She does not believe us when we talk to her and thinks allways we try to fool her. She counts us during classes to see if anyone left. She is not open to discussion about ANYTHING and thinks she has the ultimate truth. She won"t take a different point of view as valid even if she doesn"t share it. She seems to enjoy her "power" a little too much. Worthless teacher and administrator, she wont go long with that attitude.» (Poor) (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)
- » (Poor) (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)
- The teacher invited all the best lecturers in the topic.» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- quiz»
- The guest lectures and the study visit.»
- The ping pong webpage is useful.»
- quantity of Home assignments, guest lectures»
- lecturers »
- Anna was good in organizing the course, so she should carry on for the next year too»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- THIS COURSE IS JUST WASTE OF TIME!!!!!!»
- so many guest lectures»
- Hand out the assessments earlier, so you can have more time for it, starting earlier, but keep the deadlines.»
- Nothing.»
- Both teacher and T.A. should be more involved in the course. In my opinion the complete course should be rethought, in order to make it more attractive & useful to the biomedical engineer students»
- should add visiting the companies outside more»
- exercise classes.. its vague to understand the concepts in exercise class.»
- reduce home assignments... Since it also takes a lot of time of the teacher to correct all.»
- The teacher Anna Gund should be removed from the course. She cannot administrate or take care of students with that attitude. She suspects everybody, all the time. She does not believe us when we talk to her and thinks allways we try to fool her. She counts us during classes to see if anyone left. She is not open to discussion about ANYTHING and thinks she has the ultimate truth. She won"t take a different point of view as valid even if she doesn"t share it. She seems to enjoy her "power" a little too much. Worthless teacher and administrator, she wont go long with that attitude.» (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)
- » (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)

16. Additional comments

- about correction of the home assignments, i don"t think the system is fair when you downgrade because the date is missing in the reference list when it is not mentioned in the thesis that is should follow harvard system. besides it is not an english course, the main topic should be on the content!»
- If there is more advanced course of this topic, it would be better.»
- no»
- The teacher Anna Gund should be removed from the course. She cannot administrate or take care of students with that attitude. She suspects everybody, all the time. She does not believe us when we talk to her and thinks allways we try to fool her. She counts us during classes to see if anyone left. She is not open to discussion about ANYTHING and thinks she has the ultimate truth. She won"t take a different point of view as valid even if she doesn"t share it. She seems to enjoy her "power" a little too much. Worthless teacher and administrator, she wont go long with that attitude.» (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)
- » (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)

Kursutvärderingssystem från